![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The first of the new bridges on the Wicken Vision Spine route linking
Cambridge and Wicken is now open for foot, cycling and horse-riding traffic. Photos and location are on Cambridge Cycling Campaign's website at <http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/13985/> <http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/13986/> <http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/13987/> The final surface on the connecting paths on either side still has to be laid, so there may be a short interruption in passge soon. Mike |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Excellent, well done to all concerned.
In article <cc630c6e-d108-4a3c-8f0a-14cf35fb5181@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, MikeC <mikec@mikecauser.com> wrote: > The first of the new bridges on the Wicken Vision Spine route linking > Cambridge and Wicken > is now open for foot, cycling and horse-riding traffic. Photos and > location are on Cambridge > Cycling Campaign's website at > > <http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/13985/> > <http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/13986/> > <http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/13987/> > > The final surface on the connecting paths on either side still has to > be laid, so there may > be a short interruption in passge soon. > > > > Mike |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jonathan Schneider wrote:
> I've just been out to give the new Cambridge "Tesco" bridge a go > having put up with months of obstruction on the road. Given it was > prefabricated I have no idea how it took a year to do. > > I wouldn't use it unless I was going to Tesco because Newmarket Road > is horrible. Ignoring the bad location it's not a bad bit of > construction. However if I lived next to it I'd be upset at the amount > of river view it obstructs. > I also couldn't understand why it needed two spans to segregate cycle and pedestrians over the river itself, whilst the access ramps and approach paths weren't segregated (except for a white line). -- Alan -- SPAM BLOCK IN USE! Replace 'deadspam.com' with penguinclub.org.uk to reply in email |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 2:23 pm, "Alan" <a...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> Jonathan Schneider wrote: > > I've just been out to give the new Cambridge "Tesco" bridge a go > > having put up with months of obstruction on the road. Given it was > > prefabricated I have no idea how it took a year to do. > > > I wouldn't use it unless I was going to Tesco because Newmarket Road > > is horrible. Ignoring the bad location it's not a bad bit of > > construction. However if I lived next to it I'd be upset at the amount > > of river view it obstructs. > > I also couldn't understand why it needed two spans to segregate cycle > and pedestrians over the river itself, whilst the access ramps and > approach paths weren't segregated (except for a white line). > > -- > Alan > > -- > SPAM BLOCK IN USE! > Replace 'deadspam.com' with penguinclub.org.uk to reply in email You two are talking about a different cycle bridge. tim |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tim B wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2:23 pm, "Alan" <a...@deadspam.com> wrote: > > Jonathan Schneider wrote: > > > I've just been out to give the new Cambridge "Tesco" bridge a go > > > having put up with months of obstruction on the road. Given it was > > > prefabricated I have no idea how it took a year to do. > > > > > I wouldn't use it unless I was going to Tesco because Newmarket > > > Road is horrible. Ignoring the bad location it's not a bad bit of > > > construction. However if I lived next to it I'd be upset at the > > > amount of river view it obstructs. > > > > I also couldn't understand why it needed two spans to segregate > > cycle and pedestrians over the river itself, whilst the access > > ramps and approach paths weren't segregated (except for a white > > line). > > > > -- > > Alan > > > > -- > > SPAM BLOCK IN USE! > > Replace 'deadspam.com' with penguinclub.org.uk to reply in email > > You two are talking about a different cycle bridge. > tim Damn - A bridge too far? -- Alan -- SPAM BLOCK IN USE! Replace 'deadspam.com' with penguinclub.org.uk to reply in email |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tim B <timburford@onetel.net> writes:
> On Jun 9, 2:23 pm, "Alan" <a...@deadspam.com> wrote: >> Jonathan Schneider wrote: >> > I've just been out to give the new Cambridge "Tesco" bridge a go >> >> I also couldn't understand why it needed two spans to segregate cycle >> and pedestrians over the river itself, whilst the access ramps and >> approach paths weren't segregated (except for a white line). >> >> -- >> Alan > > You two are talking about a different cycle bridge. > tim Oh no he's not. The bit over the river is segregated. Jon |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 3:25 pm, Jonathan Schneider <j...@jschneider.tenreversed>
wrote: > Tim B <timburf...@onetel.net> writes: > > On Jun 9, 2:23 pm, "Alan" <a...@deadspam.com> wrote: > >> Jonathan Schneider wrote: > >> > I've just been out to give the new Cambridge "Tesco" bridge a go > > >> I also couldn't understand why it needed two spans to segregate cycle > >> and pedestrians over the river itself, whilst the access ramps and > >> approach paths weren't segregated (except for a white line). > > >> -- > >> Alan > > > You two are talking about a different cycle bridge. > > tim > > Oh no he's not. The bit over the river is segregated. > > Jon Silly boy. Look at the original post and photos again. NOT the Tesco bridge. Tim |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In message <0f6d5efa-cea7-493f-b7e0-3cff74cb237e@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
Tim B <timburford@onetel.net> wrote: > On Jun 9, 3:25 pm, Jonathan Schneider <j...@jschneider.tenreversed> > wrote: > > Tim B <timburf...@onetel.net> writes: [snip] > > > You two are talking about a different cycle bridge. > > > tim > > > > Oh no he's not. The bit over the river is segregated. > > > > Jon > > Silly boy. Look at the original post and photos again. NOT the Tesco > bridge. > Tim It's quite understandable, you hang around for ages waiting for a cycle bridge to arrive, and then two come along at the same time! There might of course be a fishy explanation. ;-) Mike -- o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "A mountain climbing, cycling, skiing, "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \> | caving, antibody engineer and ` || (_)/ (_) | \corn computer user" |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 5:18 pm, Mike Clark <m...@nospam.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> In message <0f6d5efa-cea7-493f-b7e0-3cff74cb2...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> > Tim B <timburf...@onetel.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 9, 3:25 pm, Jonathan Schneider <j...@jschneider.tenreversed> > > wrote: > > > Tim B <timburf...@onetel.net> writes: > [snip] > > > > You two are talking about a different cycle bridge. > > > > tim > > > > Oh no he's not. The bit over the river is segregated. > > > > Jon > > > Silly boy. Look at the original post and photos again. NOT the Tesco > > bridge. > > Tim > > It's quite understandable, you hang around for ages waiting for a cycle > bridge to arrive, and then two come along at the same time! > > There might of course be a fishy explanation. > > ;-) > > Mike > -- > o/ \\ // |\ ,_ o Mike Clark > <\__,\\ // __o | \ / /\, "A mountain climbing, cycling, skiing, > "> || _`\<,_ |__\ \> | caving, antibody engineer and > ` || (_)/ (_) | \corn computer user" No point rowing about it. ;-) Tim |
|