![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Martin" <martin.dann@virgin.net> wrote in message news:Eqk2k.77989$SA7.56370@newsfe09.ams2... > > Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: > > http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 No, still doesn't make sense to me :-) cheers, clive |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Martin" <martin.dann@virgin.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:Eqk2k.77989$SA7.56370@newsfe09.ams2... > > Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: > > http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 > You saw a parked car. Still there - even if the google picture is a year old. Strange - I admit. ;-) tomov |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 07/06/2008 01:15, Martin said,
> > Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: > > http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 Go on then, spill the beans ;-) -- Paul Boyd http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/ |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Martin wrote:
> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: > > http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done - have a lollipop. -- Cheerz - Brownz '89 K100RS '53 JCW MCS (Cage) http://www.brownz.org/ |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0100, "Brownz \(Mobile\)"
<someone.not@microsoft.com> wrote: >Martin wrote: >> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: >> >> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 > >You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done - have a >lollipop. The optional cycle lane, if that is what it is and not a bus lane, is unusually wide for an optional cycle lane. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Crispin wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0100, "Brownz \(Mobile\)" > <someone.not@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> Martin wrote: >>> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: >>> >>> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 >> >> You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done >> - have a lollipop. > > The optional cycle lane, if that is what it is and not a bus lane, is > unusually wide for an optional cycle lane. Wooo ...... fap fap fap fap. -- Cheerz - Brownz '89 K100RS '53 JCW MCS (Cage) http://www.brownz.org/ |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Crispin wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:50:36 +0100, "Brownz \(Mobile\)" > <someone.not@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> Martin wrote: >>> Just got in, and whilst I was out I saw this: >>> >>> http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&h...001389&t=h&z=20 >> You saw a road - and it was so good you posted it twice - well done - have a >> lollipop. Thankyou, I like lollipops. The first post never re-appeared on my computer, and I though it got lost in the ether. > The optional cycle lane, if that is what it is and not a bus lane, is > unusually wide for an optional cycle lane. Correct, you win the banana. At this point the advisory cycle lane going uphill (left to right) is wider than the adjacent general purpose lane. It thins out at the top, and is also thinner further down. My guess is that the cycle lane is actually a traffic calming/road narrowing measure. The cycle lanes on this road are the only ones of any decent width that I have seen in Bristol. |
|