![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I put together a little web page at www.odd-bikes.com with links to
the strangest bicycles I have ever seen. Enjoy! - Jeff |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
javawizard wrote:
> I put together a little web page at www.odd-bikes.com with links to > the strangest bicycles I have ever seen. Enjoy! - Jeff Very nice. I particularly like the Zero Bike: http://www.flickr.com/photos/laulau...994357/sizes/o/ |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In rec.bicycles.misc Peter Pie Eater <M8R-0ku37n@mailinator.com> wrote:
> javawizard wrote: >> I put together a little web page at www.odd-bikes.com with links to >> the strangest bicycles I have ever seen. Enjoy! - Jeff > > Very nice. I particularly like the Zero Bike: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/laulau...994357/sizes/o/ Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK. -- Dane Buson - sigdane@unixbigots.org PHB: "According to M$ Project, your utilization level is 1850%." CS: "You mean I have a load average of 18.5?" -- Charlie Stross |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <d...@unseen.edu> wrote:
> In rec.bicycles.misc Peter Pie Eater <M8R-0ku...@mailinator.com> wrote: > > > javawizard wrote: > >> I put together a little web page atwww.odd-bikes.comwith links to > >> the strangest bicycles I have ever seen. Enjoy! - Jeff > > > Very nice. I particularly like the Zero Bike: > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/laulau...994357/sizes/o/ > > Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is > only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK. The only thing the OP is counting is the click-through dollars. Check the spammi...errr...posting history. R |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In rec.bicycles.misc RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <d...@unseen.edu> wrote: >> >> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is >> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK. > > The only thing the OP is counting is the click-through dollars. Check > the spammi...errr...posting history. Well yeah, but I was mostly just talking to the responder (I am assuming that he's not a sockpuppet). -- Dane Buson - n0n6t0p8@unixbigots.org And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dane Buson wrote:
> In rec.bicycles.misc RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <d...@unseen.edu> wrote: >>> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is >>> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK. Well I found it interesting because I'd not come across the Zero Bike before. It was just a list of interesting ideas as far as I was concerned. >> The only thing the OP is counting is the click-through dollars. Check >> the spammi...errr...posting history. I apologise if I've encouraged a spammer. I did notice that he'd crossposted to quite a few groups but they all seemed on topic as was his web site. With all the non-relevant spams I get day in day out, one that is actually targetted towards a particular audience is a refreshing change. > Well yeah, but I was mostly just talking to the responder (I am assuming > that he's not a sockpuppet). Well having just defended a spammer, I'm questioning whether I'm a sockpuppet myself :-o I'm not though! |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In rec.bicycles.misc Peter Pie Eater <M8R-0ku37n@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Dane Buson wrote: >> In rec.bicycles.misc RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote: >>> On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <d...@unseen.edu> wrote: > >>>> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is >>>> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK. > > Well I found it interesting because I'd not come across the Zero Bike > before. It was just a list of interesting ideas as far as I was concerned. I suppose I look at the zero bike as over-engineered tomfoolery. There are enough bad ideas in bicycling that we don't need to go blue-skying to find new novel bad ideas. >> Well yeah, but I was mostly just talking to the responder (I am assuming >> that he's not a sockpuppet). > > Well having just defended a spammer, I'm questioning whether I'm a > sockpuppet myself :-o I'm not though! Suuuurre you're not. I just have one question sock-boy - Cotton or Wool? ;-) -- Dane Buson - n0n6t0p8@unixbigots.org "Protecting the children is a good way to get a lot of adults who cant stand up for themselves" -J. Stecher |
|