Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Re: Load carrying devices.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-06.-2008, 04:22 AM   #1
(PeteCresswell)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

Per !Jones:
>rigs for carrying significant loads


Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.

I tried Googling, but no luck.

All I found was http://tinyurl.com/3gros2
--
PeteCresswell
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 04:48 AM   #2
!Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:22:12 -0400, in rec.bicycles.tech
"(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote:

>Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
>called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
>worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.


Talk about a poor choice of name! Remember the car named "Matador"?
GM built it in the '70s, right?

My tricycle is ridable on a smooth road *if* you don't hang a sharp
turn. When I bought it in Monterrey, NL, I asked the mechanic how it
turned... he shrugged and said (translating from Spanish): "If you
value your face as much as I value your face, then you may do as you
please." Therein, I found great wisdom!

Jones

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 04:59 AM   #3
Tom Kunich
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

"!Jones" <hi@there.org> wrote in message
news:gcdo44hharb0m5rvv576muasnst86k7020@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:22:12 -0400, in rec.bicycles.tech
> "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote:
>
>>Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
>>called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
>>worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.

>
> Talk about a poor choice of name! Remember the car named "Matador"?
> GM built it in the '70s, right?


No, it was built by AMC sometimes known as Nash.


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:08 AM   #4
A Muzi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

> "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote:
>> Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
>> called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
>> worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.


!Jones wrote:
> Talk about a poor choice of name! Remember the car named "Matador"?
> GM built it in the '70s, right?
>
> My tricycle is ridable on a smooth road *if* you don't hang a sharp
> turn. When I bought it in Monterrey, NL, I asked the mechanic how it
> turned... he shrugged and said (translating from Spanish): "If you
> value your face as much as I value your face, then you may do as you
> please." Therein, I found great wisdom!


Matador was Rambler-AMC
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:16 AM   #5
Tom Kunich
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

"A Muzi" <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote in message
news:8101f$484c3bf2$12370@news.teranews.com...
>
> Matador was Rambler-AMC


Hey Andy, I suppose it takes a couple of old car buffs such as we are to
remember such things that have nil importance.

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:20 AM   #6
A Muzi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

> "A Muzi" <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote
>> Matador was Rambler-AMC


Tom Kunich wrote:
> Hey Andy, I suppose it takes a couple of old car buffs such as we are to
> remember such things that have nil importance.


I used to have a small AMC right-side-drive ex-US Mail truck for the
bike shop. Yoshi Konno saw it, noted the AMC logo, and said dreamily,
"ahh.. Nash..."

--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:35 AM   #7
clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:48:11 -0500, !Jones <hi@there.org> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:22:12 -0400, in rec.bicycles.tech
>"(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote:
>
>>Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
>>called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
>>worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.


XtraCycle
>
>Talk about a poor choice of name! Remember the car named "Matador"?
>GM built it in the '70s, right?
>


Actually it was AMC
>My tricycle is ridable on a smooth road *if* you don't hang a sharp
>turn. When I bought it in Monterrey, NL, I asked the mechanic how it
>turned... he shrugged and said (translating from Spanish): "If you
>value your face as much as I value your face, then you may do as you
>please." Therein, I found great wisdom!
>
>Jones


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:40 AM   #8
Gary Young
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:22:12 -0400, (PeteCresswell) wrote:

> Per !Jones:
>>rigs for carrying significant loads

>
> Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they called
> something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually worked, as long
> as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.
>
> I tried Googling, but no luck.
>
> All I found was http://tinyurl.com/3gros2


Do you mean the xtracycle?:

http://www.xtracycle.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:43 AM   #9
clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:59:00 -0700, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>
wrote:

>"!Jones" <hi@there.org> wrote in message
>news:gcdo44hharb0m5rvv576muasnst86k7020@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:22:12 -0400, in rec.bicycles.tech
>> "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
>>>called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
>>>worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.

>>
>> Talk about a poor choice of name! Remember the car named "Matador"?
>> GM built it in the '70s, right?

>
>No, it was built by AMC sometimes known as Nash.


And Hudson
Also , later, known as Rambler.
And Jeep - and for a while also Renault.

And AM General - the Hummer people was also part of the AMC group for
a while - along with Kelvinator
>


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:52 AM   #10
anth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:22 -0400, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
> Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they
> called something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually
> worked, as long as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.


Xtracyle, alternate names for this sort of thing are longtail and Sport
Utility Bike.

http://xtracycle.com/

The Yuba Mundo is a complete bike which I think is compatible with
Xtracycle accessories (not certain of this though).

http://yubaride.com/

The Surly Big Dummy frame + fork definitely takes Xtracycle accessories.

http://www.surlybikes.com/bigdummy.html

The Kona Ute is a similar concept but incompatible.

http://www.konaworld.com/08_ute_w.htm

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 05:56 AM   #11
Twitchell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

In article <P9OdnSaz3PtH3tHVnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com>, Gary Young says...
>
>On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:22:12 -0400, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
>
>> Per !Jones:
>>>rigs for carrying significant loads

>>
>> Somebody was making an entire bolt-on extended rear triangle they called
>> something like "Bike SUV" - that looked like it actually worked, as long
>> as there was a relatively smooth riding surface.
>>
>> I tried Googling, but no luck.
>>
>> All I found was http://tinyurl.com/3gros2

>
>Do you mean the xtracycle?:
>
>http://www.xtracycle.com/


Amazingly enough, the bike is called "Marin Novato 2007 S.U.B."

http://www.xtracycle.com/2006-marin-novato-p-70.html

This is made by Marin Bike which is located in my small town of Novato! Marin
Bike is also the manufacturer of my "junker" bike from 1994.

twitch

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 07:17 AM   #12
John Forrest Tomlinson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

I first saw this when Jobst Brandt posted it:

http://aistigave.hit.bg/Logistics/
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 08:12 AM   #13
!Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:59:00 -0700, in rec.bicycles.tech "Tom Kunich"
<cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

>> Talk about a poor choice of name! Remember the car named "Matador"?
>> GM built it in the '70s, right?

>
>No, it was built by AMC sometimes known as Nash.


Right you are! The name translates to "killer", BTW. Obviously,
someone didn't think that it mattered.

Jones

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 08:12 AM   #14
!Jones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:08:41 -0500, in rec.bicycles.tech A Muzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>Matador was Rambler-AMC


I stand corrected.

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06.-2008, 08:58 AM   #15
(PeteCresswell)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Load carrying devices.

Per !Jones:
>Right you are! The name translates to "killer", BTW. Obviously,
>someone didn't think that it mattered.


Reminds me of the motorcycle BridgeStone brought out in the late
sixties: the logo on the gas tank was "BS".
--
PeteCresswell
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com