Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
11-06.-2008, 02:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
van Impe
I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or
if it's still not allowed because he's grieving? Thanks, Magilla |
|
|
11-06.-2008, 03:48 AM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
"MagillaGorilla" <magilla@zoo.com> wrote in message news:bcydnZTmsPnTK9PVnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@ptd.net... >I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or if >it's still not allowed because he's grieving? > > Thanks, > > Magilla Why does WADA permit TUEs for asthma inhalers? |
|
|
|
11-06.-2008, 08:44 AM
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
On Jun 10, 7:13 pm, MagillaGorilla <magi...@zoo.com> wrote:
> I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or > if it's still not allowed because he's grieving? > > Thanks, > > Magilla It's OK to test him. If he's positive, then ASO will take back his 1976 TdF title (he's Belgian). -ilan |
|
|
|
11-06.-2008, 01:43 PM
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
On Jun 10, 10:13*am, MagillaGorilla <magi...@zoo.com> wrote:
> I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or > if it's still not allowed because he's grieving? This simply ridiculous, why would one test a rider who is not even racing. > Thanks, > > Magilla |
|
|
|
11-06.-2008, 01:59 PM
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
"hizark21" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:7541c8bc-56d4-444a-82c2-21855a420c6d@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com... On Jun 10, 10:13 am, MagillaGorilla <magi...@zoo.com> wrote: > I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or > if it's still not allowed because he's grieving? This simply ridiculous, why would one test a rider who is not even racing. -------------------- It seems that you do not understand the purpose for out of competition testing. |
|
|
|
11-06.-2008, 10:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
hizark21 wrote:
> On Jun 10, 10:13 am, MagillaGorilla <magi...@zoo.com> wrote: > >>I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or >>if it's still not allowed because he's grieving? > > > > This simply ridiculous, why would one test a rider who is not even > racing. Dude, Are you retarded? Magilla |
|
|
|
12-06.-2008, 03:02 AM
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
On Jun 11, 9:21 am, MagillaGorilla <magi...@zoo.com> wrote:
> hizark21 wrote: > > > This simply ridiculous, why would one test a rider who is not even > > racing. > > Dude, > > Are you retarded? You mean Lucien is still racing? Cool. Is he fat? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucien_Van_Impe |
|
|
|
12-06.-2008, 12:14 PM
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
So in other words you think we should go back and test former pros
such as Hinault, Merckx and Moser etc.... This assumption is nonsensical since they no longer race so therefore they are no longer goverened by UCI. The only way to get them to submit to a drug test is to get a court to order them to. This in my mind amounts to a witch hunt. Carl Sundquist wrote: > "hizark21" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:7541c8bc-56d4-444a-82c2-21855a420c6d@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 10, 10:13 am, MagillaGorilla <magi...@zoo.com> wrote: > > I just want to know for the record if it's okay to dope test van Impe or > > if it's still not allowed because he's grieving? > > > This simply ridiculous, why would one test a rider who is not even > racing. > > -------------------- > > It seems that you do not understand the purpose for out of competition > testing. |
|
|
|
12-06.-2008, 12:57 PM
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
In article <706906d2-a578-4504-9e7b-a0076f6bf2f1@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
hizark21 <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote: > So in other words you think we should go back and test former pros > such as Hinault, Merckx and Moser etc.... This assumption is > nonsensical since they no longer race so therefore they are no longer > goverened by UCI. The only way to get them to submit to a drug test is > to get a court to order them to. This in my mind amounts to a witch > hunt. There's a more recent van Impe than Lucien. See these threads from a couple of months ago: http://tinyurl.com/68k477 http://tinyurl.com/6rgqpg -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
13-06.-2008, 12:36 PM
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
Seems to me that Magilla should have been more clear in the beginning
of the thread. Howard Kveck wrote: > In article <706906d2-a578-4504-9e7b-a0076f6bf2f1@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, > hizark21 <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > So in other words you think we should go back and test former pros > > such as Hinault, Merckx and Moser etc.... This assumption is > > nonsensical since they no longer race so therefore they are no longer > > goverened by UCI. The only way to get them to submit to a drug test is > > to get a court to order them to. This in my mind amounts to a witch > > hunt. > > There's a more recent van Impe than Lucien. See these threads from a couple of > months ago: > > http://tinyurl.com/68k477 > > http://tinyurl.com/6rgqpg > > -- > tanx, > Howard > > The bloody pubs are bloody dull > The bloody clubs are bloody full > Of bloody girls and bloody guys > With bloody murder in their eyes > > remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
13-06.-2008, 01:07 PM
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
Last year it could have been Sebastian Hinault, Axel Merckx, and Leonardo
Moser as well as Van Impe. "hizark21" <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:9754b569-a9c7-438a-83b0-94f17e2f110c@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com... > Seems to me that Magilla should have been more clear in the beginning > of the thread. > > Howard Kveck wrote: >> In article >> <706906d2-a578-4504-9e7b-a0076f6bf2f1@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, >> hizark21 <hizark21@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > So in other words you think we should go back and test former pros >> > such as Hinault, Merckx and Moser etc.... This assumption is >> > nonsensical since they no longer race so therefore they are no longer >> > goverened by UCI. The only way to get them to submit to a drug test is >> > to get a court to order them to. This in my mind amounts to a witch >> > hunt. >> >> There's a more recent van Impe than Lucien. See these threads from a >> couple of >> months ago: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/68k477 >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6rgqpg >> >> -- >> tanx, >> Howard >> >> The bloody pubs are bloody dull >> The bloody clubs are bloody full >> Of bloody girls and bloody guys >> With bloody murder in their eyes >> >> remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
|
|
|
13-06.-2008, 05:51 PM
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
Carl Sundquist schreef:
> Last year it could have been Sebastian Hinault, Axel Merckx, and > Leonardo Moser as well as Van Impe. Planckaert? There's always a Planckaert. Don't forget Nicholas Roche and the CXers Ricardo van de Velde, Boy van Poppel, Radomir Simunek. |
|
|
|
13-06.-2008, 06:06 PM
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
On Jun 12, 8:36*pm, hizark21 <hizar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Seems to me that Magilla should have been more clear in the beginning > of the thread. Dumbass - It's your own fault for thinking that they'd be testing riders who retired 25+ years ago. Not Magilla's fault. Yours. Why is it that bike racer excuse making finds its way into all sorts of non-racing aspects of life? thanks, K. Gringioni. |
|
|
|
13-06.-2008, 10:41 PM
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: van Impe
On Jun 13, 5:06 am, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 8:36 pm, hizark21 <hizar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Seems to me that Magilla should have been more clear in the beginning > > of the thread. > > Dumbass - > > It's your own fault for thinking that they'd be testing riders who > retired 25+ years ago. Not Magilla's fault. Yours. They don't test an ex-racer until the autopsy. R |
|
|
Linear Mode
