![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Like a gold coin on a dunghill, the truth about the EU
Last updated at 12:19 AM on 08th June 2008 Peter Lilley's message is clear - 80 per cent of Britain's laws are now made in Brussels and Parliament has no power to reject or amend them Amid the silly soap opera that now passes for British politics, in which we are supposed to care more about hairstyles and mannerisms than about the country, there was one moment last week when a decent man said something important. The brief flash of truth shone out like a gold coin on a dunghill. The man was Peter Lilley, older and wiser than when he used to sing daft songs to Tory conferences. Mr Lilley looks to me as if, like several others, he is trapped in the Unconservative Party and would blossom like an irrigated desert if only he could escape from it. Because what he said was important, there have been far too few reports of it. Hansard for Tuesday, June 3, at 3.35pm, will give you the details, if you want them. But his clear, hard message was that 80 per cent of our laws are now made in Brussels, and Parliament has no power to reject or amend them. If you wonder why our Post Offices are all closing, it’s thanks to an EU directive. So is the increasingly hated Data Protection Act. So are Home Improvement Packs and fortnightly bin collections. In 15 years’ time our Parliament will have only two functions left – to raise taxes and declare war – admittedly things that our current politicians are rather keen on. Mr Lilley’s mischievous suggestion is that MPs’ pay should be cut each time they hand over authority to others. Incredibly, many MPs don’t know what is going on. If they ended up on the wages paid to district councillors – which is all they really are now – they might care more. His own stark words cannot be improved upon: ‘Few voters, or even members of this house, fully realise how many powers have been, or are about to be, transferred elsewhere. There are three reasons for this. The first is that governments of all persuasions deny that any significant powers are being transferred. The second is that, once powers have been transferred, Ministers engage in a charade of pretence that they still retain those powers. Even when introducing measures that they are obliged to bring in as a result of an EU directive they behave as though the initiative were their own. ‘Indeed, Ministers often end up nobly accepting responsibility for laws that they actually opposed when they were being negotiated in Brussels.’ So now you know. Not since Dunkirk, 68 years ago, has our national independence been so imperilled. But back then, we could see the danger. Now most of us pretend it isn’t there. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-truth-EU.html I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con or Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine and GET A CLUE. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...britain-39.html |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 10, 10:40*pm, St Georges Day April 23rd
<bbbbbdfgdfgdgd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...old-coin-dunghi... > > I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con or > Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that > they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have > the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! > > Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine > and GET A CLUE. > > http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...front-britain-3... Oh is Fascism back in vogue. I thought we got rid of that in WWII. Obviously it's been lurking in some smelly dark pit waiting for an opportunity to raise its foul head and besmirch the good deeds of our ancestors. What colour shirt will it be this time? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
madge wrote:
> On Jun 10, 10:40 pm, St Georges Day April 23rd > <bbbbbdfgdfgdgd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...old-coin-dunghi... >> >> I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con or >> Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that >> they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have >> the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! >> >> Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine >> and GET A CLUE. >> >> http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...front-britain-3... > > Oh is Fascism back in vogue. I thought we got rid of that in WWII. > Obviously it's been lurking in some smelly dark pit waiting for an > opportunity to raise its foul head and besmirch the good deeds of our > ancestors. What colour shirt will it be this time? Green, judging by the amount of power those wankers seem to wield. "Environmental Luddite Fascists" -- Pete M - OMF#9 Range Rover V8 Turbo Range Rover 4.6 HSE "Wait! We can't stop here, this is Bat Country" |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is no EU legislation forcing post office closures. This is a matter
for the UK Government and Royal Mail. EU postal reform (Directive 97/67/EC, as amended by Directives 2002/39/EC and 2008/6/EC) seeks to secure key standards, protect consumers, improve quality of service and promote choice for postal users. The Postal Directive does not stipulate how many post offices the UK must have, nor has the European Commission ever recommended how many post offices there should be in any Member State. It is up to the universal service provider (Royal Mail) and Her Majesty's Government to determine the optimal size of the national network to meet universal service needs. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
slinky wrote:
> There is no EU legislation forcing post office closures. This is a matter > for the UK Government and Royal Mail. EU postal reform (Directive 97/67/EC, as amended > by Directives 2002/39/EC and 2008/6/EC) seeks to secure key standards, protect > consumers, improve quality of service and promote choice for postal users. > The Postal Directive does not stipulate how many post offices the UK must have, > nor has the European Commission ever recommended how many post offices there should > be in any Member State. It is up to the universal service provider (Royal > Mail) and Her Majesty's Government to determine the optimal size of the national > network to meet universal service needs. Now you're just ruining everything, quoting boring old /facts/ as if they had anything to do with things... People will be saying the BNP are a bunch of irrelevant scaremongering loons without a clue next! Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:40:12 -0700 (PDT), St Georges Day April 23rd wrote:
> Like a gold coin on a dunghill, the truth about the EU > Last updated at 12:19 AM on 08th June 2008 > > Peter Lilley's message is clear - 80 per cent of Britain's laws are > now made in Brussels and Parliament has no power to reject or amend > them > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-truth-EU.html Just what I'd expect from the Daily Wail, the journal of the BNP. -- Stephen Patterson :: steve@patter.mine.nu :: http://patter.mine.nu/ GPG: B416F0DE :: Jabber: patter@jabber.earth.li "Don't be silly, Minnie. Who'd be walking round these cliffs with a gas oven?" |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
madge wrote:
> On Jun 10, 10:40 pm, St Georges Day April 23rd > <bbbbbdfgdfgdgd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...old-coin-dunghi... >> >> I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con >> or Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that >> they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have >> the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! >> >> Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine >> and GET A CLUE. >> >> http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...front-britain-3... > > Oh is Fascism back in vogue. I thought we got rid of that in WWII. > Obviously it's been lurking in some smelly dark pit waiting for an > opportunity to raise its foul head and besmirch the good deeds of our > ancestors. What colour shirt will it be this time? Who cares, so long as they wear shorts to expose the superior British knee. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 10, 11:50*pm, "slinky" <sli...@slinky.com> wrote:
> There is no EU legislation forcing post office closures. This is a matter > for the UK > Government and Royal Mail. EU postal reform (Directive 97/67/EC, as amended > by > > Directives 2002/39/EC and 2008/6/EC) seeks to secure key standards, protect > > consumers, improve quality of service and promote choice for postal users. > The Postal Directive does not stipulate how many post offices the UK must have, > nor has the European Commission ever recommended how many post offices there should be in any Member State. It is up to the universal service provider >(Royal Mail) and Her Majesty's Government to determine the optimal size of the national network to meet universal service needs. I bet you throw cracking dinner parties! |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Pete M" <pete.murray@SPAMFREEblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:g2mu1l$1g2$1@registered.motzarella.org... : Green, judging by the amount of power those wankers seem to wield. : : "Environmental Luddite Fascists" amazing how much influence 10% of the population has. The USofA now has more proven oil reserves than Saudi Arabia, but the 10% have put the nix on drilling. And we could all build more nuclear power stations, but the same 10% have nixed that as well. I suggest we build special hospitals, powered by *alternative energy* and that's where we treat/administer/care for the 10% and their families. And if the electricity fails during the heart by-pass surgery because of lack of wind, tough tea-bags. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:40:12 -0700 (PDT), St Georges Day April 23rd
<bbbbbdfgdfgdgddfg@googlemail.com> wrote: <snipped drivel> Does it really matter where they are made, it's going to be somewhere? The trick is not to worry about such things and max your life while you've still got it. I find the best thing to do is to avoid the news like the plague. It never changes, just the names alter, so what is the point worrying about it. Simple really. Aj |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And why cross post it over here...
Just do as the French do, ignore the laws you don't like. Brian -- Brian Gaff - briang1@blueyonder.co.uk Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! "Ed" <eabowden@onetel.com> wrote in message news:7bf49de2-ceef-45ae-a114-77e85f6b9482@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Jun 10, 11:50 pm, "slinky" <sli...@slinky.com> wrote: > There is no EU legislation forcing post office closures. This is a matter > for the UK > Government and Royal Mail. EU postal reform (Directive 97/67/EC, as > amended > by > > Directives 2002/39/EC and 2008/6/EC) seeks to secure key standards, > protect > > consumers, improve quality of service and promote choice for postal users. > The Postal Directive does not stipulate how many post offices the UK must > have, > nor has the European Commission ever recommended how many post offices > there should be in any Member State. It is up to the universal service > provider >(Royal Mail) and Her Majesty's Government to determine the optimal size of >the national network to meet universal service needs. I bet you throw cracking dinner parties! |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
madge wrote:
> On Jun 10, 10:40 pm, St Georges Day April 23rd > <bbbbbdfgdfgdgd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...old-coin-dunghi... >> >> I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con or >> Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that >> they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have >> the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! >> >> Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine >> and GET A CLUE. >> >> http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...front-britain-3... > > Oh is Fascism back in vogue. I thought we got rid of that in WWII. > Obviously it's been lurking in some smelly dark pit waiting for an > opportunity to raise its foul head and besmirch the good deeds of our > ancestors. What colour shirt will it be this time? Burberry ... -- neil h google brights |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
John Rowland wrote:
> madge wrote: >> On Jun 10, 10:40 pm, St Georges Day April 23rd >> <bbbbbdfgdfgdgd...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...old-coin-dunghi... >>> >>> I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con >>> or Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that >>> they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have >>> the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! >>> >>> Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine >>> and GET A CLUE. >>> >>> http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...front-britain-3... >> Oh is Fascism back in vogue. I thought we got rid of that in WWII. >> Obviously it's been lurking in some smelly dark pit waiting for an >> opportunity to raise its foul head and besmirch the good deeds of our >> ancestors. What colour shirt will it be this time? > > Who cares, so long as they wear shorts to expose the superior British knee. > > Bring back Roderick Spode! -- neil h google brights |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"St Georges Day April 23rd" <bbbbbdfgdfgdgddfg@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:02337c87-27b8-473b-9f73-0cc45b7a784b@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... Like a gold coin on a dunghill, the truth about the EU Last updated at 12:19 AM on 08th June 2008 Peter Lilley's message is clear - 80 per cent of Britain's laws are now made in Brussels and Parliament has no power to reject or amend them Amid the silly soap opera that now passes for British politics, in which we are supposed to care more about hairstyles and mannerisms than about the country, there was one moment last week when a decent man said something important. The brief flash of truth shone out like a gold coin on a dunghill. The man was Peter Lilley, older and wiser than when he used to sing daft songs to Tory conferences. Mr Lilley looks to me as if, like several others, he is trapped in the Unconservative Party and would blossom like an irrigated desert if only he could escape from it. Because what he said was important, there have been far too few reports of it. Hansard for Tuesday, June 3, at 3.35pm, will give you the details, if you want them. But his clear, hard message was that 80 per cent of our laws are now made in Brussels, and Parliament has no power to reject or amend them. If you wonder why our Post Offices are all closing, it’s thanks to an EU directive. So is the increasingly hated Data Protection Act. So are Home Improvement Packs and fortnightly bin collections. In 15 years’ time our Parliament will have only two functions left – to raise taxes and declare war – admittedly things that our current politicians are rather keen on. Mr Lilley’s mischievous suggestion is that MPs’ pay should be cut each time they hand over authority to others. Incredibly, many MPs don’t know what is going on. If they ended up on the wages paid to district councillors – which is all they really are now – they might care more. His own stark words cannot be improved upon: ‘Few voters, or even members of this house, fully realise how many powers have been, or are about to be, transferred elsewhere. There are three reasons for this. The first is that governments of all persuasions deny that any significant powers are being transferred. The second is that, once powers have been transferred, Ministers engage in a charade of pretence that they still retain those powers. Even when introducing measures that they are obliged to bring in as a result of an EU directive they behave as though the initiative were their own. ‘Indeed, Ministers often end up nobly accepting responsibility for laws that they actually opposed when they were being negotiated in Brussels.’ So now you know. Not since Dunkirk, 68 years ago, has our national independence been so imperilled. But back then, we could see the danger. Now most of us pretend it isn’t there. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-truth-EU.html I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con or Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine and GET A CLUE. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...britain-39.html |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Lord Turkey Cough" <spamdump@invalid.com> wrote in message news:dVX3k.26496$pu3.15349@newsfe05.ams2... > > "St Georges Day April 23rd" <bbbbbdfgdfgdgddfg@googlemail.com> wrote in > message > news:02337c87-27b8-473b-9f73-0cc45b7a784b@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... > Like a gold coin on a dunghill, the truth about the EU > Last updated at 12:19 AM on 08th June 2008 > > Peter Lilley's message is clear - 80 per cent of Britain's laws are > now made in Brussels and Parliament has no power to reject or amend > them > > Amid the silly soap opera that now passes for British politics, in > which we are supposed to care more about hairstyles and mannerisms > than about the country, there was one moment last week when a decent > man said something important. The brief flash of truth shone out like > a gold coin on a dunghill. > > The man was Peter Lilley, older and wiser than when he used to sing > daft songs to Tory conferences. Mr Lilley looks to me as if, like > several others, he is trapped in the Unconservative Party and would > blossom like an irrigated desert if only he could escape from it. > > Because what he said was important, there have been far too few > reports of it. Hansard for Tuesday, June 3, at 3.35pm, will give you > the details, if you want them. > > But his clear, hard message was that 80 per cent of our laws are now > made in Brussels, and Parliament has no power to reject or amend > them. > > If you wonder why our Post Offices are all closing, it's thanks to an > EU directive. So is the increasingly hated Data Protection Act. So are > Home Improvement Packs and fortnightly bin collections. > > In 15 years' time our Parliament will have only two functions left - > to raise taxes and declare war - admittedly things that our current > politicians are rather keen on. > > Mr Lilley's mischievous suggestion is that MPs' pay should be cut each > time they hand over authority to others. Incredibly, many MPs don't > know what is going on. If they ended up on the wages paid to district > councillors - which is all they really are now - they might care more. > > His own stark words cannot be improved upon: 'Few voters, or even > members of this house, fully realise how many powers have been, or are > about to be, transferred elsewhere. There are three reasons for this. > The first is that governments of all persuasions deny that any > significant powers are being transferred. > > The second is that, once powers have been transferred, Ministers > engage in a charade of pretence that they still retain those powers. > Even when introducing measures that they are obliged to bring in as a > result of an EU directive they behave as though the initiative were > their own. > > 'Indeed, Ministers often end up nobly accepting responsibility for > laws that they actually opposed when they were being negotiated in > Brussels.' > > So now you know. Not since Dunkirk, 68 years ago, has our national > independence been so imperilled. But back then, we could see the > danger. Now most of us pretend it isn't there. > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-truth-EU.html > > I've known about this 80% shit for years. Anyone who votes Lab, Con or > Lib is an absolute ignorant, thick cretin. They don't realise that > they are voting for a single party dictatorship. And then they have > the cheek to whinge that nothing ever changes! > > Most voters in the UK need to throw down the remote and heat magazine > and GET A CLUE. > > http://www.stormfront.org/forum/for...britain-39.html So what's wrong with the EUmaking the laws eather than taht bunch of sh*thead, w*nkers, and liars and idiots in the house of commons? We are up sh*t creek without a paddle financially, Europe is doing fine. We have rising poverty, record numbers in prison, less civil rights, higher taxes, more crime etc.... SO WHATS SO WRONG WITH EUROPE? What has the UK law makers ever done for me?? In one word F*CK-ALL. Bring on Europe. Stick a keg of powder under the HoP and blow the lot to kingdom come. That will be 660 less wasters we have to support, 660 less crooked expense fiddling criminals making unjust laws. Fook em. > |
|