![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain and cog wheels, chain rings and crank arms for that matter? Serious question. Has anyone snapped a chain in this manner? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"recycled" <u-lock@hotmail.com> wrote > > Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop > in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain and > cog wheels, chain rings and crank arms for that matter? > > Serious question. > > Has anyone snapped a chain in this manner? Who cares about the chain....has anyone snapped a knee? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <g32ubs$afk$1@news.datemas.de>,
"recycled" <u-lock@hotmail.com> writes: > > Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop in > a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain and cog > wheels, chain rings and crank arms for that matter? > > Serious question. > > Has anyone snapped a chain in this manner? In my own experience, I've broken more rear axles than chains. I really don't fully understand the dynamics of how it happens, but apparently (to me) it's the rear axle that bears the brunt of such stresses. Lower gears (in which it's easier to attain higher torque) seem to contribute more to axle breakage than higher gears. cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 15, 4:27 am, "recycled" <u-l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop in > a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain ... Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest when using your smallest chainring |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Rathman wrote:
>> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead >> stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the >> chain ... > Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest when > using your smallest chainring And MTB riders do that all the time with no ill effect. This sounds like one of those: "If I hang my bicycle from the front wheel, won't that ovalize it?" Troll! Jobst Brandt |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message
news:4855a4f9$0$17144$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net... > Peter Rathman wrote: > >>> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead >>> stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the >>> chain ... > >> Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest when >> using your smallest chainring > > And MTB riders do that all the time with no ill effect. This sounds > like one of those: > > "If I hang my bicycle from the front wheel, won't that ovalize it?" > > Troll! > > Jobst Brandt The one time I broke a chain was trying to pull away from a dead stop on a hill on my mtb, where I had arrived in far too high a gear as the road junction was immediately following a blind corner. I stood on the pedals and the chain snapped. Granted it was a new chain <200 miles, and therefore the problem was possibly a faulty chain, but it did break in the exact circumstance the op describes. pk |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message news:4855a4f9$0$17144$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net... > Peter Rathman wrote: > >>> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead >>> stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the >>> chain ... > >> Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest when >> using your smallest chainring > > And MTB riders do that all the time with no ill effect. This sounds > like one of those: > > "If I hang my bicycle from the front wheel, won't that ovalize it?" > > Troll! I hope you aren't suggesting that I'm a troll. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
someone wrote:
>>>> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a >>>> dead stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain >>>> on the chain ... Oops! lets look up the meaning of "stress" and "strain" first: http://www.m-w.com/ >>> Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest >>> when using your smallest chainring >> And MTB riders do that all the time with no ill effect. This >> sounds like one of those: >> "If I hang my bicycle from the front wheel, won't that ovalize it?" >> Troll! > The one time I broke a chain was trying to pull away from a dead > stop on a hill on my MTB, where I had arrived in far too high a gear > as the road junction was immediately following a blind corner. I > stood on the pedals and the chain snapped. Granted it was a new > chain <200 miles, and therefore the problem was possibly a faulty > chain, but it did break in the exact circumstance the op describes. Cut the fog! What broke? The way you say that it seems a side plate failed. If a pin extracted, it was most likely an installation assembly problem, the most common cause of chain separation. Lets not fuel the chain failure rumor mill! Jobst Brandt |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
anonymous wrote:
>>>> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a >>>> dead stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain >>>> on the chain ... >>> Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest >>> when using your smallest chainring >> And MTB riders do that all the time with no ill effect. This >> sounds like one of those: >> "If I hang my bicycle from the front wheel, won't that ovalize it?" >> Troll! > I hope you aren't suggesting that I'm a troll. You are a troll, possibly unwittingly. I suppose remainng anonymous helps you live with it. Jobst Brandt |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message
news:48569d6c$0$17236$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net... > someone wrote: >> The one time I broke a chain was trying to pull away from a dead >> stop on a hill on my MTB, where I had arrived in far too high a gear >> as the road junction was immediately following a blind corner. I >> stood on the pedals and the chain snapped. Granted it was a new >> chain <200 miles, and therefore the problem was possibly a faulty >> chain, but it did break in the exact circumstance the op describes. > > Cut the fog! What broke? The way you say that it seems a side plate > failed. If a pin extracted, it was most likely an installation > assembly problem, the most common cause of chain separation. > > Lets not fuel the chain failure rumor mill! > > Jobst Brandt Is there some fine point of semantics I am missing? Instead of being a continuous loop, my chain was a single length: ie it broke! I'm not particularly bothered if a joint failed or if a metal part snapped: the chain broke! pk |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 15, 7:27 am, "recycled" <u-l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop in > a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain and cog > wheels, chain rings and crank arms for that matter? > > Serious question. It should cause no problem. The tension in the chain isn't hard to calculate. Your crank arm has a radius of about 170mm. In "high gear," your chainring has a radius of about 100 mm. So to find chain tension in high gear, multiply your pedal force by 175/100. (The choice of rear cog doesn't matter.) And your pedal force is probably about equal to your weight in that situation. If you weigh 175 pounds, that's a chain tension of 306 lbs. It's worse when your chain's on a small front cog. A triple crank's small cog might have a radius of 50mm, so if you're standing hard on the pedal in that gear, you get about twice the chain tension: 612 lbs. And my chain's stood up to that situation thousands of times. > > Has anyone snapped a chain in this manner? I once broke a chain mountain biking, but never road riding. I was trying to grind past a sudden, steep obstacle and was in the process of changing to the smallest front cog. I imagine the bending & twisting of the chain during the shift is what tore the side plate off the pin. I've had to start in a high gear many, many times (and always kicked myself for forgetting to "pre-shift"). But it's never, ever harmed my chain. Don't worry. - Frank Krygowski |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 15, 6:27 am, "recycled" <u-l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop in > a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain and cog > wheels, chain rings and crank arms for that matter? > > Serious question. > > Has anyone snapped a chain in this manner? I can't believe that a bicycle chain can be broken by the weight of a human & a bicycle, regardless of the gearing. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message news:48569e2a$0$17236$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net... > recycled at u-lock@hotmail.com wrote: > >>>>> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a >>>>> dead stop in a high gear such that you are putting a large strain >>>>> on the chain ... > >>>> Note that the strain you can put on the chain will be greatest >>>> when using your smallest chainring > >>> And MTB riders do that all the time with no ill effect. This >>> sounds like one of those: > >>> "If I hang my bicycle from the front wheel, won't that ovalize it?" > >>> Troll! > >> I hope you aren't suggesting that I'm a troll. > > You are a troll, possibly unwittingly. I suppose remainng anonymous > helps you live with it. Believe what you wish. I had that thought whilst taking off from a traffic stop in a high gear and wondered about it. I'm sorry it doesn't meet your posting standards. I wonder what you find so trollish about the question. BTW: I do not post as 'anonymously'. I post as 'recycled' at email u-lock@hotmail.com and have done so on this ng for years. Though I haven't posted much at all recently. T'is true this is not my real name nor even a fake name that would have the appearance of a real name. I'm sorry that does not meet your posting standards either but I don't indiscrimately release personal information on the internet. Identity theft and net-cook cyber-stalkers might be a low order probability but I won't take that risk simply to please you or anyone else. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DennisTheBald wrote:
> On Jun 15, 6:27 am, "recycled" <u-l...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Is there any deleterious effect on a chain if you start from a dead stop in >>a high gear such that you are putting a large strain on the chain and cog >>wheels, chain rings and crank arms for that matter? >> >> Serious question. >> >> Has anyone snapped a chain in this manner? > > > I can't believe that a bicycle chain can be broken by the weight of a > human & a bicycle, regardless of the gearing. I had two SRAM PC-48 chains break at the side plates. I think its just cheap manufacturing for that model of chain. I now use PC-68s. Probably most likely chain failure is because the pin wasn't properly installed. Chains for the most part don't break, no matter how much torque you are able to apply to it. I stay away from "pinned" chains now too. The master link is much superior IMHO. SMH |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Stephen Harding wrote:
> DennisTheBald wrote: >> I can't believe that a bicycle chain can be broken by the weight of a >> human & a bicycle, regardless of the gearing. > > I had two SRAM PC-48 chains break at the side plates. > > I think its just cheap manufacturing for that model of > chain. I now use PC-68s. > > Probably most likely chain failure is because the pin > wasn't properly installed. Chains for the most part > don't break, no matter how much torque you are able to > apply to it. > > I stay away from "pinned" chains now too. The master > link is much superior IMHO. I've had god luck with the PC-48, never breaking one (out of perhaps a dozen) despite my weight (230), long cranks, low gear (20T on MTB) and often towing ~100lb trailers. I typically never repin a chain any more, no need to with quick links, but when I did, I found it was a pretty fussy job, you have to have a good tool and be very careful to get exactly the right amount of pin protruding on both sides of the late. |
|