![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there a list anywhere that rates marathons according to difficulty or toughness?
Skip |
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is a book available that rates different aspects of marathons including crowd support,
organization, weather, and course difficulty. I think it's called The Ultimate Guide to Marathons or something similar. -Keith Wm Chervak wrote: > Is there a list anywhere that rates marathons according to difficulty or toughness? > > Skip > > -- Keith Gemeinhart Technology Service Corp. Sebring, FL -- |
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Wm Chervak wrote:
> > Is there a list anywhere that rates marathons according to difficulty or toughness? > > Skip What do you consider difficult - running on 26.2 miles of flat pavement with 1000s of people yelling support (flat hurts some people's feet and people scared of crowds might view this as screaming in a claustrophobic environment , 7000 ft of elevation gain, rough footing, mud, running along cliffledges, crossing glacial rivers, less elevation gain but alternating up and down, high elevations, narrow pavement, lots of turns, running alone through quiet woods with no other runners around you and no crowd support, bears, gators, snow, cold, heat, no aid stations, .... (FWIW, these are all things I've seen listed on r.r or elsewhere as making things more challenging.) What's difficult for one person might be easy for another. What's easy for one might be the challenge of a lifetime for another. "Incidentally, Joe Henderson forwarded another marathon list that caught our eye. It is the "toughest marathons." Joe: "we (Rich Benyo as well) amassed a list in Marathon & Beyond magazine (January/February 2001). The top 10: (1) Nunavut Midnight Sun; (2) Pike's Peak; (3) Crater Lake; (4) NipMuck Trail; (5) Wyoming; (6) Deseret News; (7) Wild Wild West; (8) Jackson Hole Moose Chase; (9) Lake Geneva; (10) Big Sur." http://www.nwrunner.com/news/01-02-02Marathon_News.html (showed up in google search for "toughest marathons" - along with many other marathons not on this list that claim to be one of top 10 ![]() FWIW, I've seen marathons referred to as top-10 toughest or one of four or five toughest in US, etc, but until I just googled a couple minutes ago, I'd never seen an actual list - probably for the above reasons. And one that listed itself as one of top-four (watched this one last fall), I don't think is as challenging as several others I've since seen descriptions of (have not looked at descriptions of the ones above), but their courses might be considered easier for reasons other than simple elevation change. But the 3000+ft of elevation change would be a challenge for people that don't do their hill training. I made some comments earlier about arbitrariness of "tough marathons" in Jake Lee's thread on SF Chronicle marathon. YMMV. Dot -- "Success is different things to different people" -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope |
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Himalayan (Everest) $25,000 Pikes Peak Climb Anarctica $8,000
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Keith Gemeinhart <keithg@nospam.sebring.fl.us> wrote:
> There is a book available that rates different aspects of marathons including crowd support, > organization, weather, and course difficulty. I think it's called The Ultimate Guide to Marathons > or something similar. > -Keith > Wm Chervak wrote: >> Is there a list anywhere that rates marathons according to difficulty or toughness? >> >> Skip ---I don't know of a list, but I'd put the Trail Half Marathon this SUnday in Pinckney, MI pretty far up on the list. It's difficult enough that sub-3 for the guys will get you a free pair of shoes. I've heard you need to estimate your time by adding 25-30min onto your normal marathon. ANdy Hass |
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dot, thanks for including that quote below in your post. I was surprised to see the Deseret News
race listed as tough only because I had been led to believe somewhere that it was a fast course. It may be that the early climb before the mostly downhill second half, and the ridiculously early start (something like 5 a.m. I think), plus the dry air, might make it tougher than it looks. It's point to point which also means logistical issues. Thanks again. I would think that the race in NC where you run up a mountain (Bear Mountain? can't remember) and finish to bagpipe music at a Highlands festival would be on somebody's toughest list. chris Dot wrote: > ..."Incidentally, Joe Henderson forwarded another marathon list that caught > > our eye. It is the "toughest marathons." Joe: "we (Rich Benyo as well) amassed a list in Marathon > & Beyond magazine (January/February 2001). The top 10: (1) Nunavut Midnight Sun; (2) Pike's Peak; > (3) Crater Lake; (4) NipMuck Trail; (5) Wyoming; (6) Deseret News; (7) Wild Wild West; (8) Jackson > Hole Moose Chase; (9) Lake Geneva; (10) Big Sur." > http://www.nwrunner.com/news/01-02-02Marathon_News.html |
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
rick++ <rick303@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Himalayan (Everest) $25,000 there's two of them. one of them is the mt.everest challenge marathon. if this is the one that you're talking about, this is (only) $1490 for an 8-day trip. (they sell it as a package.) course record is 4:51. the other one is the everest marathon. this is 2000 british pounds. course record is 3:50. found this using google. jobs |
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Chris Smith wrote:
> > Dot, thanks for including that quote below in your post. I was surprised to see the Deseret News > race listed as tough only because I had been led to believe somewhere that it was a fast course. > It may be that the early climb before the mostly downhill second half, and the ridiculously early > start (something like 5 a.m. I think), plus the dry air, might make it tougher than it looks. It's > point to point which also means logistical issues. This is my whole point about these lists being arbitrary. That's why I've suggested to others to figure out what type of challenge or event they're looking for, then select among those to meet the level of challenge they want, rather than "toughest", hottest, etc. Another race is always going to be tougher, taller, hotter, colder, faster, etc. FWIW, I think 5am is actually a common start time, esp. for longer or hotter races (not up here), and I think some start at 4am. Thanks > again. I would think that the race in NC where you run up a mountain (Bear Mountain? can't > remember) and finish to bagpipe music at a Highlands festival would be on somebody's > toughest list. Grandfather mountain http://www.gmhg.org/wwwcgi/gmhgbuil...&event=marathon http://www.hopeformarrow.org/gmminfo.htm but I think it's mostly on road and in summer so some of the winter issues shouldn't be a concern. Their course record time is faster than the one in Fairbanks, but I have no idea whether they were set by comparable quality runners. I think there was some trail race there this winter, but can't remember if it was an ultra distance or ultra-level challenge (shorter distance, but rougher running or more elevation), but it sounded quite challenging (can't remember which group I read the report in, might have been on RW trail forum) because of the snow / ice and weather in general. In fact, I think the official race skipped part or stopped early or something. I've been on top Grandfather Mt when I was a kid - which must mean the road goes essentially to the top for my parents to have even considered going there ![]() I just took a quick look at a couple (not all) of these descriptions to get a feeling why they were on the list. I would definitely put Fall Equinox in Fbks ahead of a couple of those, at least based on their descriptions - more elevation gain, substantial part on trail, but also a fair amnt on pavement and dirt roads - diversity is part of its challenge. I couldn't find a web page for Nunavut, which makes it intriguing, esp. if it's the Nunavut I'm thinking of (NW Territories). Pike's Peak is one of the ones I was already familiar with that definitely rates being on the list, IMHO, not that anybody cares about MHO. Nipmuck also looks like it has a deserved reputation. But I got a hunch there's a bunch of small, challenging trail marathons in assorted places that the people that make these lists have never heard of. And if you get away from the marathon distance and consider races of shorter length, but longer times, as Andy (amh) points out, then it's a wide open field. There's just too many races in that category. Winners of the 14-miler out my kitchen window took 3+ hours last year by national-class runners. I think the last person came in in about 8 hours. No roads to shut down on mountain races And I know Colorado has a bunch.Dot -- "Success is different things to different people" -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope |