![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion:
Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well. I get about 1000 miles on them because every time I stop I put a foot down and that cleat will wear faster. Also you have to walk around toes-high using cleat covers otherwise you cannot stand safely on a slippery surface such as tile in the 7-11 as you're getting a softdrink. And strangely enough, they stopped making the best cleat covers. And now it also appears as if they've stopped making the "real" Look pedal and changed over to the Keo which is sort of a 3/4 scale version of the old one. Including smaller cleats. Which are still made out of the same plastic. Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths: Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely is a wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem. Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on cycling shoes. OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 16, 9:13*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion: > > Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they > provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're > disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well. I get about 1000 > miles on them because every time I stop I put a foot down and that cleat > will wear faster. Also you have to walk around toes-high using cleat covers > otherwise you cannot stand safely on a slippery surface such as tile in the > 7-11 as you're getting a softdrink. And strangely enough, they stopped > making the best cleat covers. And now it also appears as if they've stopped > making the "real" Look pedal and changed over to the Keo which is sort of a > 3/4 scale version of the old one. Including smaller cleats. Which are still > made out of the same plastic. > > Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's > I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's > just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other > pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep > soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on > floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. > > Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal > systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths: > Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite > rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The > wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal > turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely isa > wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that > uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem. > Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride > without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter > or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on > cycling shoes. > > OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. Try some Ultegra 6620's or Doo-race 77xx whatever the number is. Cleats are much better for walking, wear better than Look, at least the old Looks, too. They replaced the plastic 6610-style contact plate with metal on the 6620's, don't know if the springs, which don't last as well as I'd like with city riding (in, out, in, out) have been improved or not. Release is easy, in can be a little sticky but not if you do it right <g>. --D-y |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 16, 10:13*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion: > > Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they > provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're > disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well. I get about 1000 > miles on them because every time I stop I put a foot down and that cleat > will wear faster. Also you have to walk around toes-high using cleat covers > otherwise you cannot stand safely on a slippery surface such as tile in the > 7-11 as you're getting a softdrink. And strangely enough, they stopped > making the best cleat covers. And now it also appears as if they've stopped > making the "real" Look pedal and changed over to the Keo which is sort of a > 3/4 scale version of the old one. Including smaller cleats. Which are still > made out of the same plastic. > > Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's > I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's > just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other > pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep > soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on > floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. > > Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal > systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths: > Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite > rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The > wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal > turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely isa > wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that > uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem. > Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride > without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter > or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on > cycling shoes. > > OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. I have tried SPD, SPD-R, SPD-SL, and Speedplay Frogs. Of these, I prefer the SPD-SL. The plastic cleats do wear faster than the metal ones but I really like the larger platform as compared to regular ol' SPD. I am probably in the minority on this and will likely be excoriated for admitting it but I kind of liked the short-lived SPD- R. The platform was larger than the regular SPD and the metal cleats seemed to wear less than do the SPD-SL ones. If I go into 7-11 or some other such place for a refuel I just take my shoes off and walk in with socks. Saves the cleats, the annoying clack-clack-clack, and helps reduce the chances of my slipping onto my pasty white ass in the midst of all the Slurpee drinkers and Big Bite eaters. Never tried any flavor of LOOK or Crank Bros. pedal systems but both seem to be fairly ubiquitous. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 17, 4:13*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion: > > Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they > provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're > disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well. I get about 1000 > miles on them because every time I stop I put a foot down and that cleat > will wear faster. Also you have to walk around toes-high using cleat covers > otherwise you cannot stand safely on a slippery surface such as tile in the > 7-11 as you're getting a softdrink. And strangely enough, they stopped > making the best cleat covers. And now it also appears as if they've stopped > making the "real" Look pedal and changed over to the Keo which is sort of a > 3/4 scale version of the old one. Including smaller cleats. Which are still > made out of the same plastic. > > Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's > I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's > just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other > pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep > soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on > floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. > > Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal > systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths: > Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite > rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The > wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal > turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely isa > wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that > uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem. > Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride > without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter > or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on > cycling shoes. > > OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. I used to use Look, when that was the only game in town. Same likes and dislikes as you. I use SPD on my mountain bike, and I really like the stomp-n-go way they work, but the connection is too sloppy for my tastes. I put up with is on the MTB because MTB rides are so all over the place that I don't really notice the sloppieness. On the road I use SPD-SL with the red no-float cleats. Nice positive engagement, wide platform, and the outriggers on the cleats mean the on pedal feel doesn't deteriorate from walking wear. They suck for walking in gas stations and such, but I just take it easy to avoid slipping. Or better yet, I avoid stopping! Joseph |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 16, 8:13*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion: > > Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they > provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're > disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well. I get about 1000 > miles on them because every time I stop I put a foot down and that cleat > will wear faster. Also you have to walk around toes-high using cleat covers > otherwise you cannot stand safely on a slippery surface such as tile in the > 7-11 as you're getting a softdrink. And strangely enough, they stopped > making the best cleat covers. And now it also appears as if they've stopped > making the "real" Look pedal and changed over to the Keo which is sort of a > 3/4 scale version of the old one. Including smaller cleats. Which are still > made out of the same plastic. > > Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's > I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's > just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other > pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep > soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on > floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. > > Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal > systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths: > Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite > rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The > wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal > turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely isa > wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that > uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem. > Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride > without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter > or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on > cycling shoes. > > OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. Speedplay Zero. Best pedal I have used. Double sided, very servicable, light, great corner clearance, easy entry/exit. Adjustable float, plus most adjustable cleat. Only 'other' is the cleats are expensive but not surprising since all the 'mechanism' is really in the cleat, not the pedal. Switched from Campagnolo Profit to these. Put the cleat in the same place, no adjustment required. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
> Speedplay Zero. Best pedal I have used. Double sided, very servicable, > light, great corner clearance, easy entry/exit. Adjustable float, plus > most adjustable cleat. > How are the cleats for walking? I used Look for years, but now like SPD. Art Harris |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 17, 7:27*am, Art Harris <n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote: > > > Speedplay Zero. Best pedal I have used. Double sided, very servicable, > > light, great corner clearance, easy entry/exit. Adjustable float, plus > > most adjustable cleat. > > How are the cleats for walking? > > I used Look for years, but now like SPD. > > Art Harris Well, they are big-ish road cleats like all others but with a metal plate, that you walk on. I think it is a mistake to choose road pedals as to ease or difficulty or wear due to walking. No road cleat 'ought' to bewalked on or at least minimized BUT SP does have a metal plate that hits the ground first. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion: > > OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. > SPD's, especially my beloved 747's. I only use dual-sided and multi-release cleats, both on & off road. I have used Wellgo clones, but the authentic Shimano are smoother in & out and much more durable. Cleats last almost forever, even with a lot of hike a bike in gravel & rocks. I never pull out and have never trapped a foot in a fall. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Qui si parla Campagnolo" <peter@vecchios.com> wrote in message
news:47990cce-d768-4201-84b5-4f2136defa8b@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > Speedplay Zero. Best pedal I have used. Double sided, very servicable, > light, great corner clearance, easy entry/exit. My brother prefers Speedplay but he bought a new set of Zeros and couldn't get into them. Eventually he sold them off but still uses Speedplay X pedals. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <peter@vecchios.com> wrote in message > news:47990cce-d768-4201-84b5-4f2136defa8b@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com... >> Speedplay Zero. Best pedal I have used. Double sided, very >> servicable, light, great corner clearance, easy entry/exit. > > My brother prefers Speedplay but he bought a new set of Zeros and > couldn't get into them. Eventually he sold them off but still uses > Speedplay X pedals. Did he change his cleats? Pretty sure the two platforms use different mechanisms. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:13:39 -0700, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.
com> wrote: [---] >Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's >I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's >just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other >pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep >soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on >floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. Try some SIDI shoes. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Andrew Price <ajprice@free.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:13:39 -0700, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. > com> wrote: > [---] > >Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's > >I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. Perhaps it's > >just the pedals I have. Strengths: they don't seem any better than any other > >pedal I've used. Weaknesses: even though I have an off-road shoe with deep > >soles the cleats still stick up a little above them. This makes marks on > >floors and also makes them quite slippery if you're not careful. > Try some SIDI shoes. You don't mention which SIDI shoes. The "Dominator" sole might be tall enough to hide the SPD cleat, but it is as slippery as snot. I almost broke my leg once when I stopped to relieve myself in a storm drain, not wanting to leave evidence on the road. My shoe slipped on the dry metal grate and I came to a rest with my thigh wedged into the curb opening, my lower leg nd foot dangling into the void. -- Bill Bushnell http://pobox.com/~bushnell/ |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <Q_mdndYasZZPgMrVnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote: > I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion: > > Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they > provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're > disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well. > Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's > I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along. > Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal > systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths: > Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite > rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The > wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal > turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely is a > wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that > uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem. > Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride > without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter > or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on > cycling shoes. > > OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries. Hardly a coincidence given their popularity, but these are also the three systems I have tried. I started on SPDs, and they worked fine for me in almost all circumstances. I still recommend them (and compatible clones) to anyone as the default clipless choice, if only due to cost and availability. I tried Looks next, mainly because I got some cleats and shoes cheap. They were fine. I eventually decided that they had no advantages for me over SPDs, and I couldn't walk in them, and the cleats wear fast. Since I sometimes ride bikes to places and dismount at my destination, I felt this was a huge pain. Crank Brothers: first, I've tried two of the platformed pedals (Candy and Smarty) as well as one of the Egg Beater types. The Candy/Smarty design is much easier to ride on, to the extent that I have no qualms about treating them as flat pedals and riding those bikes in normal shoes. The Egg Beater-equipped bike takes a bit of care, and I find that missing pedal entry on the Egg Beater can be consequential (as in, foot rolls off pedal) in a way that is rare in other pedals. Also, Crank Bros pedals have a rep for wearing shoe soles, which seems largely alleviated by their plastic (and now metal) inserts that are meant to fit between cleat and shoe. It shouldn't matter, but when my SPD-using father caught sight of my Egg Beaters, he was fascinated. The aesthetics of that pedal are very high. Aside from those provisos, Crank Brothers pedals are, in my opinion, very similar to SPDs, and I wouldn't recommend changing to them except for one thing: I race cyclocross. CX demands pedals where you ride through mud, stomp your feet through mud, then jump on the pedals and get instant mud clearance and return to normal operation. SPDs balk at this unreasonable treatment. Crank Brothers pedals (and, apparently, Time ATACs) do not. This is, in my opinion, an extraordinary requirement for a pedal. However, I saw Peter disparaging walkable shoes down-thread, and I think that's wildly misguided. The more I use walkable shoes, the more I like walkable shoes, and the more I use my bikes in circumstances where unwalkable shoes would be a pain. In short, I do a fair bit of multi-modal commuting, including occasionally taking light rail part way to local bike races, or little shopping trips, or whatever. Walkable shoes mean these sorts of things are no-brainers: even my stiff-soled Adidas Marathons are not too bad. In practice, I find that just about the time when I think it would be too far to walk in walkable shoes, it turns out I can get back on my bike and ride there. On the other hand, unwalkable shoes mean that every staircase or smooth surface between me and my destination is a terror. On at least one occassion, walkable shoes even made my club ride easier: a tiny chunk of our ride was closed to road traffic by some large concrete barriers. The rest of the riders looked on in horror as I jumped up onto a barrier carrying my bike and then hopped off on the other side. It's only in retrospect that I realized my compatriots could hardly attempt same. -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@gmail.com http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 17, 8:43*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <pe...@vecchios.com> wrote in messagenews:47990cce-d768-4201-84b5-4f2136defa8b@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > > Speedplay Zero. Best pedal I have used. Double sided, very servicable, > > light, great corner clearance, easy entry/exit. > > My brother prefers Speedplay but he bought a new set of Zeros and couldn't > get into them. Eventually he sold them off but still uses Speedplay X > pedals. The plate and hence the cleat needs to be flat, flat. If it is bowed at all it is hard to get into and really tough to get out of. Since the pedal engages the spring in the cleat a bit differently than X series, it is more critical. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Time road pedals, the new ones not the old style. Better feel, easier
dis-engagement than Look. Can't pull out by accident, unlike Look or SPD. Nice wide platform . Decent amount of float. Lateral adjustment. Walkable without covers even on tile. Not that much walking is a good idea. |
|