![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <uq7e54l3409qp36vhnko318aiafpnjjln0@4ax.com>,
!Jones <hi@there.org> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:34:51 -0500, in rec.bicycles.tech "Edward > Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote: > > >Usenet will soon be as dead as a door nail. It has no redeeming features > >whatsoever. It only existed for as long as it did because it was based on a > >new technology that fascinated everyone. > > Actually, it is based on a protocol that predates TCP/IP. By Internet > standards, it's ancient... its roots are in the earliest propagation > algorithms of MILNET; it was fully functional by around '78 or so. > Far from being "a new technology that fascinat[s] everyone", Usenet is > an anachronism! Seven bit ascii? No mark up? No images? Disgusting! -- Michael Press |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:40:03 -0700, Michael Press wrote:
> Seven bit ascii? No mark up? No images? Disgusting! But all ones realy needs to communicate the esscence of your point. |
|