Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Pics of Campa 11 speed

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-06.-2008, 05:48 PM   #1
Derk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pics of Campa 11 speed

  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 08:06 PM   #2
joseph.santaniello@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On Jun 18, 10:48*am, Derk <nob...@invalid.org> wrote:
> http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...olo-2009-ergopo...
>
> Derk


At the risk of sounding like that guy who figured the world would
never have need of more than 5 or 6 computers, why do we need 11 cogs?
10 is a nice round number and I was hoping it would be settled upon
for a while. This strikes me as somewhat like the whole Ultra-torque
business; different just to be different. The Ergos do look quite
nice, er... I don't mean they look nice, I mean they look very
functional and well designed. But I must say I've had it with special
accomodations for mani piccole! Lets have some for mani grande!

Joseph

PS: I still want it anyway ;-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 08:42 PM   #3
John Forrest Tomlinson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT),
"joseph.santaniello@gmail.com" <joseph.santaniello@gmail.com> wrote:

>At the risk of sounding like that guy who figured the world would
>never have need of more than 5 or 6 computers, why do we need 11 cogs?


Need is a strong word, but here's why I would like it

12 13 14 15 16 17 19 21 23 25 28



  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 09:26 PM   #4
Qui si parla Campagnolo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On Jun 18, 5:06*am, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
<joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 10:48*am, Derk <nob...@invalid.org> wrote:
>
> >http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...olo-2009-ergopo...

>
> > Derk

>
> At the risk of sounding like that guy who figured the world would
> never have need of more than 5 or 6 computers, why do we need 11 cogs?
> 10 is a nice round number and I was hoping it would be settled upon
> for a while. This strikes me as somewhat like the whole Ultra-torque
> business; different just to be different. The Ergos do look quite
> nice, er... I don't mean they look nice, I mean they look very
> functional and well designed. But I must say I've had it with special
> accomodations for mani piccole! Lets have some for mani grande!
>
> Joseph
>
> PS: I still want it anyway ;-)


UT was a response to the misconception that square taper cranks and
BBs were somehow flawed, and the market shunned them because of the
media fawning over all new and different. BUT at least it's a better
design than all the other 'spindle thru with left crank arm bolted on'
designs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 09:38 PM   #5
Adam Kadlubek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On 18 Cze, 13:06, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
<joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 10:48 am, Derk <nob...@invalid.org> wrote:
>
> >http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...olo-2009-ergopo...

>
> > Derk

>
> At the risk of sounding like that guy who figured the world would
> never have need of more than 5 or 6 computers, why do we need 11 cogs?


12-13-14-15-16-18-20-23-26-30-34 single chainring goodness.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 10:17 PM   #6
phs123@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On 18 Jun., 13:06, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
<joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The Ergos do look quite
> nice, er... I don't mean they look nice, I mean they look very
> functional and well designed. But I must say I've had it with special
> accomodations for mani piccole! Lets have some for mani grande!


Try to look at image 6. There seems to be a shim for people with big
hands:
"Per le mani grandi è disponibile anche un supporto che permette
maggiore appoggio"

Or picture 4:
"Presa migliore per le mani grandi: questa è la mano di Indurain!"

Interesting to see that not only Super Record but also Chorus and
Record will be 11 speed.

I was hoping that the 2009 series would re-introduce a "silver" Record
hub, but from all the black and dark gray parts I see on the pictures,
my hope is fading.


--
Regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 10:24 PM   #7
Tom Kunich
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

"Derk" <nobody@invalid.org> wrote in message
news:4858cb30$0$14344$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...cord-e-11speed/


Campagnolo has gone completely over the top. Looks like I'll be switching
most of my stuff over to Shimano 9-speed with barend shifters.

  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 10:51 PM   #8
phs123@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On 18 Jun., 15:24, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

> Campagnolo has gone completely over the top. Looks like I'll be switching
> most of my stuff over to Shimano 9-speed with barend shifters.


Why? Centaur and below will still be 10 speed, and the Veloce series
doesn't have any carbon in it, if that is what bothering you.

Regarding Shimano; from 2009 Shimano will start to ship Dura Ace
shifters and derailleurs that are incompatible with "old" Shimano
systems (new cable pull ratio like Sram's shifters). Ultegra and 105
will follow soon after. So in a near future only Sora/Tiagra
derailleurs will work with 9 speed bar end shifters, and after a
couple of years they too will be upgraded. So 9 speed Shimano is a
dead end.

--
Regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 10:56 PM   #9
jim beam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
> On Jun 18, 5:06�am, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
> <joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 18, 10:48�am, Derk <nob...@invalid.org> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...olo-2009-ergopo...
>>> Derk

>> At the risk of sounding like that guy who figured the world would
>> never have need of more than 5 or 6 computers, why do we need 11 cogs?
>> 10 is a nice round number and I was hoping it would be settled upon
>> for a while. This strikes me as somewhat like the whole Ultra-torque
>> business; different just to be different. The Ergos do look quite
>> nice, er... I don't mean they look nice, I mean they look very
>> functional and well designed. But I must say I've had it with special
>> accomodations for mani piccole! Lets have some for mani grande!
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>> PS: I still want it anyway ;-)

>
> UT was a response to the misconception that square taper cranks and
> BBs were somehow flawed,


you can achieve more strength [and stiffness] for less weight with a
large hollow tube than you can a small [solid] rod. basic math.


> and the market shunned them because of the
> media fawning over all new and different. BUT at least it's a better
> design than all the other 'spindle thru with left crank arm bolted on'
> designs.

  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 11:03 PM   #10
JG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

> 12-13-14-15-16-18-20-23-26-30-34 single chainring goodness.

You could achieve the same thing with a 12-23 8 speed against a
compact double. Smaller, stronger cassette, against a front
derailleur, shifter, and chain ring...

JG



  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06.-2008, 11:40 PM   #11
joseph.santaniello@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On Jun 18, 3:17*pm, phs...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 18 Jun., 13:06, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
>
> <joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Ergos do look quite
> > nice, er... I don't mean they look nice, I mean they look very
> > functional and well designed. But I must say I've had it with special
> > accomodations for mani piccole! Lets have some for mani grande!

>
> Try to look at image 6. There seems to be a shim for people with big
> hands:
> "Per le mani grandi è disponibile anche un supporto che permette
> maggiore appoggio"
>
> Or picture 4:
> "Presa migliore per le mani grandi: questa è la mano di Indurain!"


Funny I didn't bother reading the caption on that one. When I first
saw it, I thought, gee look how small the levers are even for one of
those Caisse d'Epargne twerps!

Joseph
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06.-2008, 12:17 AM   #12
Lou Holtman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Derk" <nobody@invalid.org> wrote in message
> news:4858cb30$0$14344$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>> http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...cord-e-11speed/
>>

>
> Campagnolo has gone completely over the top. Looks like I'll be
> switching most of my stuff over to Shimano 9-speed with barend shifters.



Just to PO Campagnolo? They OFFER 11 speed, they don't put a gun to your
head to buy it.

Lou
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06.-2008, 12:35 AM   #13
landotter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

On Jun 18, 8:56Â*am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 5:06�am, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
> > <joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 18, 10:48�am, Derk <nob...@invalid.org> wrote:

>
> >>>http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...olo-2009-ergopo....
> >>> Derk
> >> At the risk of sounding like that guy who figured the world would
> >> never have need of more than 5 or 6 computers, why do we need 11 cogs?
> >> 10 is a nice round number and I was hoping it would be settled upon
> >> for a while. This strikes me as somewhat like the whole Ultra-torque
> >> business; different just to be different. The Ergos do look quite
> >> nice, er... I don't mean they look nice, I mean they look very
> >> functional and well designed. But I must say I've had it with special
> >> accomodations for mani piccole! Lets have some for mani grande!

>
> >> Joseph

>
> >> PS: I still want it anyway ;-)

>
> > UT was a response to the misconception that square taper cranks and
> > BBs were somehow flawed,

>
> you can achieve more strength [and stiffness] for less weight with a
> large hollow tube than you can a small [solid] rod. Â*basic math.
>


Basic physics: if you twist the ends of a pop can it goes smooshy
smooshy. Not so with a piece of rebar. Next...

  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06.-2008, 01:25 AM   #14
Mike Jacoubowsky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

"Derk" <nobody@invalid.org> wrote in message
news:4858cb30$0$14344$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
|
http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...cord-e-11speed/
|
| Derk

Do the levers whistle at high speeds? Can you tune those slots?

It's a semi-serious question, given that helmets whistle sometimes...

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06.-2008, 01:40 AM   #15
Dave Lehnen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pics of Campa 11 speed

landotter wrote:
> On Jun 18, 8:56 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>
>>Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Jun 18, 5:06�am, "joseph.santanie...@gmail.com"
>>><joseph.santanie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Jun 18, 10:48�am, Derk <nob...@invalid.org> wrote:

>>
>>>>>http://www.guidorubino.com/technews...olo-2009-ergopo...


>>
>>>UT was a response to the misconception that square taper cranks and
>>>BBs were somehow flawed,

>>
>>you can achieve more strength [and stiffness] for less weight with a
>>large hollow tube than you can a small [solid] rod. basic math.
>>

>
>
> Basic physics: if you twist the ends of a pop can it goes smooshy
> smooshy. Not so with a piece of rebar. Next...
>


Torsional strength-to-weight increases for a tube as the wall thickness
decreases, up to the point when buckling happens at the same time as
yield. Stiffness-to-weight in the elastic range continues to increase,
but is useless if the required strength isn't there. The pop can's wall
thickness is far too small for optimum strength-to-weight, while the
rebar, with zero inner diameter, has far too thick a "wall".

Dave Lehnen

  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com