![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him,
with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was right on the money. Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. <more there> Bill C |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote:
> While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, > with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was > right on the money. > Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being > mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. > > http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p > > New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive > Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis > Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 > Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally > rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a > government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a > "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which > has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why you're awarding the medal... R |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
news:9178567b-ebb9-4abb-9098-d966eac4b768@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com... | On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote: | > While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, | > with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was | > right on the money. | > Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being | > mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. | > | > http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p | > | > New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive | > Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis | > Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 | > Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally | > rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a | > government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a | > "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which | > has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. | | That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way | saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human | activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why | you're awarding the medal... | | R Agreed. Biofuels, when not derived from waste product, are an abomination and an insult to humanity. The idea that it's more important to feed our cars than our mouths... what could be more absurd? And not only do the economics not work out, but it's tough to show that you're actually gaining energy too, after you factor in everything that goes into growing crops. But as you say, what does this have to do with awarding points to TK? His attitude is simply that global warming itself is a myth. The only reason he'd care about biofuels is if it puts cheaper gas into his tank. Not that there's anything wrong with that concept, to a point. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 10:23*am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 9:47*am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > > > > That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way > > saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human > > activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why > > you're awarding the medal... > > > R- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate > discussion. <snip> Dumbass - You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be less corn for food. Duh. And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 2:42 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 10:23 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote: > > On Jun 19, 9:47 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > > > That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way > > > saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human > > > activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why > > > you're awarding the medal... > > > The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate > > discussion. > > You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? > > It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be > less corn for food. Duh. > > And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. You're getting soft in your old age. I don't support corn based corn subsidies, corn fed beef, beef fed beef and lots of other it-seemed- like-a-good-idea-at-the-time idiocies. R |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 11:42*am, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. You don't have a choice but to support them. I support afternoon training rides, but not willingly. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 11:54*am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2:42 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 10:23 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 9:47 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > > > > That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. *Tom way > > > > saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human > > > > activity has no effect on the planet's climate. *So I'm not sure why > > > > you're awarding the medal... > > > > The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate > > > discussion. > > > You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? > > > It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be > > less corn for food. Duh. > > > And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. > > You're getting soft in your old age. *I don't support corn based corn > subsidies, corn fed beef, beef fed beef and lots of other it-seemed- > like-a-good-idea-at-the-time idiocies. Could I get you to support killing piggies and destroying crops? Such policies grow the middle class. Could I get you to support "old"-age retirement benefits? You know, if less people are producing, then more will be produced. That will grow the middle class. Less is more, you know. "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength." --- George Orwell, "1984" |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 6:47*am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. * It was made light of. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength." > --- George Orwell, "1984" "Cadence is a red herring." --- Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 3:15 pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 11:54 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 19, 2:42 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 19, 10:23 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > > On Jun 19, 9:47 am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way > > > > > saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human > > > > > activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why > > > > > you're awarding the medal... > > > > > The biofuels, and their effect on food production were a seperate > > > > discussion. > > > > You want to give that moron a medal for that conclusion? > > > > It's a given: if corn is used for a non-food purpose, there will be > > > less corn for food. Duh. > > > > And no, I don't support corn based ethanol subsidies. > > > You're getting soft in your old age. I don't support corn based corn > > subsidies, corn fed beef, beef fed beef and lots of other it-seemed- > > like-a-good-idea-at-the-time idiocies. > > Could I get you to support killing piggies and destroying crops? Such > policies grow the middle class. If you're talking about killing my toes, no. If you're talking about reducing the cultivated biomass, yes. Too many people anyway. > Could I get you to support "old"-age retirement benefits? You know, > if less people are producing, then more will be produced. That will > grow the middle class. You could get me to support Logan's Run-esque culling of the naked ape herd. > Less is more, you know. You're telling this to a group of bike racing dweebs, whose idea of physical perfection looks much like it walked out of Auschwitz, and who obsess over extra grams of weight on their bikes? Why? R |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 3:30 pm, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
wrote: > SLAVE of THE STATE wrote: > > > "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength." > > --- George Orwell, "1984" > > "Cadence is a red herring." > --- Benjamin Franklin Cadence was the only quasi-acceptable Charlie Sheen movie. - me R |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
RicodJour wrote:
> On Jun 19, 9:36 am, Bill C <tritonri...@verizon.net> wrote: >> While just about everyone lined up and relentlessly hammered on him, >> with just a few allowing they had some doubt, he was the one who was >> right on the money. >> Hope he doesn't hold his breathe waiting for folks to admit being >> mistaken, since I happen to like having him around. >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6mnu2p >> >> New study to force ministers to review climate change planExclusive >> Official review admits biofuel role in food crisis >> Julian Borger and John Vidal The Guardian, Thursday June 19 2008 >> Article historyBritain and Europe will be forced to fundamentally >> rethink a central part of their environment strategy after a >> government report found that the rush to develop biofuels has played a >> "significant" role in the dramatic rise in global food prices, which >> has left 100 million more people without enough to eat. > > That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. Tom way > saying that the whole global warming thing is a myth and that human > activity has no effect on the planet's climate. So I'm not sure why > you're awarding the medal... Tom's not always wrong, but he too frequently adopts a shotgun approach. Throws a whole bunch of arguments out at once, then switches back and forth between them. Every month or so, Bill comes across something that validates one of Tom's thousands of arguments. Then he gets confused and thinks it validates them all. Or something, I don't get it. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 4:38*pm, Fred Fredburger
<FredFredbur...@Where.Are.The.Nachos> wrote: > > Every month or so, Bill comes across something that validates one of > Tom's thousands of arguments. Then he gets confused and thinks it > validates them all. Or something, I don't get it. If the we-meme operates strongly enough, then confusion is not erased but automatically bypassed. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 19, 12:28*pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 6:47*am, RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote: > > > That biofuels are a two-edged sword was never disputed. * > > It was made light of. Kun-Kun claimed that greenies wanted to fight global warming by taking drastic measures that would genocidally kill off many people in the third world. Eventually, I think he explained that this would happen because greenies -> biofuels -> increase in crop prices. Since biofuels are neither a serious proposed solution to global warming nor particularly beloved by greenies anymore (ADM, Supermarket to the World likes them though), this had an definite whiff of the Chewbacca Defense. http://groups.google.com/group/rec....ab7886166c64ad1 http://groups.google.com/group/rec....ab7a46983dcaf1c Ben |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> I support afternoon training rides, but not willingly. As a sponsor at least you don't need to worry about your image if your primates train on enhanced mineral water. |
|