Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


10 speed to 10 speed

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25-06.-2008, 03:53 PM   #1
Roger Merriman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 10 speed to 10 speed

I've got a old (86) 10 speed racer that i picked up for peanuts, which i
like, bar the friction gear shifters, or rather the rear shifter, thus
the bike will be moving to new drive chain, i was going to go for 9
speed but any reason why 10 or 8 could have advantages.

i was going to go for a compact and try to get a cassette with a fair
range, so that if i take it back to the gorge in wales i stand a chance
of getting up the hills and like wise if rocketing the downs have
enought gears.

roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-06.-2008, 08:58 PM   #2
Pete Biggs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 speed to 10 speed

Roger Merriman wrote:
> I've got a old (86) 10 speed racer that i picked up for peanuts,
> which i like, bar the friction gear shifters, or rather the rear
> shifter, thus the bike will be moving to new drive chain, i was going
> to go for 9 speed but any reason why 10 or 8 could have advantages.


8 might be cheaper. 10 would provide smaller jumps between the gears, or a
wider range with the same jumps. 9 would be the best compromise in terms of
functionality and cost, including running costs. 10-speed chains are
expensive.

First of all, there is the issue of hub width and frame spacing. Road hubs
that take 8/9/10-speed cassettes are 130mm, where as older bikes were
designed for 120 to 126mm hubs. You'll be able to spring or bend the stays
to take a modern hub.
See http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html

> i was going to go for a compact and try to get a cassette with a fair
> range, so that if i take it back to the gorge in wales i stand a
> chance of getting up the hills and like wise if rocketing the downs
> have enought gears.


Good idea. A triple shouldn't be out of the question, either.

~PB


  Reply With Quote
Old 25-06.-2008, 10:12 PM   #3
Roger Merriman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 speed to 10 speed

Pete Biggs <p@pomegranateremovehighlyimpracticalfruitbiggs.tc> wrote:

> Roger Merriman wrote:
> > I've got a old (86) 10 speed racer that i picked up for peanuts,
> > which i like, bar the friction gear shifters, or rather the rear
> > shifter, thus the bike will be moving to new drive chain, i was going
> > to go for 9 speed but any reason why 10 or 8 could have advantages.

>
> 8 might be cheaper. 10 would provide smaller jumps between the gears, or a
> wider range with the same jumps. 9 would be the best compromise in terms of
> functionality and cost, including running costs. 10-speed chains are
> expensive.
>

that was my hunch but wasn't sure. 9 it is then i don't tend to twidle
the gears that much so a close ratio isn't that much use for me, more
intrested in a bigger spread ie low enought to crawl up 20% or worse and
high enought to thunder down the other side.

> First of all, there is the issue of hub width and frame spacing. Road hubs
> that take 8/9/10-speed cassettes are 130mm, where as older bikes were
> designed for 120 to 126mm hubs. You'll be able to spring or bend the stays
> to take a modern hub.
> See http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html


yes it's a old 126mm steel frame so will have to be sprung etc.

>
> > i was going to go for a compact and try to get a cassette with a fair
> > range, so that if i take it back to the gorge in wales i stand a
> > chance of getting up the hills and like wise if rocketing the downs
> > have enought gears.

>
> Good idea. A triple shouldn't be out of the question, either.
>

true though that really does mean flightdeck rather than downtube
shifters, and a compact should give me the gears with a low enought
cassette to possibly even get the evil hill nr my folks place, though it
has just been resurfaced so that will lessen it a bit.

> ~PB


cheers

roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-06.-2008, 10:12 PM   #4
Pete Biggs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 speed to 10 speed

Roger Merriman wrote:

>> Good idea. A triple shouldn't be out of the question, either.
>>

> true though that really does mean flightdeck rather than downtube
> shifters, and a compact should give me the gears with a low enought
> cassette to possibly even get the evil hill nr my folks place, though
> it has just been resurfaced so that will lessen it a bit.


There's no reason why you can't use a triple chainset with downtube levers.
I think all "indexed" downtube sets have a non-indexed left-hand lever.
Certainly some do anyway. Any friction lever will have enough travel for a
triple front mech.

~PB


  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06.-2008, 04:31 AM   #5
Roger Merriman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 speed to 10 speed

Pete Biggs <p@pomegranateremovehighlyimpracticalfruitbiggs.tc> wrote:

> Roger Merriman wrote:
>
> >> Good idea. A triple shouldn't be out of the question, either.
> >>

> > true though that really does mean flightdeck rather than downtube
> > shifters, and a compact should give me the gears with a low enought
> > cassette to possibly even get the evil hill nr my folks place, though
> > it has just been resurfaced so that will lessen it a bit.

>
> There's no reason why you can't use a triple chainset with downtube levers.
> I think all "indexed" downtube sets have a non-indexed left-hand lever.
> Certainly some do anyway. Any friction lever will have enough travel for a
> triple front mech.
>
> ~PB


Ooh really i had assumed not, might well be a option i shall mull over
it as you where.

roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com