![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all:
The bottom bracket on the bike I'm fixing up for my daughter uses a nut instead of a bolt to secure the crank to the square taper axle. I seem to recall that torque values on nutted bottom brackets are different (higher?) then the torque typically used on bottom brackets that use bolts, but I'm not finding anything that confirms this. All the torque value tables I've found just specify "bolt" bottom bracket torque but don't mention "nut" torque. Is my recollection wrong? TIA Tom Young |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
TomYoung wrote:
> Hi all: > > The bottom bracket on the bike I'm fixing up for my daughter uses a > nut instead of a bolt to secure the crank to the square taper axle. I > seem to recall that torque values on nutted bottom brackets are > different (higher?) then the torque typically used on bottom brackets > that use bolts, but I'm not finding anything that confirms this. All > the torque value tables I've found just specify "bolt" bottom bracket > torque but don't mention "nut" torque. > > Is my recollection wrong? My dim recollection is that "nut torque" was spec'd /lower/ than "bolt torque" for BB spindles, but it's been so long since I've seen the spec, I wouldn't depend on that recollection. Mark J. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Young wrote:
> The bottom bracket on the bike I'm fixing up for my daughter uses a > nut instead of a bolt to secure the crank to the square taper axle. > I seem to recall that torque values on nutted bottom brackets are > different (higher?) then the torque typically used on bottom > brackets that use bolts, but I'm not finding anything that confirms > this. All the torque value tables I've found just specify "bolt" > bottom bracket torque but don't mention "nut" torque. > Is my recollection wrong? All high quality BB spindles I have seen use bolts and have a through bore while less expensive spindles are black, have poorly finished bearing races and possibly are poorer material because heat treating a piece of varying cross section is less practical. Torque, if different, would reasonably be lower than with bolts for two reasons. If a bolt breaks the stub can readily be removed and a new high quality bolt used. The threaded extension of a one piece spindle is most likely not as strong and if it fails the spindle is scrap. Jobst Brandt |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
TomYoung wrote:
> The bottom bracket on the bike I'm fixing up for my daughter uses a > nut instead of a bolt to secure the crank to the square taper axle. I > seem to recall that torque values on nutted bottom brackets are > different (higher?) then the torque typically used on bottom brackets > that use bolts, but I'm not finding anything that confirms this. All > the torque value tables I've found just specify "bolt" bottom bracket > torque but don't mention "nut" torque. > Is my recollection wrong? SR Suntour book says "400 kcm" for nutted spindles which is about 28~30 ft lb, 40 Nm. Lube the threads and nut face well. I lube tapers, others do not; your call. -- Andrew Muzi <www.yellowjersey.org/> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|