![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 189
|
Hey guys, ok we're all familiar with FTP, 2 x 20's, 3 x 20's sweet spot rides etc. Are there any new discoveries that you guys would care to share. Obviously I'm interested in increasing threshold power particularly with workouts of two hours or less. Thanks in advance
![]()
__________________
http://theademerckx2008racingfiles.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
|
They're not new and I don't know if you've tried them yet, but I've been getting consistent and sustained results with over/unders. I'll alternate doing a minute at 10% above and below FTP for whatever time interval I decide. You can vary these as you see fit...percentage, time above/below, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 92
|
Have no idea if they are effective but have setup on the home trainer some "steps", basically just increasing power every minute or 5 minutes or whatever by say 20 watts at a time to 30% above FTP then bringing down again.
Current one I am using stars at 150 watts and goes up 20 watts every 30 secs and down again by the same margin, peaking at 410 watts. Hurts, a lot.
__________________
Ride like you mean it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 80
|
Nothing new under the sun as Tony said but I had a great workout last sunday. I started riding without better plan. It was a really heavy wind and I had to push to keep the bike moving so I ended up riding just a bit under FTP-level. First I thought 40 minutes would be good but once I got there I decided to go for an hour. At that point I didn't even look at the time but just continued and continued until I got back to city where I had to slow down. Ended up with 1,5 hours 0,95 IF. I actually felt great after that but the next day I could really feel it in my legs.
__________________
"It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 80
|
As long as the weather permits I am planning to continue "overlong" L4/SST outdoors where I do not need any extra motivation, but sooner or later probably sooner the trainer season is in front and here's my variation of over-under/hour-of-power theme: start riding steady 0.9 IF. Every full 5 minutes hit hard 1.15-1.2 IF for 30 secs. Return to 0.9. Every starting 3 minutes after full 5 (so eg. 3, 8, 13, etc) raise the power a bit over FTP (say 1.05 IF) for 1 minute.
The key is not the exact minutes or power figures but regularity. There is no any physiologial reasoning for this but the idea is to kill time. With hard parts coming regularly after couple of rounds you change your thinking from "time is going sooo slowly" to "oh no time is going so fast" when you are begging for recovery. With this I can do longish intervals on trainer and also with very good average power.
__________________
"It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 80
|
+1 for the idea of over/under training. If you are training for racing, this simulates the efforts that you'll be putting forth. When I do such workouts, either indoors or out, I always try to get "over" as fast as possible. Without straining, I push my cadence and up my gear to really simulate a "break," or an attempt to bridge up. It's pretty fun, and keeps your workouts interesting. I usually don't do over/under workouts until I have a pretty good base, or about one month or more into a training cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 244
|
My off-season training has always been threshold-based. One of the keys to avoiding boredom is finding the correct power level. For me, this is around 90% of my last 20 minute test. I can ride an hour a this level day after day without feeling bored or over-reaching. Any more than this level and the perceived exertion becomes exponentially harder.
I do agree that mixing things up a bit also makes indoor training more tolerable. This can include over/under type workouts. What I do is get out of the saddle for a couple minutes every 15 minutes or so, raising the effort slightly. Over the last couple minutes of the workout I ramp my effort to about 10% above FTP but never high enough to feel totally wiped. IMHO, during winter "maintenance" the volume of meaningful work is more important than intensity. I would rather keep to a level that allows for a high volume of "sweet spot" training than risk burnout by attempting more intense workouts, as the reward from marginally increasing intensity does not justify the risk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 635
|
The stuff mentioned above is all good
Quote:
From what I have read, you can think of this as sort of threshold work - it has a similar cardiovascular and metabolic demand to a steady threshold interval but the neuromuscular demand is more appropriate for on/off racing. I would not use it preparing for a time trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
Please note I said that I set my one hour training level on about 90% of my last 20 minute test. I test every 3 weeks or so. Thus, the actual wattage is continually increasing, as is my FTP. I only used the word "maintenance" because I dislike the term "base." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
John do you do these 20m tests in your off season aswell to make sure your 20MP has not decreased or increased or is your off season not long enough to cause a fluctuation in 20MP? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
__________________
"It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
My "off-season" begins with getting reaclimated to the trainer, in my case a PT300. After three weeks or so, I perform my first 20 minute test and do so every three weeks or so until my threshold power plateaus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
|
Quote:
I have no intention to be pedantic here but "maintenance" and "base" training are two totally different training regimens. "Base" is an appropriate term in that it is synonomous with establishing a foundation, which is exactly what it is meant to do. The foundation for which higher intensity exercise can supported upon. Maintenance is doing just enough work to sustain the gains in fitness already achieved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
I'm not Steve_B and I'll jump in here anyway. This is an example of where Quadrant Analysis comes in handy. If one were to look at a QA of a variable power paced TT and a crit, you would see 2 markedly different images. This is because the "variable" TT is not nearly as "variable" as a crit (which is what Steve_B's intervals are mimicking. Dave |
|
|
|
|