![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 77
|
I am working through the hundreds of pages of "It's killing me but...". I was hoping to get a recommendation on getting my FTP to 300 watts. I am using my Kurt Kinetic. As hard as it is to ride in my garage, I am excited to break the 300 watt barrier. To start the indoor season, I did a 20 minute test. I averaged 21.4 mph which corresponds to 300.09 watts. I took that x .95 to get my ftp of 285.09 which corresponds to just over 20.9mph. I have been doing 3-4 sessions of 2x20s at 90-95% of ftp and will test monthly. I take 2 rest days and try to mix in a long easy ride as well. I usually ride 5-7 hrs weekly. Last winter I mixed in 5x5s once a week.
My goal is to get my 20 minute power to 315.1 watts, a 5% increase by March. What do you think? I appreciate your training recommendations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
it's probably what you DON'T want to hear right now but I'd strongly recommend getting a PT, SRM or other true power-meter and not relying on the KK curves. IMHO, you'll be happier in the long run. With the advent of wireless units last year, you can get quite reasonable deals on <gasp> ugly wired ones . Personally I've bought three PT Pro's over the years - all of 'em 2nd hand, all wired and all working fine for 3-4 yrs now.regards,
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Someday I just might get a power meter. Regardless of whether the kk curve is accurate or not, just reaching my goal is good enough for me. The improvement will be real even if the number is not. I'll keep an eye out for a cheap power meter in the meantime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Suggestion would be to pay attention to your level of preceived exertion on those 90-95% intervals, as they could be too hard for 3-4 sessions every week. If you've got a long and fairly steep local hill available, you might want to test your time on that before the winter gets too cold. Then in the spring you can test again, and calculate your % improvement in time (and power). If you can climb 5% faster, you'll have real-world confirmation that you gained 5% power over the winter.....as long as you didn't also gain 5% in weight ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Draper, Utah
Posts: 515
|
Quote:
__________________
blog Last edited by Piotr : 08-10.-2008 at 08:45 AM. Reason: made a booboo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
I ride my PT Pro on my Kurt Kinetic. One of my rides is done at ~21.1mph (34.0km/h) or slightly higher (try to not drop below 34km/h) and I am only at ~232-254watts...This is a 39x13@90rpm Are my watts reading low or are all of yours high?
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
FWIW 53x17@90rpm has me at ~21.9mph and requires about 255-270 watts on my KK using my PT Pro.
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
Why is this? Why don't his numbers correlate with mine? Can we get some more examples...
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,677
|
Quote:
Have you checked your your PT settings lately? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
My numbers match up almost too perfectly with Sheldon Browns gear calculator (The number given was in my small range of speed during the efforts): Gear chart using MPH @ 90 RPM For 700 X 23 / 23-622 tire with 172.5 mm cranks With Custom Sizes Cassette 53 / 17 21.9 Looking at actual ride data from a 20min Cycling Peaks ride: taking a random 5min in 53x17: Power Min 242 Max 289 Avg 264 Cadence Min 89 Max 91 Avg 90 Speed Min 35 Max 35.9 Avg 35.5 (convert to MPH is 22.01 avg) Sheldons calculator says 21.9..pretty close. FWIW Here is 39x12 which finally gets me over 300watts: Watts Min 283 Max 329 Avg 305 Cadence Min 89 Max 93 Avg 91 Speed Min 36.8 Max 38 Avg 37.3 or only 23.1 avg Sheldon's calc has 39x12 at 22.9 @ 90, I had 23.1 at ~91..close again.
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson Last edited by Meek One : 09-10.-2008 at 01:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
here I think the default wheel diameter listed by ACC.com is a bit large. i need to drop it to 0.666m from the 0.674 default to get the speeds to match up to my spreadsheet. I use 700x23c tires Gatorskins or Michelin PR2's and a rollout of 2093mm is always pretty darned consistent for 'known' long courses here. The math ain't that hard but this is but one example of why a PM that you can verify offline is a great tool. Check it perhaps twice a year and you're good to go.
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
Does my wattage look right? The OPs seemed very high for 21mph on the KK
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,677
|
Assuming you have a KK Road Machine (fluid) trainer and are not experiencing tire slip, your power readings are significantly below what the power curve for that trainer would predict.
OTOH, if you have a KK Cyclone (wind) trainer, then they might be fairly close. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
I have the KK Roadmachine Fluid Trainer. So this could mean the following, right: 1. either my speed is correct and my FTP is considerable higher Or 2. my watts are correct and my speed is considerable slower Or 3. everything is messed up somehow Hoping for #1 Suggestions on how to solve this... You know what, I actually bought the KK power computer, but never used it. If I can find it I can run them simultaneously and see what's going on... I'll be back... ![]()
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson Last edited by Meek One : 09-10.-2008 at 04:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
wow I hadn't looked at those charts before. Someone at KK should read up on "significant digits". Talk about implying a false sense of precision!! I would *not* want to be basing my woefully slow (at this time) training progress on a chart as sketchy as that. At a preferred cadence of say 90rpm - what does a single gear jump from 53x17 to say 53x16 yield? Anyhow, I have no axe to grind but will suggest again to the OP: get a real PM or maybe a CT, Velodyne or other well-regarded indoor trainer with power feedback ...
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|