![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Hampshire - US
Posts: 43
|
There seem to be many schools of thought concerning HR training zones. There are calculations based on % of max HR, or % of lactate threshold, and some based on a combination of max HR, and HR reserve. There are so many, I don't have a clue which to follow / rely on. I'd be very interested in the models people are using.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,265
|
I use the BC 6 Zones of training.
You'll find some info on the coaching section of www.britishcycling.org.uk But this will help you calculate them... http://www.abcc.freeserve.co.uk/hrcalc.html
__________________
www.cyclingforums.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 863
|
Quote:
hello 2LAP, is zone 1&2 that important once your an established rider, suppose you can do 4 hours in zones 3&4 with no problem. when i ride to many easy days it makes my hard days harder, it could be mental because i dont feel the low intensity has much benifit. (no cycling is called for in the 80-84% range.this is considered"no mans land"- to high for steady tempo of zone 3 and not hard enough to stimulate the improvement of zone 4) this is from a training book i read zone 1 recovery zone 2 66-72% basic endurance zone 3 73-79%higher-level aerobic capacity zone 4 85-90% anaerobic thres for tt & improved threshold zone 5 91-100%sprints and anaerobic power just like the 1st post there are so many differant do this & that as lances book says differant also. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, U.S.A.
Posts: 767
|
This web site has your basic 'plug & play' calculations with explanations for the various levels of intensity (zones)...
http://www.xsystems.co.uk/machinehe...r_abcc_bcf.html
__________________
"Know your limits... Then FK'N Crush'em!!!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange, California
Posts: 331
|
Nick-NH:
The best model to use is training percentages off your true maximum heart rate. You can screw around with HRR and other methods, but these values are more problematic/less accurate in my experience. You can use many different zones as well, but I find most of them to be more "work" than actual benefit. 5-6 zones to me is too much micro-managing of heart rate. I like easy, medium, and hard. Easy means recovery rides, easy rides, etc. Basically, low power efforts, with pr's not exceeding 70-75% of MHR or so. Medium means tempo rides, LT rides, TT efforts. Pr's should be around 82-92% of MHR. Hard means short, hard efforts like 3-5 minute intervals or shorter, with pr's around 92-100%. Sprints are sprints. Heart rate monitoring is not necessary. Life's full of complications. Keep your training simple. There's so much overlap of intensities, I find 3 zones to be plenty. The correct mix in relation to your training program is what's important. Happy monitoring!!!
__________________
Send comments, praise, or flames to: jm_560@Hotmail.com Last edited by J-MAT : 28-10.-2003 at 01:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Hampshire - US
Posts: 43
|
Thanks to everyone for the feedback! I think keeping it simple is the rule!
|
|
|
|