Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


truvativ or shimano...I NEED HELP ERE

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-11.-2003, 04:35 PM   #1
-m A s s-
Junior Member
 
-m A s s-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: malaysia
Posts: 10
Send a message via ICQ to -m A s s-
Default truvativ or shimano...I NEED HELP ERE

im upgrading my crank...the onli problem is that alot a ppl are buzzing in my ear bout the shimano xt...but ppl tell me 2 get the truvativ stylo sl 03 model....can someone help me wif the pro`s and con`s if there are any?
__________________
Gravity-I fought the law, but the law won!!!
-m A s s- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11.-2003, 10:28 PM   #2
Hecubus
Senior Member
 
Hecubus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Default

Nothing shifts like shimano. Plus XT is cheaper...
Hecubus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11.-2003, 10:42 AM   #3
stevemtbsteve
Registered User
 
stevemtbsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Default

I run XT and it rules, most transmission comes from the big s, so it has to be smooth. But, my M8 has just got a new orange with the race face prodigy crank, no difference in weight and feels stiffer than my XT and no difference in price and looks BOSS!. don't bother with the truvati, good cranks, but don't have the looks!
stevemtbsteve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11.-2003, 10:50 AM   #4
MtnBikerChk
Community Team
 
MtnBikerChk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 291
Send a message via AIM to MtnBikerChk
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by stevemtbsteve
I run XT and it rules, most transmission comes from the big s, so it has to be smooth. But, my M8 has just got a new orange with the race face prodigy crank, no difference in weight and feels stiffer than my XT and no difference in price and looks BOSS!. don't bother with the truvati, good cranks, but don't have the looks!


people either love shimano or hate it. it's definitely easy to install and maintain. I don't particularly like race face but I had a bad experience with some oem rings. but that's me. I say, go with what works for you!
MtnBikerChk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11.-2003, 11:42 AM   #5
Hecubus
Senior Member
 
Hecubus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Default

Race Face makes some sweet stuff. I used to own their LP cranks. The rings shift very well but they still can't touch shimano. Their prodigy stuff is garbage though. Its mainly designed as cheap oem parts. The prodigy cranks are not very durable and the rings are trash. Its ok for the price but its still not that great.
Hecubus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11.-2003, 11:44 AM   #6
stevemtbsteve
Registered User
 
stevemtbsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MtnBikerChk
people either love shimano or hate it. it's definitely easy to install and maintain. I don't particularly like race face but I had a bad experience with some oem rings. but that's me. I say, go with what works for you!


must admit I had heard a few bad things about the race face rings over the last few years, but friends bike keeps cranking out crisps shifts and he is on his second chain (sram to mix things up a bit more) and we ride some pretty muddy trails in the UK. But his is the only race face crank I have had experience of. I also have to say the recessed decals on the arms keep them looking sweet, I fitted my XT's 9 months ago and the they look pretty ****ed (but they work perfect). certainly looks are not the main reason to buy, but I'm a bit of ponce and like things that look pretty but that's me. but as you say " I say, go with what works for you!"
stevemtbsteve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11.-2003, 01:59 PM   #7
-m A s s-
Junior Member
 
-m A s s-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: malaysia
Posts: 10
Send a message via ICQ to -m A s s-
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hecubus
Nothing shifts like shimano. Plus XT is cheaper...


are you sure that the xt is cheaper in my country the truvativ is goin for 92.10usd while the xt is goin for 110.50usd.....thats a hell loada diff in my country!!!but i still dont get it...whats bad bout the truvativ?
__________________
Gravity-I fought the law, but the law won!!!
-m A s s- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-11.-2003, 04:18 AM   #8
MtnBikerChk
Community Team
 
MtnBikerChk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 291
Send a message via AIM to MtnBikerChk
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hecubus
Their prodigy stuff is garbage though. Its mainly designed as cheap oem parts. The prodigy cranks are not very durable and the rings are trash. Its ok for the price but its still not that great.


BINGO!
MtnBikerChk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-11.-2003, 11:13 PM   #9
frey
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: England
Posts: 51
Default

Truvativ make decent kit and are being used by loads of manufacturers on their bikes because of it. They're also good value, as you've found out. So no real downside to them.
The argument really is if the benefits of the XT one is worth the extra. Certainly for the money the XT is an awesome piece of kit, and will almost certainly shift better than anything else you can buy. It's also probably lighter (haven't checked the Truvativ but the XT is very very light for the money).

so up to you really, if you're hard up for cash the Truvativ will do the job admirably, if you're prepared to pay for a performance benefit and a little weight then the Shimano is better
__________________
... must be the damn bike!
frey is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet