Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Cassette Sizing?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-12.-2003, 10:33 AM   #1
gwhunt23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to gwhunt23
Default Cassette Sizing?

I am looking at buying a Shimano XT cassette for my '04 Trek 4300. I am doing the upgrade from 8 to 9 gears. So, I need to know what size to get. I know nothing about cassettes, so help would be greatly appreciated.

The sizes availabe are:

011/32
011/34
012/34

what do these numbers mean? wich will I need? I can provide more inforamtion if neccessary.

Thanks in advance!
gwhunt23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12.-2003, 04:11 PM   #2
cachehiker
Registered User
 
cachehiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 121
Default Re: Cassette Sizing?

Quote:
Originally posted by gwhunt23
I am looking at buying a Shimano XT cassette for my '04 Trek 4300. I am doing the upgrade from 8 to 9 gears. So, I need to know what size to get. I know nothing about cassettes, so help would be greatly appreciated.

The sizes availabe are:

011/32
011/34
012/34

what do these numbers mean? wich will I need? I can provide more inforamtion if neccessary.

Thanks in advance!


I hope your upgrading components now, buying a better frame/fork next winter, and then transferring them to the new frame and putting the old components back on the 4300 frame. It really doesn't justify a full XT setup.

The first number is the smallest cog and the second is the largest. I tend to spin and rarely push big gears for long so I use a 12-34. If you tend to pedal at a slower cadence, a 11-32 might work better for you.

I believe the cog sequence goes:
11-32: 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32
11-34: 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
12-34: 12-13-15-17-20-23-26-30-34
__________________
Bri
1,000,000 bicycles = 2 megacycles
cachehiker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12.-2003, 10:59 PM   #3
Hecubus
Senior Member
 
Hecubus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Default

The 11-32 has overall smaller faster gears. If you want an easy cassette get the 11-34 or 12-34 which have a larger 34 cog for hard climbs. Decide whether you want the faster 11 cog at first or if you want a smaller jump between the first two small congs with the 12-34.
Hecubus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2003, 12:17 AM   #4
rek
Registered User
 
rek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,200
Send a message via ICQ to rek Send a message via MSN to rek
Default

On a somewhat related note, you'll save a lot of money by going with a lower spec 9-speed cassette. You really don't lose much at all, except for a few grams of extra weight.

I run an LX-spec chain and cassette on my otherwise XT/XTR bike.. I see little value in dropping serious extra cash on consumables like chains and cassettes.
__________________
Peter
Cannondale Synapse Carbon Scalpel Cyclocross Ultra
rek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2003, 02:07 AM   #5
Hecubus
Senior Member
 
Hecubus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by rek
On a somewhat related note, you'll save a lot of money by going with a lower spec 9-speed cassette. You really don't lose much at all, except for a few grams of extra weight.

I run an LX-spec chain and cassette on my otherwise XT/XTR bike.. I see little value in dropping serious extra cash on consumables like chains and cassettes.


I would say its the opposite. LX is not worth the cost. At least here the difference in price between XT and LX is so minimal its not worth considering LX unless your budget is seriously tight.
The difference in cost between an XTR chain and LX level chain is about 2 dollars so its not even worth considering anything less than the XTR chain. An XT cassette is $38 while and LX is about $30. There is not such a large drop in weight between XT and XTR when compared to the price difference but there is when comparing an LX cassette to an XT one. The XT uses an aluminum cog carrier which cuts weight considerably. LX doesn't use a carrier. They both have the same steel rings so they will wear down about equally as fast.
Hecubus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2003, 08:25 AM   #6
gwhunt23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 27
Send a message via AIM to gwhunt23
Default

Thanks for your help! I think I will go with the 11-34, as I will need the large 34 cog for climbing hills, and will be ok with the larger jump between the 2 smallest cogs.

Thanks again!
gwhunt23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2003, 01:36 PM   #7
rek
Registered User
 
rek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,200
Send a message via ICQ to rek Send a message via MSN to rek
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hecubus
I would say its the opposite. LX is not worth the cost. At least here the difference in price between XT and LX is so minimal its not worth considering LX unless your budget is seriously tight.
The difference in cost between an XTR chain and LX level chain is about 2 dollars so its not even worth considering anything less than the XTR chain. An XT cassette is $38 while and LX is about $30.

I wish I lived where you are; here, XT cassettes are about 40-50% more expensive than LX, and you just don't want to know how much the XTR stuff is (chains or cassette)...
__________________
Peter
Cannondale Synapse Carbon Scalpel Cyclocross Ultra
rek is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet