Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
26-12.-2003, 03:38 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 33
|
Cranks : Bontrager vs Shimano
I was seriously considering giving myself the Trek 8500 as xmas present (any excuse will do, but it's in the season spirit).
I noted, on the prod. image on Trek, it shows Shimano XT cranks, while it's spec'ed with a Bontrager. Of obvious differences, is about 100grams of weight, in advantage of the Bontrager. What is the other major differences, which could have made Trek make the switch ? Which of the two, would be the better choice ? The parts in question is : - Bontrager Race 44/32/22 w/ISIS - Shimano FC-M760 / LJ http://www.ljweb.com |
|
|
|
26-12.-2003, 05:59 AM
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
|
I would go to Shimano. I have experience with XTR Hollowtech II and it is the best I have ever had. I suppose XT is the same stuff maybe a bit havier. XTR is extremely stiff.
|
|
|
|
|
27-12.-2003, 09:36 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 36
|
I use XTR love it. It's a must have for any good mountain biker.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
