![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 78
|
If you don't add the weight of the bike to your weight when entering that value - what is the end result? Are watts under reported or over reported? My sense is that time and speed will remain the same but watts will be under reported if you just report/enter your body weight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 78
|
do you mean your speed would be higher and time lower if you DON"T add the weight of the bike?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 24
|
The CT applies a load to the power generator that is determined based on an algorithm that takes into account wind resistance, grade/slope of terain and weight. If you keep all other variables the same but input a lower weight the load generator will apply less drag on your rear wheel and at the same time will indicate the appropriate lower wattage. This makes sense because a lighter rider needs less wattage output to maintain the same speed uphill as a heavier rider. What this also means is that a lower weight input will allow the CT user to go up a hill faster than he could if he input the correct (ie. heavier) weight than the lower weight because the CT is putting less drag on the load generator because it thinks the rider/bike weight is lighter than it really is. (Lighter riders need less power to climb hills.)
Art |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 88
|
Sorry Rick, but you're incorrect. If you want to test the theory, do a ride with the weight not including the bike weight. Save that ride as a performance file. Then do the same ride, this time with the bike weight added to your body weight. Use the performance file as your pacer. The pacer will SMOKE you! Each pound of weight requires about 3 additional watts of power to accomplish the same result. So, if your bike weighs 18 lbs., you would have to pump out an additional 54 watts just to keep up with your "18 lb. lighterself" pacer...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
I was in touch with Computrainer and asked them teh question and what they said was that the default value was for a 160 pound rider. so ... if you weight 140 pounds and unless you are into a lot of pain there is no sense in adding bike weight - the default value ahs you there already. I used the Analytic Bicycling site to calculate speed under a given power (watts) and rider+bike weight and the amount of effect that rider weight has on speed under a set wattage isn't as great as you think. |
|
|
|
|