Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Computrainer Question

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-01.-2004, 02:57 PM   #1
sub55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 78
Default Computrainer Question

If you don't add the weight of the bike to your weight when entering that value - what is the end result? Are watts under reported or over reported? My sense is that time and speed will remain the same but watts will be under reported if you just report/enter your body weight.
sub55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-01.-2004, 10:01 AM   #3
sub55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 78
Default

do you mean your speed would be higher and time lower if you DON"T add the weight of the bike?
sub55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-01.-2004, 11:23 PM   #5
ART
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 24
Default

The CT applies a load to the power generator that is determined based on an algorithm that takes into account wind resistance, grade/slope of terain and weight. If you keep all other variables the same but input a lower weight the load generator will apply less drag on your rear wheel and at the same time will indicate the appropriate lower wattage. This makes sense because a lighter rider needs less wattage output to maintain the same speed uphill as a heavier rider. What this also means is that a lower weight input will allow the CT user to go up a hill faster than he could if he input the correct (ie. heavier) weight than the lower weight because the CT is putting less drag on the load generator because it thinks the rider/bike weight is lighter than it really is. (Lighter riders need less power to climb hills.)

Art
ART is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01.-2004, 10:12 AM   #6
larrynipon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 88
Default Re: Re: Computrainer Question

Sorry Rick, but you're incorrect. If you want to test the theory, do a ride with the weight not including the bike weight. Save that ride as a performance file. Then do the same ride, this time with the bike weight added to your body weight. Use the performance file as your pacer. The pacer will SMOKE you! Each pound of weight requires about 3 additional watts of power to accomplish the same result. So, if your bike weighs 18 lbs., you would have to pump out an additional 54 watts just to keep up with your "18 lb. lighterself" pacer...
Quote:
Originally posted by rmur
Hi there. I'm not an expert but, based on my use of the CT for the past year, I believe you will find Watts to be correctly reported but your speed will be higher and time lower than one would expect when adding bike weight.

I add 20 lbs or 9kg all the time and slog up the hills as a result!

Regards,
Rick
larrynipon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-01.-2004, 12:28 PM   #7
sub55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 78
Default Re: Re: Re: Computrainer Question

Quote:
Originally posted by larrynipon
Sorry Rick, but you're incorrect. If you want to test the theory, do a ride with the weight not including the bike weight. Save that ride as a performance file. Then do the same ride, this time with the bike weight added to your body weight. Use the performance file as your pacer. The pacer will SMOKE you! Each pound of weight requires about 3 additional watts of power to accomplish the same result. So, if your bike weighs 18 lbs., you would have to pump out an additional 54 watts just to keep up with your "18 lb. lighterself" pacer...


I was in touch with Computrainer and asked them teh question and what they said was that the default value was for a 160 pound rider. so ... if you weight 140 pounds and unless you are into a lot of pain there is no sense in adding bike weight - the default value ahs you there already.

I used the Analytic Bicycling site to calculate speed under a given power (watts) and rider+bike weight and the amount of effect that rider weight has on speed under a set wattage isn't as great as you think.
sub55 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet