![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 97
|
Gals,
My wife is going to start riding, and I need some help. What size bike? She's 5'2" with a 28" inseam. Anyone close to this and what do you ride? I'm looking at a TON of different bikes, but haven't gotten her on any yet. Probably start shopping tonight. Gonna look at Giant/Cannondale/Fuji/Specialized/etc. Just curious if anyone is about her size and what you ride. I'll have to measure everything and use a chart, but wanted to get started and straightened out in my head. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: virginia, usa
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
Not sure what my inseam is. I ride Specialized Allez Elite Cro-Mo (50)--standover height is just above 28 inches. I'm 5'3" with very very short legs, and when I stand over this bike, I'm not intimate, but I'm touching the top bar. This bike has 700c wheels. You may have luck if you look into 650c wheels. The only major problem: to fit, the seatpost is down almost as far as it can go, making it hard to get aerodynamic on this bike. I found that the Trek 5200 WSD (47) was a sweet fitting bike, but it's almost 3 times as expensive too. But I was told that several less expensive Trek models for women had similar geometries. I didn't try them because I was looking for steel. Good luck and happy shopping! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 42
|
Brightgarden....
I'm curious as to why you were looking for a steel frame? ccorrick..... Have you checked out the Terry bikes? They are a female designed bike.... for females.... Some good female specific tips on this site.... http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/terry/index.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 48
|
I'm 5'2", not sure of my exact inseam. I just bought a Cannondale R500 FEM, size 47. Both wheels are 650, our LBS was pretty adament about keeping wheel sizes the same.
The other one I was going to look at was a Jamis Ventura. Their XS is the equivelent of a 47. Unfortunately they didn't have one in stock. Not sure if both wheels are 650, the front one is anyway. I went with the Cannondale so we didn't investigate further, have heard it both ways. It could be something they changed this year (both wheels being 650). Keep in mind this is my first real road bike and due to the nasty road conditions right now, my only miles have been on the trainer at the LBS. It won't fit on our old trainer so I am waiting for new stock to come in (don't you hate when it costs more than you had hoped? LOL) They did change the stem for me, they really spent a lot of time fitting me to the bike. Told me to come back for a refitting when I put clipless pedals on. I'm tempted to ask what they'll charge to fit me to my mtn bike, the shop I got that for pretty much said "yeah, this will fit you" and handing it over to me. Good luck and have fun. My goal is to beat my DH. ![]() Diane |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 97
|
Thanks for the replies so far.
Diane, I'm looking at an '03 FEM (they were an R400 last year). My LBS happens to be in another state and because they used to sponser me, I support them all I can. Anyway, it has the 650s and they will let her try all the saddles in stock to find a fit. That one is $650, a bit more than I wanted to spend, but if I can't find a good used bike I may do it. Seems to be about right everywhere as far as measurments. Of course all this is from measurement and not actual tests. I'm going to take her to a shop tonight and just see what will work. Thanks again everyone. This is helping and broadens my search a lot. I think i'm more excited than her!!![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: virginia, usa
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
Originally: because aluminum has a bad rap. doesn't last long, gets stress fractures, etc. my friends on aluminum bikes older than 10 years seem to hate em. same friends regret getting rid of their steel tanks. (I still have mine). Finally: because I discovered that Specialized makes a compact frame in steel! But until I found that out, I was just minutes away from purchasing an entry-level aluminum road bike just to get on one. plus some of my other friends were getting on my case for being a steel snob without any good reason. So, here's all I can say: I would (yes!) get a carbon bike if I could afford it. I would indeed test ride a titanium bike, and I would gladly accept one as a gift or a prize, hard-won, in a contest. I would also potentially purchase a very good fitting aluminum racing bike (for the strict purpose of racing), but chances of such a bike existing seem slim. But my savings are going toward a custom steel frame bike that fits me. My bike feels good, and is a good enough fit for me to have fun on it. But I can't get aerodynamic on it, and that bums me out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 97
|
Hmm..I'm a alum addict!! Glad my wife knows no better, cause she's gonna get an alum too! hahaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: virginia, usa
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
better watch out! she may outstrip even YOUR enthusiasm for biking! and I'm not really down on aluminum... some of my best friends' bikes are aluminum... ...and they beat my pants off... [and i confess, i bought my daughter an aluminum bike (she doesn't know better either)] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 48
|
It's funny, because I know no different either. Mine is alum, and the 04 Ventura is as well. DH has an 03 Ventura - steel. Hey, I'll take anything in my favor.
![]() But yeah, I'm a little worried about how much I'll get beat up. We do road racing (cars) and have stiff suspensions that never bother me, but with partial bodyweight resting on my wrists I may feel differently. Personally I can't even deal with mushy car rides, I get nauseous! Guess there is only one way to find out how I like the bike! ![]() Diane |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I think for the average enthusiastic amateur rider, aluminum's lack of durability is highly exaggerated. I don't know that I'd recommend aluminum if you're planning to ride the same bike for over a decade but most cyclist will find they want a new bike before a decade passes by. I have 5 bikes and they all have aluminum frames. The one with the most wear and tear is my hard-tail mountain bike. It has 5-years of 4-7 rides per week on a trail that is anything but kind to the equipment. Surely someday the frame will give but I've read suggestions of replacing aluminum frames every year or every two years. This sounds like a great sales gimmick. My oldest aluminum roadbike is about 12 years old and still offers as good a ride as it ever did. The equipment is a bit outdated, (i.e. downtube shifters, 6-speed cogset, etc.). I don't have access to x-ray equipment but I have no doubts concerning the frame's integrity. That metal fork doesn't quite instill the confidence of the carbon fiber on either my 2001 or 2003 aluminum frame road bikes, though. Aluminum can take quite a pounding over a reasonably long period. I think the more important question is how much of a pounding can you take since aluminum likes to share every bump in the road with the rider. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
OOh I'm jealous..shopping for a bike!! I'm 5'3" and long legs for my height. I ride a Litespeed Tuscany and its a 49. http://www.litespeed.com/bikes/tuscany.aspx# fits me nice. my inseam was 29 and i was in between a size of frame. 49 or 50. no half sizes. SO I went smaller. in case you dont know this::: measuring is important! Tell your honey to take her shoes off and hold a stick under her crotch area. .... a yardstick or something would work...and hold it LEVEL horizontally up at the crotch with the same pressure she would feel if she were sitting on a seat. ~ yeah its kinky..haha!~ Then measure from the floor to that stick. its gets you an accurate inseam for determining the frame size. Dont go by the pants inseam. I wouldnt trust that accuracy and you need to know where the seat is sitting I would definitely recommend to you, if you havent already, to look at the Bianchi frame or the Serrota for a woman. They are really nicely set up for a woman's body without even being woman specific. classic, tight metal frame. They are all different prices. Shop around too and just because it sounds expensive.....You might get lucky and find one in her size on sale. check out this website.:: http://www.hi-techbikes.com/ But you should still definitely get her to make her final decision with a test ride! GOod luck and happy riding!!!!!! I am so excited for you guys! Its like getting a puppy or something. only without the mess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
Just curious.... Why do you keep buying aluminum?? ''Ride it hard and put it up wet baby ''steel needs a bit more TLC sometimes, right? yeah I think it still comes down to the test ride. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
why?? I am so curious! does it just feel like you are scrunched? I swear I have that problem. I feel like my knees are in my chest. it could be the ...chest factor?? ... just kidding (hahaha I wish I had that problem!) but seriously explain what you mean. Maybe someone can give you advice on how to help that. I got one of those cycle videos of Virginia in the fall. <sigh> very pretty. wow. you are so lucky. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
very nice. here is a site to look at her bike that she can't go aero on. >poke< http://norcalcycling.com/stores/fea...elite_cro.shtml |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Aluminum's reputation for a harsh ride is the result of the stiffness of the material. This may feed more of the bumps and jolts to the rider but it also provides a better feel to the rider for what is going on at the interface between tire and road. In addition, a rigid frame transmits more of the rider's power to the rear wheel and handles with precision when it comes time to flick the bike in and out of turns at high speed. Much like the stiff suspension of a sports car/race-bred automobile, aluminum is a trade off. Harsher ride, better feel and handling. Of course if the asphalt gets rough, then the lack of compliancy in the frame material does the opposite. Everything in design is a compromise. As you mentioned, steel is less resistant to the environment - namely, rust. It's not a huge problem unless the bike lives outdoors and you live in a moist area but when you consider that the wall thickness of chromoly tubing can be as thin as .3mm, it doesn't take much rust to create a weak spot. ![]() |
|
|
|
|