| uk.rec.cycling archive This forum is a gateway to the uk.rec.cycling usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by gildas.failler@ Reply to Dave Kahn. I have not tried the transformation of energy of shocks into energy of propulsion, it works only on the paper so far. It could not be perpetual motion, but I suppose 9/10 of the energy could be recovered. But I'm using my prototype everyday and yes, obviously, the use of the whole muscle apparatus for propulsion gives more power. Some other people have tried and concurred. Concerning the 10$, it covers the costs, but not yet one demand! It took 30 years for the present back-wheel propulsion to beat the previous front-wheel propulsion, it might take all that much for my system. It's just the fate of some inventors. Thanks anyway for your comments, which help me understand why no bike-maker takes this seriously. |
| Bookmarks |
« London 2 Brighton
|
Helmets »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com










Linear Mode

















