| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
C L Imber wrote: > And if their question has not been answered every week for > the last five years? The Welcome doesn't say /don't/ post immediately, it says it's a good idea to review things for a couple of weeks before joining in. And it often /is/. It also says to post a question when you want to know an answer, so if that's immediately then you can do that and not step outside the bounds of what's in the Welcome. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
"Paul Saunders" <pvs1@wildwales.fsnet.co.uk> schreef in bericht news:ccafj6$7a4$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk... > And that's not the only example, it happens repeatedly. > Makes you wonder if their newsreader has even downloaded > the list of previous threads. My list begins with 28/06. Perhaps that is because of the many reactions on the original messages. A Dutch walking newsgroup (nl.wandel) begins with 6/04 but there aren't as many replies as in urw. Googling comes in handy but somethimes there is so much info that it's much more efficient to put your question in a newsgroup. Theo |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:18:47 +0100, Tim Jackson <news@winterbourne.freeserve.invalid> wrote: >C L Imber wrote on Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:40:13 +0100.... >> [...] given that the proportion of new entrants to Usenet >> is so much lower? > >Is it? Why? Who collects the statistics? Yes. I don't know why. Google. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
theo wrote: > My list begins with 28/06. Perhaps that is because of the > many reactions on the original messages. A Dutch walking > newsgroup (nl.wandel) begins with 6/04 but there aren't as > many replies as in urw. I've got messages going back to 01/05. Freeserve usually keeps them for a whole month but that seems to be increasing lately. > Googling comes in handy but somethimes there is so much > info that it's much more efficient to put your question in > a newsgroup. Yeah, but it's a bit irritating when the question was answered two days before. Paul -- http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=118749 |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
In 9jpge01gfvtmr29ta42o92i7udaav8hoc8@4ax.com C L Imber mused: > On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:18:47 +0100, Tim Jackson > <news@winterbourne.freeserve.invalid> wrote: > >> C L Imber wrote on Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:40:13 +0100.... >>> [...] given that the proportion of new entrants to >>> Usenet is so much lower? >> >> Is it? Why? Who collects the statistics? > > Yes. I don't know why. Commenting on things one doesn't know/understand? Usenet really is going downhill. (implied smiley abundance) > Google. Google has ideas above its station, and is an imperfect reflection. |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| faq, monthly, posting, ukrecwalking |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com










Linear Mode

















