| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#76
| |||
| |||
Pat Bennet wrote: >> I used a Fred Miranda action for resizing my files, and it was good enough for Alamy. See >> http://www.fredmiranda.com/software/ Did you tell them what you used or did they ask? >> I have saved a noise profile for my D30 at ISO speeds from 100 to 1600, and simply apply the >> appropriate one to each image in the queue. I'm very pleased with the results. ste © wrote: > How do you create your noise profile Pat? When I was doing a profile, I just selected an area of > the sky in my image that was plain blue in colour (ie, just one colour). Should I using a specific > type of image to create these noise profiles, and what did you use to create them? I tend to only > use ISO50, but I'm curious to see if I'm doing this correctly. To Pat I took a bunch of "noise" shots just before I sold my G3, and I wondered what the best thing to photograph was. I wanted a plain white sky, but knowing my luck the sun came out so I had to make do with a blue sky. Any idea if this makes much difference? Considering that noise is supposed to increase at longer shutter speeds, I took shots at many different shutter speeds. Does this make much difference in your opinion? What Neat Image settings are you using? Full noise reduction or what? Paul -- Calendars for 2004 http://www.wildwales.fsnet.co.uk/cal/cal.html http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=118749 |
|
#77
| |||
| |||
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:29:32 -0000, Paul Saunders <pvs1@wildwales.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > Pat Bennett wrote: > >>> I used a Fred Miranda action for resizing my files, and it was good enough for Alamy. See >>> http://www.fredmiranda.com/software/ > > Did you tell them what you used or did they ask? No, I didn't - they do not specify that CF *must* be used, only something like "similar professional software". Being as I had to pay for it, I call the FM action "professional software"! Also, my D30 only produces 9MB 8-bit files, instead of the 14MB that they specify, so I sent off the test CD to see what happened, and they accepted it. > >>> I have saved a noise profile for my D30 at ISO speeds from 100 to 1600, and simply apply the >>> appropriate one to each image in the queue. I'm very pleased with the results. > > ste © wrote: > >> How do you create your noise profile Pat? When I was doing a profile, I just selected an area of >> the sky in my image that was plain blue in colour (ie, just one colour). Should I using a >> specific type of image to create these noise profiles, and what did you use to create them? I >> tend to only use ISO50, but I'm curious to see if I'm doing this correctly. > > To Pat > > I took a bunch of "noise" shots just before I sold my G3, and I wondered what the best thing to > photograph was. I wanted a plain white sky, but knowing my luck the sun came out so I had to make > do with a blue sky. Any idea if this makes much difference? I don't think so - the noise in the sky doesn't seem to vary much whether it is blue or a hazy white. > > Considering that noise is supposed to increase at longer shutter speeds, I took shots at many > different shutter speeds. Does this make much difference in your opinion? > > What Neat Image settings are you using? Full noise reduction or what? My workflow is as follows : (a) Download images from the camera using Breeze's Downloader. Delete obvious duff photos. (b) Use Breezebrowser to convert the RAW files into 16 bit tiffs in a TIFF folder inside the month's RAW folder. (c) Copy all the files into Neat Image's queue. (d) Go down the queue setting the appropriate noise profile based on the ISO setting for each picture. (e) Run the batch and go and do something else for a few hours. The noise reduction setting is therefore the default. This is what I do for everything, but if I have something special, then I would work out what the best noise reduction settings were for that image, maybe even re-doing the noise profile for that image. I haven't done many long exposure images for a while, so I have not looked at the effect of shutter speed on noise. I suspect that you would need another profile for each ISO if shutter speed is into seconds. Best wishes, Pat -- Pat Bennett www.cheshirewildlife.co.uk |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 4000, coolscan, impressions, nikon, scanner, super |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com










Linear Mode

















