Separate names with a comma.
Why? Nothing happened. Why assume that they are waiting to mug you?
and that gets to the nub of the cultural differences: for most of the rest of the world, gun would never even appear in the same sentence as cycling.
next prediction - more CSC riders will also be found to be positive.
I guess neither of us are in a position to 'know'. We only can read what was reported, not necessarily what was said.
yeah, funny how we all end up arguing around in circles isn't it:) I think we all like to introject aspects of our heroes into ourselves and so...
if you read his explanation, it's pretty clear why he said what he said, and why he then said something different. Are you suggesting that he was...
because he doesn't have a single fast twitch fibre in his body probably. It just isn't his physiology, al least not without the chemical help of...
yes.
give the guy a break will you. he's a bike rider, not a Mensa candidate or a groomed TV personality, he's a sports person. He was under a lot of...
good thing too. A bit ambitious doing the ITT and the Road Race. Michael rogers will be a more than adequate ITT replacement.
so he performed well above your expectations then :D
you just don't win because of your 'mentality'. That's the sort of advertising spin used by Nike et al and by sportspeople who use that 'little...
interesting reports in the german press about meetings between Frank Schleck with Bjarne Riis with the infamous Dr Fuentes....
so by your own definition that comment would make you a liberal! Isn't "cute little jabs and veiled insults" a cute little jab and a veiled insult...
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1827/
more guns=freedom? Come on!
I don't want to protect criminals. I want them in jail not armed to the teeth and having shootouts with 'law-abiding citizens' who are also armed...
so it's not an absolute human right to be armed then? Why exclude school children?
no, he should have his license removed for life and be forced to travel the roads on a bike.
good point, but lets extend it: why give anyone with deadly weapons the benefit of the doubt?
