Is the cycling community actually serious about recommending wax as a chain lube alternative when it can cost upwards of 5 times more than traditional lubricants and only provides marginally better performance in extremely dry conditions, or is this just a case of cyclists trying to justify their own expensive hobby by convincing others to follow suit and waste their money on overpriced products that offer little to no real-world benefits for the average rider.
Doesnt the fact that manufacturers are now releasing their own line of expensive waxes that claim to offer better performance than traditional lubricants, but in reality only offer a few percent increase in efficiency at the cost of a significantly higher price point, seem like a blatant cash grab to take advantage of unsuspecting cyclists who are looking for ways to squeeze out every last bit of speed from their bikes.
And whats with all the hype surrounding wax as a chain lube, when in reality its just a fancy way of saying expensive chain lube thats only worth it if youre a professional cyclist competing at the highest level? For the average rider, isnt traditional lubricant more than sufficient, especially when you consider the significant cost savings and the fact that its often easier to apply and maintain than wax.
Seriously, who actually uses wax on their chain and what benefits do they see that make it worth the significantly higher cost, and are there any actual studies or data that support the claims made by manufacturers about the benefits of wax over traditional lubricant, or is this just a case of cycling companies trying to sell us the latest and greatest in overhyped products.