$100 fines for cyclists in East Perth



S

suomynona

Guest
Hi,

Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
footbridge.

I am (twice daily) bemused why this single 50m section of probably the
safest, slowest, widest and highest visibility section of our 100's of
km's beautiful bike paths in Perth is such a focus for the local
council? There are many far more dangerous sections for both
pedestrians and cyclists that get significantly more traffic that are
not addressed by the same council, some just a few hundred metres away
(Narrows bridge underpass for one).

Anyway, the cycle police officers were really friendly and informative
about it all (thx guys) and are just doing there job, but from what I
could overhear the council would be doing this for the next few weeks.

Cheers,
suomynonA - who was lucky enough to avoid being fined:)
 

Marx SS

New Member
Jun 8, 2004
810
0
0
I can assume you are required to dismount & push your bike across the footbridge?

I understood that there may be similar moves along the Southbank/Crown promanard in Melbourne due to the increase in reported incidences.
 

SteveA

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
1,309
0
0
64
suomynona said:
Hi,

Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
footbridge.

I am (twice daily) bemused why this single 50m section of probably the
safest, slowest, widest and highest visibility section of our 100's of
km's beautiful bike paths in Perth is such a focus for the local
council? There are many far more dangerous sections for both
pedestrians and cyclists that get significantly more traffic that are
not addressed by the same council, some just a few hundred metres away
(Narrows bridge underpass for one).

Anyway, the cycle police officers were really friendly and informative
about it all (thx guys) and are just doing there job, but from what I
could overhear the council would be doing this for the next few weeks.

Cheers,
suomynonA - who was lucky enough to avoid being fined:)
You mean the planked suspension bridge with the 'cyclist dismount' signs and the 'traffic calming' devices?

I wonder if we can get the police and council rangers down to the nearby bike path along the river to have a chat to some of the more stupid peds who wander aimlessly across/along the shared path.

SteveA
 

SuzieB

New Member
Oct 15, 2005
282
0
0
Marx SS said:
I understood that there may be similar moves along the Southbank/Crown promanard in Melbourne due to the increase in reported incidences.
'

I have seen some cyclists riding along the promenade at a far clip even though there are people everywhere. No wonder there are incidents. I suspect if people rode through slowly we wouldn't need to police the area.
 
G

GPLama

Guest
"suomynona" wrote in message ...
> Hi,
>
> Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
> this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
> were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
> footbridge.
>


Kickass.. sounds like a sprint point.. Just have to make sure you have
enough kick to drop the coppers :)


cheers,
GPL
 
S

suomynona

Guest
SteveA:
> You mean the planked suspension bridge with the 'cyclist dismount'

signs and the 'traffic calming' devices?

Yep, thats the one. For those who don't know it, there are 5 (yep 5!)
cyclist calming devices within a 50 metre stretch, so it is impossible
to speed.

> stupid peds who wander aimlessly across/along the shared path.


Agreed. With spring/summer here, they are out in force again:( I
wonder what they think the large white dashed lines in the middle of
the path are for.

I Should also mention that I am incredibly grateful to the local/state
governments here for providing and maintaining the fantastic Perth
Bicycle Network we have, even if I don't always agree with their
application of safety measures:)

--
nonA -
 

byron27

New Member
Oct 19, 2003
919
2
0
48
suomynona said:
Hi,

Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
footbridge.

I am (twice daily) bemused why this single 50m section of probably the
safest, slowest, widest and highest visibility section of our 100's of
km's beautiful bike paths in Perth is such a focus for the local
council? There are many far more dangerous sections for both
pedestrians and cyclists that get significantly more traffic that are
not addressed by the same council, some just a few hundred metres away
(Narrows bridge underpass for one).

Anyway, the cycle police officers were really friendly and informative
about it all (thx guys) and are just doing there job, but from what I
could overhear the council would be doing this for the next few weeks.

Cheers,
suomynonA - who was lucky enough to avoid being fined:)
What was the fine actually for?

In my local rag (Vincent Voice) it stated that that while they discouraged people from riding across the bridge it wasnt illegal to do so.
 
G

gumby

Guest
I rode with my childs' year seven class last week. There are signs on
the East Perth/ClaiseBrook Bridge (north and south ends) that state
under PCC By-Law blah blah $100 thanks if you ride across the bridge.

Rich lawyers in East Perth enclave with contacts on council methinks
 

Jono L

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2005
4,434
124
48
GPLama said:
"suomynona" wrote in message ...
> Hi,
>
> Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
> this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
> were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
> footbridge.
>


Kickass.. sounds like a sprint point.. Just have to make sure you have
enough kick to drop the coppers :)


cheers,
GPL
Better watch out, I hear Russel C is becoming a policeman:D (yes in Perth.)

On topic: What a pathetic thing to do, catch some real criminals!!!!
 

cyclist2

New Member
May 9, 2004
233
0
0
suomynona said:
Hi,

Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
footbridge.

I am (twice daily) bemused why this single 50m section of probably the
safest, slowest, widest and highest visibility section of our 100's of
km's beautiful bike paths in Perth is such a focus for the local
council? There are many far more dangerous sections for both
pedestrians and cyclists that get significantly more traffic that are
not addressed by the same council, some just a few hundred metres away
(Narrows bridge underpass for one).

Anyway, the cycle police officers were really friendly and informative
about it all (thx guys) and are just doing there job, but from what I
could overhear the council would be doing this for the next few weeks.

Cheers,
suomynonA - who was lucky enough to avoid being fined:)
The bridge next to the entertainment centre is still open though the signs say it will be closed, a bit confusing.
 
P

Plodder

Guest
--
Frank
[email protected]
Drop DACKS to reply
"suomynona" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> SteveA:
> > You mean the planked suspension bridge with the 'cyclist dismount'

> signs and the 'traffic calming' devices?
>
> Yep, thats the one. For those who don't know it, there are 5 (yep 5!)
> cyclist calming devices within a 50 metre stretch, so it is impossible
> to speed.
>
> > stupid peds who wander aimlessly across/along the shared path.

>
> Agreed. With spring/summer here, they are out in force again:( I
> wonder what they think the large white dashed lines in the middle of
> the path are for.
>
> I Should also mention that I am incredibly grateful to the local/state
> governments here for providing and maintaining the fantastic Perth
> Bicycle Network we have, even if I don't always agree with their
> application of safety measures:)
>
> --
> nonA -


Yes, I'll agree that the Bike Path Network is coming on well. But I have
reservations:
(1) I cycled from Freo to work in Kwinana yesterday. I don't often ride from
Freo, I live in the Hills and usually cycle from Armadale or Success - my
commute is part drive, part cycle. Freo to work is about 15km along the
road. Yesterday I decided to take the bike path. Geez! Nearly 23km! It winds
about, being scenic, instead of providing a direct route. I've noted this
with several bike routes. Gosnells to Perth, for instance, wanders about
through parks and reserves. Very pretty but adds time and distance to a
commute.
There is a certain amount (not much) promotion for cycle commuting, but it
seems to me that many paths are built with the assumption that cycling is
really just a pastime, so we'll make it pretty rather than practical.
I must admit that riding along the coast road through Henderson industrial
area is scary enough to get me on the bike path. Plenty of 'traffic
enraging' islands and squeeze points, coupled with trucks and redneck
drivers of all sorts makes for some very close calls. I gave up 'claiming
the lane' after so many people simply ignored double white lines and
oncoming traffic to overtake me. I was concerned more that there would be a
head-on crash than for my safety.
I'd like to see a marked bike lane on roads like this for commuting on a
direct route, with the scenic route being used for recreational cycling.
(2) I've mentioned before how the bike paths treat us like second-class
commuters by giving priority to motorised traffic at road junctions. Why
would I use the bike path and have to stop/start when I can ride on the road
and maintain my rhythm? Unfortunately, what I hear a lot of is "Bloody
cyclists. We pay for nice bike paths and they don't use them. What are they
doing on the road?" I really want to get involved with design of paths as
well as attitude change that normalises bikes. That way we can get paths
where they are needed (alongside highways, for example, like the new Roe
Highway path - good one!) and save the infrastructure money spent on the
useless (except for recreation) paths that meander about. If anyone's got
any contacts in Perth that can help me get more involved, I'd appreciate the
tip.
I think it's high time cyclists were recognised as sometimes recreational,
sometimes commuting, sometimes personal transport, etc. We're not all always
'Sunday family picnic in the park' users.

I'll repeat my previous sentiment: Integrate, not segregate!

Cheers,

Frank
 
P

Plodder

Guest
--
Frank
[email protected]
Drop DACKS to reply
"suomynona" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Hi,
>
> Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
> this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
> were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
> footbridge.
>
> I am (twice daily) bemused why this single 50m section of probably the
> safest, slowest, widest and highest visibility section of our 100's of
> km's beautiful bike paths in Perth is such a focus for the local
> council? There are many far more dangerous sections for both
> pedestrians and cyclists that get significantly more traffic that are
> not addressed by the same council, some just a few hundred metres away
> (Narrows bridge underpass for one).
>
> Anyway, the cycle police officers were really friendly and informative
> about it all (thx guys) and are just doing there job, but from what I
> could overhear the council would be doing this for the next few weeks.
>
> Cheers,
> suomynonA - who was lucky enough to avoid being fined:)



Funny one, this. Last March the Touring Club held a ride and BBQ as part of
Bike Week. The ride started from South Perth and went over this bridge on
the way around. The chap leading the ride said that the signs had no legal
meaning, so we didn't have to dismount.

Has anyone checked on the legal standing of the signs before handing out
fines? Perhaps someone should contact the bloke at the Touring Club (no idea
who it was) and warn him he might be wrong. Anyone here a member of the
club? If not, I'll drop an email via their website.

Cheers,

Frank
>
 
T

Theo Bekkers

Guest
Jono L wrote:

> On topic: What a pathetic thing to do, catch some real criminals!!!!


By criminals do you mean people who are breaking the law? :)

Theo
 
G

Graeme Dods

Guest
On 28 Nov 2005 19:03:54 -0800, suomynona wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
> this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
> were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
> footbridge.


Where exactly is this footbridge? I thought it was the one which goes
to/from Claisebrook station, but I passed that on the way home last night
(I work about 30m from the end of it) and there was a sign saying "cyclists
must give way to pedestrians", or something similar, which to me means that
you can cycle.

Graeme
 

SteveA

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
1,309
0
0
64
Graeme Dods said:
On 28 Nov 2005 19:03:54 -0800, suomynona wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Well the signs have been up for a few months now, and finally it seems
> this morning the local council (armed with a couple of bike police)
> were issuing $100 fines for cyclists riding across the East Perth
> footbridge.


Where exactly is this footbridge? I thought it was the one which goes
to/from Claisebrook station, but I passed that on the way home last night
(I work about 30m from the end of it) and there was a sign saying "cyclists
must give way to pedestrians", or something similar, which to me means that
you can cycle.

Graeme

suspension bridge across Claisebrook Inlet, near Lamont's Restaurant. Has wooden surface. Can ride under it on both ends.

I work in Royal Street.

SteveA
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
0
Views
435
Road Cycling
Bestest Handsander
B