Like I said, you:
just have to go on and on and on until you think you can prove yourself right.
"Doesnotcompute" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Virgin wrote:
> > People like you (doesnotcompute)
>
> do you know me? therefore how can you group me with others?
>
> > just have to go on and on and on until you think you can prove yourself right.
>
> at which point previous to now have I gone "on and on" ?
>
> > How boring.
> >
> > The message said "100's of UK routes & trails".
> >
> > Whether they're links to 100's or even 1000's of routes & trails is insignificant. The fact is,
> > if you visit the site you have that amount
of
> > resource available for you,
>
> I have www access so I already had all that respurce available.
>
> > at no cost to yourself, for FREE.
>
> I agree - all of the sites you link to are free. So is your site. So what?
>
> > If you took the time to look you would see that there are some links to other sites containing
> > 100's of very specific routes.
>
> and?
>
> > It means that lazy argumentative users like yourself
>
> So you know me so well that you cll me lazy?
>
> > can find all these resources without having to do the legwork that other people have done for
> > you to find such information.
>
> Hardly "legwork" punching a few buttons is it?
>
> > It places it all in one convenient place.
>
> such as google perhaps?
>
> >
> > Something wrong with that?
>
> Nothing at all, except you spammed a non adverts newsgroup with details of a commercial website.
> You do get income (however small) from all those adverts right? Your top posted replies with
> failure to trim appropriately and lack of .sig sep show you are clearly either unfamiliar with
> usenet and it's netiquette or so care free you don't give a hoot.
>
> Oh well. I think the term is *plonk* - you might want to google that.
>
>
> --
> Dnc
