"Paul Kopit" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:58:36 GMT, "Matt O'Toole" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >I noticed Sheldon is making up some nice 13-30 and 13-34. If I wind up
buying a
> >bike with a double, he can count on me as a customer. A 13-34 gives about
the
> >same range as a stock triple setup. And with 9 gears, the gaps would be just fine.
>
> In my limited experience, getting a 110 bolt pattern double, 48/34 or
> 50/34, permits you to use standard cassettes and get low ranges. My preference is 48/34 and a
> 12/25 but a the 34/27 is a 39/31.
>
> With 10 speed readilly available, a triple for road riding becomes less of a necessity for most
> riders. I'm talking about the standard ranges 52/42/30 and 12/27.
You're absolutely right.
I guess it boils down to what's available to you and how much it costs. For me, slapping a 13-34
cassette on a standard modern double (39-53) would do the trick. However, depending on what
components you already have, a 34-48 crank could achieve the same thing.
I find I need (or prefer) about a 28-30" low gear. I'm not quite going to get it with a 34/27, but a
39/34 just about works. The high is less important, but I like 105-110".
Either way you'd probably need a new rear derailer, but it's still way cheaper than converting to a
triple. You'd probably need two new derailers, maybe a new BB. and with pre-2004 Shimano, a new STI
left shifter, in addition to the new crank.
I've been thinking a lot about this lately, because I'm shopping for a new (used) bike. Unless I get
lucky and find one with a triple, the question is how to get the gearing I need, and how much it's
going to cost me, above the cost of the bike itself.
Matt O.