So who won the 1996 TdF? And how do we think about cycling records now? Do we write them off? Do we leave them in place but put a huge asterisk by every name or on the title of the list?
Or are we dropping interest in this sport so the question matters about as much as some lost local language/dialect in some remote valley?
I'm reminded of the debate over home-run records in American baseball. Not just Bonds today, but McGwire, who legally took something (don't recall what, andrestinone, something like that) which was not against the rules (but should have been, baseball has not been strict on this stuff). It's not perfectly analogous, because EPO was against the rules, but in the sense that there were many athletes with access to PEDs, so in cycling the norm was use even if it was not allowed, it isn't clear who should be considered "best" at any point in time.
Or are we dropping interest in this sport so the question matters about as much as some lost local language/dialect in some remote valley?
I'm reminded of the debate over home-run records in American baseball. Not just Bonds today, but McGwire, who legally took something (don't recall what, andrestinone, something like that) which was not against the rules (but should have been, baseball has not been strict on this stuff). It's not perfectly analogous, because EPO was against the rules, but in the sense that there were many athletes with access to PEDs, so in cycling the norm was use even if it was not allowed, it isn't clear who should be considered "best" at any point in time.