Klaas Bil wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:46:07 -0600, john_childs wrote:
>
> >But a few Pro frames made with sexy welds and other sexy options
> might
> >be something to consider sometime in the future.
>
> And this coming from the man who owns a(n older) KH Pro frame and
> doesn't consider it worth the money in today's world?
Being worth the money is relative. For the younger folks asking why
the KH Pro was so expensive you just have to say the extra cost
wouldn't be worth it for them. The people who have the means and know
the difference would be more likely to understand.
I also bought my KH Pro back when the only quality choices for frames
were the Hunter and the KH. Everything good was expensive back then.
Now that there are more quality choices for 1/3 the cost it is harder
to justify the extra cost for what is now the KH Pro frame. Back then
it was very easy to justify the cost and I don't consider it a waste at
all (it has been very very good to me and I got in several good years
of riding in before things got cheaper and better).
There is a small market for boutique frames built with extra love and
style and electric sex welds even though they would cost more. Scott
Wallis and Dave Stockton need some special frames for some of the
special unicycles that they make.
--
john_childs
john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
Gallery:
http://gallery.unicyclist.com/john_childs
'Unicycling Bookmark List' (
http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) ::
'World Clock' (
http://tinyurl.com/a99y3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
john_childs's Profile:
http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
View this thread:
http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47162