"Ian G Batten" <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like a more rigid seatpost, as it appears to flex
> somewhat if the suspension is locked out. But 27.0mm
> seatposts are thin on the ground.
Perhaps not quite as common as 27.2, but certainly among the
most common sizes.
> Thompson's
Thomson's
> layback post, for example, starts at 27.2mm. Any thoughts?
If you really find flex a problem, bear in mind that the
materials used in most of the posts on the market have about
the same specific stiffness, are simple cylindrical plain-
gauge extrusions, and can only therefore be stiffer than
your OEM post if they're also heavier. Expensive posts using
stronger alloys generally do so in order to allow thinner
tube walls to be used, reducing weight, but also reducing
stiffness unless the weight is redistributed to the areas of
greatest stress. Thomson and Ritchey use an oval bore,
increasing fore-aft stiffness at a given weight. A Ritchey
Comp is quite cheap, as stiff as anything else you can buy,
has a little layback, and is widely available in the UK. The
KAlloy model, made in the same factory, is a little heavier,
cheaper, but just as stiff.
You might keep an eye on eBay for an old steel Shimano XT or
DX post - there's an unused one on eBay.de right now [item
3680550946]. It never hurts to ask if the seller will ship
to the UK.
Using a shimmed post would be a waste of money, as reducing
the diameter is a great way to reduce stiffness unless the
tube walls are also beefed up out of proportion.
Having said all that, I'm heavy, and my two hardtails both
use long 27.0mm posts (a light Syncros, and a Ritchey Comp).
I wonder how much your seatpost can really be flexing unless
your rear end is also taking more of a battering than is
good for it.
James Thomson