> BS. It _all_ had to do with sponsorship dollars.
> BS. It _all_ had to do with sponsorship dollars.
> Also keep in mind the sight of the US Postal team time trial in '01, blown apart literally by
> crosswinds that caught the big flat sides of their aerodynamic wheels. Sure, they would have
> helped if the wind was calm, but it wasn't anywhere near calm and they rode them anyway. What's to
> blame there, bad management or the insistance of sponsors?
And people call *me* cynical?
Whether your sponsor is Mavic or Rolf or Bontrager, they really don't give a rat's tail which of
their wheels you use in a given event, as long as you use their wheel. Postal (and every other TDF
team) has a number of special and general-purpose wheels at their disposal...most often by the same
manufacturer. The choice of which wheel to use for a given course, *especially* for a time trial, is
never the sponsor's. They sign a contract that says they'll professionally represent the product,
not that they'll use a aero wheel with "big flat sides" in every time trial.
Your bone to pick is with the team manager and perhaps some riders, maybe the mechanic. But it's not
with Mavic or Bontrager or whomever. So, to answer your specific question, "bad management" is to
blame. Sorry it cannot be more insidious than that.
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
"David L. Johnson" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:21:21 +0000, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
>
> >> Anyway, the days of riding on 32 spoked wheelsets built by some old guy at the bike shop are
> >> forever long gone. Old silly stuff like
Mavic's
> >> CXP-33, Open Pros, and MA3 aren't going to get you anywhere and look really cluncky.
> >
> > In the TDF, that's certainly true. I spent some time last night going
over
> > the photos I took during the last 3 TDFs. There were no "conventional" wheels in evidence in any
> > of the photos. Some of that has to do with sponsorship $$$, some with aerodynamics.
>
> BS. It _all_ had to do with sponsorship dollars.
>
> > Aerodynamics don't mean squat when you're in the middle of the peloton, but they can become
> > significant if you're off the front.
>
> I remember seeing Jalabert (sp?) reaching down to re-do his brake QR after a climb. His
> "high-tech" wheels gave so much on the climb that the brake would rub otherwise. Such an
> advantage. Also keep in mind the sight of the US Postal team time trial in '01, blown apart
> literally by crosswinds that caught the big flat sides of their aerodynamic wheels. Sure, they
> would have helped if the wind was calm, but it wasn't anywhere near calm and they rode them
> anyway. What's to blame there, bad management or the insistance of sponsors?
>
> --
>
> David L. Johnson
>
> __o | A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems. _`\(,_ | -- Paul Erdos
> (_)/ (_) |