On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:27:49 +0800, "Theo Bekkers"
<
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"byron27" wrote
>> TimC Wrote:
>>> I didn't have enough warning to
>>> grab my U-lock off the rack.
>>>
>> You need one of those Kryptonite Mini ULocks. They fit in to your
>> back
>> pocket for easy access and are useful for rearranging various parts
>> of
>> a car's bonnet, roof and side panels.
>
>Do some people really think resorting to, or advising, violence to
>other road users is a viable solution?
Some people do, all too often, alas. However, what's
happening here is just speen venting. Call it therapy if you
like.
> Do you think people in motor
>vehicles deliberately try to injure you?
Sometimes, most definatly. I know first-hand of people
who have been assaulted physically whilst riding by
occupiers of cars. I've had heavy objects thrown at
me myself (and I *don't* bash cars with random objects, but do
occasionally gesticulate when cutoff). Last week riding
along St Kilda Rd at 11pm I was "egged" while riding
in the bike lane, doing nothing more wrong than wearing a
bright yellow jersey. That was definatly an attempt to
intimidate, if not injure.
> And do you think retaliatory
>road rage on your part is justified or advisable?
Advisable, no, but justified, sometimes yes. If I could have
caught the turds that egged me, I've have felt quite justified
in force-feeding them the egg, and any remaining eggs they
may have been carrying.
>One and a half tonne car versus 10kg bike? I don't like the odds.
That's why I ride away (same thing on the motorbike). Doesn't
mean that retaliation isn't justified sometimes, just that it's
not likely to be successful!
You know this stuff Theo, I remember you from aus.moto, you're
either trolling, or drunk