60 minutes Lance Special

[Ben]

Anyone see it, I missed it, and I am not happy.

 

[GPLama]

"Ben" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Anyone see it, I missed it, and I am not happy.
>

Flick over to SBS.. they are currently running a Lance special for three
weeks..


...well.. someone had to say it

cheers,
GPL

 

[flyingdutch]

Anyone see it, I missed it, and I am not happy.

yeah. Sensationalist shite if it werent for the fact it's all true!

Cancer battle was highlighted and his work with that.
Hard to criticise tho. I guess after so many years we TdF 'regulars' just take all that for granted...

 

[Marx SS]

When was that 60 mins interview originally done?
2003?
2001?
1999?

It's good to see that channel 9 got by on that story by not saying the naughty "b" word (unless it was in reference to an activity done on a holiday destination).

 

[Tamyka Bell]

flyingdutch wrote:
>
> Ben Wrote:
> > Anyone see it, I missed it, and I am not happy.
>
> yeah. Sensationalist shite if it werent for the fact it's all true!
>
> Cancer battle was highlighted and his work with that.
> Hard to criticise tho. I guess after so many years we TdF 'regulars'
> just take all that for granted...
>
> --
> flyingdutch

As for "The Science of Lance Armstrong" there wasn't nearly enough
science to keep NerdTam happy.

Tam

PS I know some guys with a windtunnel...

 

[LotteBum]

I saw it and it was really quite good. The thing I really appreciate about people like Lance Armstrong (Pat Rafter is another prime example) is that they use their fame to achieve something positive... I take my hat off to the guy.

 

[flyingdutch]

PS I know some guys with a windtunnel...

and their just happy to see you?

Melbourne has a wind tunnel. Beach Road. EITHER WAY!!!

 

[Marc Bishop]

Is "The Science .." due to be shown again?
Obtainable from some seedy source?

"Tamyka Bell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> flyingdutch wrote:
>>
>> Ben Wrote:
>> > Anyone see it, I missed it, and I am not happy.
>>
>> yeah. Sensationalist shite if it werent for the fact it's all true!
>>
>> Cancer battle was highlighted and his work with that.
>> Hard to criticise tho. I guess after so many years we TdF 'regulars'
>> just take all that for granted...
>>
>> --
>> flyingdutch
>
> As for "The Science of Lance Armstrong" there wasn't nearly enough
> science to keep NerdTam happy.
>
> Tam
>
> PS I know some guys with a windtunnel...