Jim wrote:
> Carbon frames or steel?
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:57:37 -0800, joe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 7000+ beautiful Russian women
>> http://whatever
I read that as 700c Russian women. How sad is that
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:58:06 GMT, Stan Cox <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Jim wrote:
>> Carbon frames or steel?
>>
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:57:37 -0800, joe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> 7000+ beautiful Russian women
>>> http://whatever
>
> I read that as 700c Russian women. How sad is that
>
>Stan Cox
In article <[email protected]>,
still just me <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:58:06 GMT, Stan Cox <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Jim wrote:
> >> Carbon frames or steel?
> >>
> >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:57:37 -0800, joe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 7000+ beautiful Russian women
> >>> http://whatever
> >
> > I read that as 700c Russian women. How sad is that
> >
> >Stan Cox
>
> Geez, glad it wasn't only me.
Yes. According to the site, these women are pneumatic!
What, am I the only one that discovered that rather curious phrase for
curvaceous femininity while reading _Brave New World_?
As long as they're not 'bent women,
--
Ryan Cousineau [email protected]http://www.wiredcola.com/
"My scenarios may give the impression I could be an excellent crook.
Not true - I am a talented lawyer." - Sandy in rec.bicycles.racing