....any reason this wouldn't work?
What's the actual difference in diameter, and which is bigger?
--
John
Is that the truth, or is your News Limited?
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
....any reason this wouldn't work?
What's the actual difference in diameter, and which is bigger?
--
John
Is that the truth, or is your News Limited?
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:20:54 -0000, John Pitts <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:...any reason this wouldn't work?
What's the actual difference in diameter, and which is bigger?
I have some 700c tires that are labelled 28" and a 27" frame that is
now 700c. The front brake pivots needed moving and the rear spread for
the wider axle. Easy with steel.
In aus.bicycle on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:20:54 -0000
John Pitts said:...any reason this wouldn't work?
What's the actual difference in diameter, and which is bigger?
People put 700C wheels into 'bents that used 26" so should fit. Main
hassle with 26 -> 700C is apparently brake mountings.
Zebee
The brake blocks need to drop about 4mm. I did it on one of my old touring
bikes a few years back when it was getting difficult to find good quality
fat touring tyres.
"John Pitts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:...any reason this wouldn't work?
What's the actual difference in diameter, and which is bigger?
NickP said:The brake blocks need to drop about 4mm. I did it on one of my old touring
bikes a few years back when it was getting difficult to find good quality
fat touring tyres.
So 700C is a bit smaller. I'll have to look at the brakes now.
Thanks for your comments everybody.
--
John
I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.