LOL.. God forbid that there should ever be CHANGE in this world.... I have always top posted and
found it to be "organic" for me.
Personally, I think it stupid to have to sift through posts to try an find what the latest poster
had to say..
I guess that my brain just works on a level where some things are easiily understood without having
to be continually reminded.
When I post in reponse to a general theme, (such as this), I top post.. When answering specific
points, I answer, (or comment), by line.
(actually I like to see small people get their panties in a bind over something trivial). ;-)
Danny
"cbc" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> What nonsense. The only conventions regarding top posting are to be found in the tiny minds of
> arrogant cybercops. Many, many people top post. You're free to do as you like, of course, but
> please don't try to force
your
> prejudices on the rest of us.
>
>
> "Tim McNamara" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:[email protected]...
> > In article <
[email protected]>, "alan"
> > <
[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Damn! Here I was thinking that what someone had to say was the important part, not where they
> > > put it!
> >
> > What they have to say is important, but how they say it is also important. If posters develop
> > these simple skills, that helps the rest of the world understand your point(s) in context. The
> > conventions for posting in Usenet have been in place for 20+ years and developed "organically"
> > for a very good set of reasons.