On 18/2/04 1:59 pm, in article
[email protected],
"MSeries" <
[email protected]> wrote:
> dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers wrote: Sustrans - it's
>> main aim, it seems to me, is to get cyclists off roads, at all costs, on to often totally
>> unsuitable farcilities that are way more dangerous than cycling on road. Plus it sends out the
>> signal to motorists that cyclists shouldn't be on the road...
>>
>
> I don't see the work of Sustrans that way at all. I choose not to use some of the Sustrans paths
> probably for the same reasons as you, however I do choose to use some(Route 66, the Spen Valley
> Greenway) when I want to potter. Whilst using these I see many cyclists who IMHO would not be
> cycling if there were no such path, in particular older people, people with little cycling
> experience and family groups. I agree that some facilities seem like a waste of time and money but
> do not think that their main aim is to get cyclists off roads, rather to get people cycling.
>
> I doubt I would have completed the C2C (twice) and Lon Las Cymru if Sustrans hadn't mapped,
> publicised and sign posted these routes. There are different types of cyclists and Sustrans are
> not going to please all of us.
>
Our local NCN routes are quite nice. NCN 77 takes you out of Dundee aff road alongside the Tay and
then on minor roads through to Perth. The only downside is a steep hill (1:7) but the rest of it is
fast and well signposted.
I haven't followed it further yet.
NCN 1 goes into Fife and then ends up doing off-road things in Tentsmuir forest which could be
interesting but I haven't tried that one either. There are probably nice on road routes in Fife.
..d