About an old BMX and mountain bike legend.



JD wrote:
> Punter wrote:
> > And you have not explained what makes my asking about the birthdate and
> > the retirement status of a bike racer "stalkeresque"?
>
>
> If you have to ask, then you'll never understand, psycho.
>
> > Did you find a
> > site with her birthdate and/or retirement status using your highly
> > competent search skills? If so, what is it since you imply that it
> > would be so easy to find.
>
>
> WTF would I want to know about some has-been bmx racerist person?
> You're the punter who cross-posted this to a mountain biking newsgroup
> and are still thrashing about in it.
>
> > Don't point to Wikipedia since I wrote the
> > article in the first place and got the data I wanted from other
> > sources:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheri_Elliott
>
>
> Don't worry, weak-o-pedia is only as good as the information dilweeds
> like you put in it and I'll never use it.
>
> > If you don't answer affirmatively this will be an excellent example of
> > the ad hominem attack, as if your first response wasn't.
>
>
> Again, I'll add hominy to my menudo every time I make it.
>
> JD
----
Please do, apparently you can't do without it the insults. It is clear
for all the world to see.

---->Hunter
 
"Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> JD wrote:
>> Punter wrote:
>> > And you have not explained what makes my asking about the birthdate and
>> > the retirement status of a bike racer "stalkeresque"?
>>
>>
>> If you have to ask, then you'll never understand, psycho.
>>
>> > Did you find a
>> > site with her birthdate and/or retirement status using your highly
>> > competent search skills? If so, what is it since you imply that it
>> > would be so easy to find.
>>
>>
>> WTF would I want to know about some has-been bmx racerist person?
>> You're the punter who cross-posted this to a mountain biking newsgroup
>> and are still thrashing about in it.
>>
>> > Don't point to Wikipedia since I wrote the
>> > article in the first place and got the data I wanted from other
>> > sources:
>> >
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheri_Elliott
>>
>>
>> Don't worry, weak-o-pedia is only as good as the information dilweeds
>> like you put in it and I'll never use it.
>>
>> > If you don't answer affirmatively this will be an excellent example of
>> > the ad hominem attack, as if your first response wasn't.
>>
>>
>> Again, I'll add hominy to my menudo every time I make it.
>>
>> JD
> ----
> Please do, apparently you can't do without it the insults. It is clear
> for all the world to see.
>
> ---->Hunter
>

How's that rope doing? Do you live in New York? You seem to be a
"Yank-ee" fan.
 
On 4 Jan 2006 12:12:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Curtis L. Russell wrote:
>> On 2 Jan 2006 15:37:46 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >Just resorting to it. If you have the strong base of reason and
>> >argument to support a position the need for insults would not exist.
>> >Insults are often used to obscure the weakness of an assumption or
>> >conclusion. That is the basis of the ad hominem attack.
>>
>> The above is a refutation of your original comment. 'Often' does not
>> make an argument, much less prove a direct relationship between
>> insults and weak arguments. Nor does wishing it so make it so. But
>> feel free to try again.
>>
>> Curtis L. Russell
>> Odenton, MD (USA)
>> Just someone on two wheels..
>---
>I did not intend for my answer to be a totally scientific one, just a
>trend of behavior, just like people who offer large crackpot conspiracy
>theories like the government staging 9/11 tend to make people who
>question them prove a negative. In this situation with my request for
>information, instead of helping or asking questions it was assumed I
>wanted the info for nefarious reasons and/or I couldn't use a search
>engine. There was no intellectual reasons offered or asked for by the
>respondents, just the assumptions and the disparaging remarks to go
>with those assumptions. When I explained what it was for and provided a
>rational argument as to why they were wrong, more insults and still no
>explanation as to why they would have thought what they thought with
>the except from one person and it was pretty vague and weak, something
>about clues in the body of my post and my screen tag. The insults did
>not come with any arguments, but offered in there stead. That was the
>ad hominem response I was speaking of and such a tactic is a sign of
>the lack of a strong base of reasons for their assumptions and yes it
>does often happen that way. As to wishing it trying to make it so, it
>has nothing to do with wishing, it is just an observation; and I have
>yet to receive an explanation as to why my two questions about a
>birthday and retirement status is stalking.
>
>Does hurling insults make it a sure sign of intellectual bankruptcy?
>Maybe, maybe not, but it is surely unnecessary. Why would it be? And
>still an explanation for their belief has not been offered.

Dumbass

You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
it's not even July.

Ron
 
RonSonic wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2006 12:12:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Curtis L. Russell wrote:
> >> On 2 Jan 2006 15:37:46 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >>
> >> >Just resorting to it. If you have the strong base of reason and
> >> >argument to support a position the need for insults would not exist.
> >> >Insults are often used to obscure the weakness of an assumption or
> >> >conclusion. That is the basis of the ad hominem attack.
> >>
> >> The above is a refutation of your original comment. 'Often' does not
> >> make an argument, much less prove a direct relationship between
> >> insults and weak arguments. Nor does wishing it so make it so. But
> >> feel free to try again.
> >>
> >> Curtis L. Russell
> >> Odenton, MD (USA)
> >> Just someone on two wheels..
> >---
> >I did not intend for my answer to be a totally scientific one, just a
> >trend of behavior, just like people who offer large crackpot conspiracy
> >theories like the government staging 9/11 tend to make people who
> >question them prove a negative. In this situation with my request for
> >information, instead of helping or asking questions it was assumed I
> >wanted the info for nefarious reasons and/or I couldn't use a search
> >engine. There was no intellectual reasons offered or asked for by the
> >respondents, just the assumptions and the disparaging remarks to go
> >with those assumptions. When I explained what it was for and provided a
> >rational argument as to why they were wrong, more insults and still no
> >explanation as to why they would have thought what they thought with
> >the except from one person and it was pretty vague and weak, something
> >about clues in the body of my post and my screen tag. The insults did
> >not come with any arguments, but offered in there stead. That was the
> >ad hominem response I was speaking of and such a tactic is a sign of
> >the lack of a strong base of reasons for their assumptions and yes it
> >does often happen that way. As to wishing it trying to make it so, it
> >has nothing to do with wishing, it is just an observation; and I have
> >yet to receive an explanation as to why my two questions about a
> >birthday and retirement status is stalking.
> >
> >Does hurling insults make it a sure sign of intellectual bankruptcy?
> >Maybe, maybe not, but it is surely unnecessary. Why would it be? And
> >still an explanation for their belief has not been offered.
>
> Dumbass
>
> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
> it's not even July.
>
> Ron
----
Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
thank you for proving my point.

---->Hunnter
 
"Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> RonSonic wrote:
> > On 4 Jan 2006 12:12:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Curtis L. Russell wrote:
> > >> On 2 Jan 2006 15:37:46 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Just resorting to it. If you have the strong base of reason and
> > >> >argument to support a position the need for insults would not exist.
> > >> >Insults are often used to obscure the weakness of an assumption or
> > >> >conclusion. That is the basis of the ad hominem attack.
> > >>
> > >> The above is a refutation of your original comment. 'Often' does not
> > >> make an argument, much less prove a direct relationship between
> > >> insults and weak arguments. Nor does wishing it so make it so. But
> > >> feel free to try again.
> > >>
> > >> Curtis L. Russell
> > >> Odenton, MD (USA)
> > >> Just someone on two wheels..
> > >---
> > >I did not intend for my answer to be a totally scientific one, just a
> > >trend of behavior, just like people who offer large crackpot conspiracy
> > >theories like the government staging 9/11 tend to make people who
> > >question them prove a negative. In this situation with my request for
> > >information, instead of helping or asking questions it was assumed I
> > >wanted the info for nefarious reasons and/or I couldn't use a search
> > >engine. There was no intellectual reasons offered or asked for by the
> > >respondents, just the assumptions and the disparaging remarks to go
> > >with those assumptions. When I explained what it was for and provided a
> > >rational argument as to why they were wrong, more insults and still no
> > >explanation as to why they would have thought what they thought with
> > >the except from one person and it was pretty vague and weak, something
> > >about clues in the body of my post and my screen tag. The insults did
> > >not come with any arguments, but offered in there stead. That was the
> > >ad hominem response I was speaking of and such a tactic is a sign of
> > >the lack of a strong base of reasons for their assumptions and yes it
> > >does often happen that way. As to wishing it trying to make it so, it
> > >has nothing to do with wishing, it is just an observation; and I have
> > >yet to receive an explanation as to why my two questions about a
> > >birthday and retirement status is stalking.
> > >
> > >Does hurling insults make it a sure sign of intellectual bankruptcy?
> > >Maybe, maybe not, but it is surely unnecessary. Why would it be? And
> > >still an explanation for their belief has not been offered.
> >
> > Dumbass
> >
> > You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or
drugs and
> > it's not even July.
> >
> > Ron
> ----
> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
> thank you for proving my point.

I strongly urge you to quit while you still have a will. You are getting
more stupid, and the sharks are feeding on dumb chub at the moment.

Ahem:

"... something *other* than Lance or drugs and... "



Shaun aRe
 
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:33:06 -0000, "Shaun aRe" <[email protected]>
wrote:


>> > >Does hurling insults make it a sure sign of intellectual bankruptcy?
>> > >Maybe, maybe not, but it is surely unnecessary. Why would it be? And
>> > >still an explanation for their belief has not been offered.
>> >
>> > Dumbass
>> >
>> > You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
>> > it's not even July.
>> >
>> > Ron
>> ----
>> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
>> thank you for proving my point.
>
>I strongly urge you to quit while you still have a will. You are getting
>more stupid, and the sharks are feeding on dumb chub at the moment.
>
>Ahem:
>
>"... something *other* than Lance or drugs and... "

I can't help it, he keeps bobbing up and down in the water and splashing and he
makes this cute little shriek every time you take another chunk out of him.

Ron
 
On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>RonSonic wrote:

>> Dumbass
>>
>> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
>> it's not even July.
>>
>> Ron
>----
>Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
>thank you for proving my point.

Dumbass

Ron
 
"RonSonic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:33:06 -0000, "Shaun aRe"
<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> >> > >Does hurling insults make it a sure sign of intellectual bankruptcy?
> >> > >Maybe, maybe not, but it is surely unnecessary. Why would it be? And
> >> > >still an explanation for their belief has not been offered.
> >> >
> >> > Dumbass
> >> >
> >> > You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or
drugs and
> >> > it's not even July.
> >> >
> >> > Ron
> >> ----
> >> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
> >> thank you for proving my point.
> >
> >I strongly urge you to quit while you still have a will. You are getting
> >more stupid, and the sharks are feeding on dumb chub at the moment.
> >
> >Ahem:
> >
> >"... something *other* than Lance or drugs and... "
>
> I can't help it, he keeps bobbing up and down in the water and splashing
and he
> makes this cute little shriek every time you take another chunk out of
him.
>
> Ron

I know, but despite my alien genetics I have this... somewhat human side to
me, I feel a kinda, funny little tugging deep inside when I see defenceless
people digging themselves in deeper and deeper into the hole, and being
ripped to shreds while doing so. I think it's called, sympathy? Oh well,
whatever it is it will soon pass, as it always does.

',;~}~


Shaun aRe
--
Sometimes, the true and living thought bubbling rapidly up from the
depths of the mind, surfaces with a severe case of the Bends.
 
Shaun aRe wrote:
> I know, but despite my alien genetics I have this... somewhat human side to
> me, I feel a kinda, funny little tugging deep inside when I see defenceless
> people digging themselves in deeper and deeper into the hole, and being
> ripped to shreds while doing so. I think it's called, sympathy? Oh well,
> whatever it is it will soon pass, as it always does.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec....a1963f4dd?q=sierraman&rnum=8#590550ca1963f4dd
 
RonSonic wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >RonSonic wrote:
>
> >> Dumbass
> >>
> >> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
> >> it's not even July.
> >>
> >> Ron
> >----
> >Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
> >thank you for proving my point.
>
> Dumbass
>
> Ron
----
Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone else?
If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history because I
have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other than that
<shrug>.

---->Hunter
 
Hunter wrote:
> RonSonic wrote:
>> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> RonSonic wrote:
>>
>>>> Dumbass
>>>>
>>>> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance
>>>> or drugs and it's not even July.
>>>>
>>>> Ron
>>> ----
>>> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh
>>> and thank you for proving my point.
>>
>> Dumbass
>>
>> Ron
> ----
> Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone
> else? If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history
> because I have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other
> than that <shrug>.

Moron, LEARN TO READ. (Hint: it's still right up there, staring you in the
face.)

PS: Got a pic of this hot chick?!? Maybe we'll forgive you for posting
here <eg>
 
In article <[email protected]>,
RonSonic <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:33:06 -0000, "Shaun aRe" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> >> > >Does hurling insults make it a sure sign of intellectual bankruptcy?
> >> > >Maybe, maybe not, but it is surely unnecessary. Why would it be? And
> >> > >still an explanation for their belief has not been offered.
> >> >
> >> > Dumbass
> >> >
> >> > You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
> >> > it's not even July.
> >> >
> >> > Ron
> >> ----
> >> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
> >> thank you for proving my point.
> >
> >I strongly urge you to quit while you still have a will. You are getting
> >more stupid, and the sharks are feeding on dumb chub at the moment.
> >
> >Ahem:
> >
> >"... something *other* than Lance or drugs and... "
>
> I can't help it, he keeps bobbing up and down in the water and splashing and he
> makes this cute little shriek every time you take another chunk out of him.

Post of the Month.

--
Michael Press
 
Hunter wrote:
> JD wrote:
> > Hunter wrote:
> > > [email protected] wrote:
> > > > Hiya Hunter!
> > > > Don't know about Cheri Elliot's active/retired status, but would you
> > > > be interested in her rookie card. Oh, wait, they don't do bubblegum
> > > > cards for bike racers, do they?
> > > >
> > > > Robert Leone [email protected]
> > > ----
> > > And the point of your post is.....?
> > >
> > > --->Hunter
> >
> >
> > Your obsession/hero-worshipping is sad, yet amusing.
> >
> > JD adds homenim to his menudo recipe
> ---
> Did you know what it is for? Wikipedia:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheri_Elliott


I'm sure that the whole ten people who read that tripe in the same
numer of years will be thrilled.

> I have been also working on expanding a Wikipedia article on BMX in
> general:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMX


Then WTF are you cross-posting this in a mountain bike newsgroup,
moron? Your weak-o-pedia articles are almost as lame as GRS.

> If you check the history of the articles I'm Hunter2005. Just plain
> "Hunter" was already taken, emphasizing my point of how many "Hunters"
> are on the 'net.


The punter named hunter, stalker of the not so famous.

> I intend to write similar write ups for other BMX legends like Stu
> Thompson and Harry Leary. I chosed Cheri Elliott as my first subject
> because in the original form of the BMX Wiki article no mention of any
> female racers were mentioned.


Who?

> If it is hero worship to help expand and expose BMX in particular and
> cycling in general and its participants to a larger audience then I am
> a worshiper I guess.
>
> ---->Hunter


Thin skin and a thick skull to match. How do you manage to tie your
shoes?

JD
 
Hunter wrote:
> JD wrote:
> > Punter wrote:
> > > And you have not explained what makes my asking about the birthdate and
> > > the retirement status of a bike racer "stalkeresque"?
> >
> >
> > If you have to ask, then you'll never understand, psycho.
> >
> > > Did you find a
> > > site with her birthdate and/or retirement status using your highly
> > > competent search skills? If so, what is it since you imply that it
> > > would be so easy to find.
> >
> >
> > WTF would I want to know about some has-been bmx racerist person?
> > You're the punter who cross-posted this to a mountain biking newsgroup
> > and are still thrashing about in it.
> >
> > > Don't point to Wikipedia since I wrote the
> > > article in the first place and got the data I wanted from other
> > > sources:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheri_Elliott
> >
> >
> > Don't worry, weak-o-pedia is only as good as the information dilweeds
> > like you put in it and I'll never use it.
> >
> > > If you don't answer affirmatively this will be an excellent example of
> > > the ad hominem attack, as if your first response wasn't.
> >
> >
> > Again, I'll add hominy to my menudo every time I make it.
> >
> > JD
> ----
> Please do, apparently you can't do without it the insults. It is clear
> for all the world to see.
>
> ---->Hunter


I've been exposed as the monster that I really am! I'm so ashamed...

HAHAHAHA!

Keep wanking away, punter.

JD
 
"Sorni" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hunter wrote:
>> RonSonic wrote:
>>> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> RonSonic wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Dumbass
>>>>>
>>>>> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance
>>>>> or drugs and it's not even July.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron
>>>> ----
>>>> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh
>>>> and thank you for proving my point.
>>>
>>> Dumbass
>>>
>>> Ron
>> ----
>> Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone
>> else? If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history
>> because I have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other
>> than that <shrug>.
>
> Moron, LEARN TO READ. (Hint: it's still right up there, staring you in
> the face.)
>
> PS: Got a pic of this hot chick?!? Maybe we'll forgive you for posting
> here <eg>
>

This is just too good.

You're actually going to have to pull it out of the post and highlight in
red to
show him what he DIDN'T say.

You really are too nice.

Marty
 
Marty wrote:
> "Sorni" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Hunter wrote:
> >> RonSonic wrote:
> >>> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> RonSonic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Dumbass
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance
> >>>>> or drugs and it's not even July.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ron
> >>>> ----
> >>>> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh
> >>>> and thank you for proving my point.
> >>>
> >>> Dumbass
> >>>
> >>> Ron
> >> ----
> >> Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone
> >> else? If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history
> >> because I have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other
> >> than that <shrug>.
> >
> > Moron, LEARN TO READ. (Hint: it's still right up there, staring you in
> > the face.)
> >
> > PS: Got a pic of this hot chick?!? Maybe we'll forgive you for posting
> > here <eg>
> >
>
> This is just too good.
>
> You're actually going to have to pull it out of the post and highlight in
> red to
> show him what he DIDN'T say.
>
> You really are too nice.
>
> Marty
----
Yes, that is what is going to take.

---->Hunter
 
On 5 Jan 2006 10:05:11 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>RonSonic wrote:
>> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >RonSonic wrote:
>>
>> >> Dumbass
>> >>
>> >> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
>> >> it's not even July.
>> >>
>> >> Ron
>> >----
>> >Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
>> >thank you for proving my point.
>>
>> Dumbass
>>
>> Ron
>----
>Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone else?
>If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history because I
>have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other than that
><shrug>.

Dumbass -

You're a newb. Newbs post in July. They post about Lance. Everybody argues about
drugs. You didn't mention Lance or drugs, it's not even july. You never read
the stupid "netiquette guides," did ya. There's thousands of 'em, they all say
to lurk before posting. According to google "Dumbass" has been used 5900 times
in this group, that's more than anyplace except alt.flame, dumbass - 5902.

Dude, you just stuck your head in the mens locker room and asked if anyone's
seen your girlfriend.

"Dumbass - do your own damn stalking (5903)" is the closest thing to "good luck"
you're gonna get around here, unless she's really cute and you post pictures.
But then we wouldn't share the info, dumbass - 5904

Ron
 
In article
<[email protected]>,
"Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Marty wrote:
> > "Sorni" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Hunter wrote:
> > >> RonSonic wrote:
> > >>> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> RonSonic wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Dumbass
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance
> > >>>>> or drugs and it's not even July.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Ron
> > >>>> ----
> > >>>> Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh
> > >>>> and thank you for proving my point.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dumbass
> > >>>
> > >>> Ron
> > >> ----
> > >> Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone
> > >> else? If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history
> > >> because I have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other
> > >> than that <shrug>.
> > >
> > > Moron, LEARN TO READ. (Hint: it's still right up there, staring you in
> > > the face.)
> > >
> > > PS: Got a pic of this hot chick?!? Maybe we'll forgive you for posting
> > > here <eg>
> > >
> >
> > This is just too good.
> >
> > You're actually going to have to pull it out of the post and highlight in
> > red to
> > show him what he DIDN'T say.
> >
> > You really are too nice.
> >
> > Marty
> ----
> Yes, that is what is going to take.

This one winds himself up. I could post a paragraph about
maple trees and he'd find something to say.

--
Michael Press
 
RonSonic wrote:
> On 5 Jan 2006 10:05:11 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >RonSonic wrote:
> >> On 4 Jan 2006 23:35:51 -0800, "Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >RonSonic wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Dumbass
> >> >>
> >> >> You posted to wreck bike racing about something other than Lance or drugs and
> >> >> it's not even July.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ron
> >> >----
> >> >Really? Where? I posted nothing about Lance Armstrong or drugs. Oh and
> >> >thank you for proving my point.
> >>
> >> Dumbass
> >>
> >> Ron
> >----
> >Ok, one last shot at reason: Do you and others think I am someone else?
> >If so, I suggest you check my headers and posting history because I
> >have never posted anything about Lance Armstrong. Other than that
> ><shrug>.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> You're a newb. Newbs post in July. They post about Lance. Everybody argues about
> drugs. You didn't mention Lance or drugs, it's not even july. You never read
> the stupid "netiquette guides," did ya. There's thousands of 'em, they all say
> to lurk before posting. According to google "Dumbass" has been used 5900 times
> in this group, that's more than anyplace except alt.flame, dumbass - 5902.
>
> Dude, you just stuck your head in the mens locker room and asked if anyone's
> seen your girlfriend.
>
> "Dumbass - do your own damn stalking (5903)" is the closest thing to "good luck"
> you're gonna get around here, unless she's really cute and you post pictures.
> But then we wouldn't share the info, dumbass - 5904
>
> Ron
---
How does dumbass relate to cycling?

---->Hunter
 
Hunter wrote:

> How does dumbass relate to cycling?

Numbass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
About an old BMX and mountain bike legend.
Replies
81
Views
2K
UK and Europe
Shaun aRe
S
H
About an old BMX and mountain bike legend.
Replies
79
Views
3K
Mountain Bikes
Shaun aRe
S
H
About an old BMX and mountain bike legend.
Replies
76
Views
2K
Road Cycling
Shaun aRe
S
Eddie Stanley
Bmx bike should i buy for 8 year old son
Replies
19
Views
3K
Cycling Equipment
kkees
kkees
azul_fahrrad
Seeking advice on a BMX bike for a seven year old
Replies
3
Views
5K
Bike buying advice
alfeng
alfeng
JumpinThRattler
too old for a bmx?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Bike buying advice
JumpinThRattler
JumpinThRattler
R
old-standard BMX fork: make it work with road quill stem?
Replies
11
Views
412
Cycling Equipment
Sir Ridesalot
S
L
Help me ID this old BMX frame?
Replies
5
Views
479
Cycling Equipment
Bellsouth Ijit 2.0
B
10timesbetter
possible to put a bmx sprocket on an old road hub?
Replies
0
Views
2K
Cycling Equipment
10timesbetter
10timesbetter
10timesbetter
possible to put a bmx sprocket on an old road hub?
Replies
6
Views
7K
Singlespeed
lifehasnovalue
lifehasnovalue
Top Bottom Back