On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:47:19 -0600, "Kim" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Mark Probert-March 13, 2004" <Mark Probert03-13-
>
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:aPF4c.17330>
>> Jan is Hulda's biggest defender.
>============================
>I can't help but wonder,.... what "benefit" is Jan getting
>out of defending this Clark women?
It is not clear if Jan is receiving monetary compensation
from Hulda Clark in return for her advocacy and shilling.
If not, may I offer the likely dynamics behind her defending
Hulda Clark. I believe, based upon Jan's presentation as
suggested by her posts, that she is a somatically
hypervigilant person who is easily suggestible. When
conventional medicine diagnosed her with peripheral
neuropathy and told her that they did not know what caused
it Jan Drew could not accept this.
She then tried to find out the cause. She discovered her
friend Hulda Clark wrote some books and began to read them.
She became first convinced that she had a parasite
infestation and was effectively treated by Hulda's zapper
and cleanse. At that point Jan was convinced that parasites
were the cause of ALL her problems.
Now Jan trusted Hulda Clark so when she read about amalgam
mercury connection she was almost sure that this explained
her problem. After she experienced dramatic improvement
following removal of amalgam that was likely placebo since
her neuropathic pain returned and she remained on Elavil
and Neurontin to treat her pain, she again was convinced
that Hulda Clark was right.
Jan Drew then became quite angry at conventional medicine
for not finding what she thought was the root of her
problem. So Jan Drew enters mha to both bash conventional
medicine and to promote her friend Hulda Clark.
At this point however I am thouroughly convinced that Jan
Drew no longer believes that she had mercury poisoning. Her
ego will not allow her to admit she is wrong. So instead of
reconciling her numerous contradictory statements she
pretends to kill file me and then attacks me from behind her
kill file in order to discredit my opinion. Any clear
thinking person who reads Jan's own words realizes that she
is a pathologic liar who attacks those who expose her
******** claims.
Aloha,
Rich
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance
