"Stuart Dalby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Ian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Whilst it is nice to have a cycle lane in place to help
cyclists
Quoted message said:reach
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:an advanced stop line (ASL), the lack of a cycle lane does not
prevent
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:a cyclist from approaching the ASL and using it. Whether there
is
Quoted message said:a
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:cycle lane or not, if it is not safe to progress, stop.
I think you will find that if there is a solid line to the front
and
Quoted message said:rear of
Quoted message said:the ASL, and no cycle lane entering the box then it is illegal to
use it
Quoted message said:technically.
A few people's posts suggest it is not legal. I've had a quick
online
Quoted message said:search for clarification but haven't found any. Has anyone a link?
Here in London, Ralph Smyth, Coordinator of the City branch of the London Cycling Campaign, who is a
barrister, has been following this matter. If I understand correctly what he has said, he reports
that it has been illegal to cross the back stop line since the law was changed in January. What
seems to have happened is that the idiots ( not Ralph's description)who drew up the new law decided
(by accident/incompetance I presume, rather than malice) that bicycles were not proper vehicles, and
so forbade "vehicles" from crossing the line rather than "motor vehicles". I don't know whether
there has to be a lane approaching a gap in the stop line for it to be legal to go through the gap.
The obvious remedy is for those who perpetrated the mistake to rectify it, but I haven't heard of
any moves for them to do so.
Jeremy Parker
Quoted message said:
Thanks, Stuart radox.freeserve.co.ukdriving.htmOpen ↗