- Mar 10, 2004
I think that linear acceleration of the slightly greater weight of a triple is a greater concern than rotational acceleration, but not a big one. I think that simplicity, and better chain lines for your two main chainrings, are the better arguments for a double.quickbuck said:May not be more than 1 to 2w, but there is the extra weight.
I agree the figures are small, but over time it all adds up.
Myself, I'm convinced. No need for a triple chain ring.
The only reason a hill will beat me is because I am not fit enough.