PF:- What does Darwinism (Charles's by now basically 'largely deemed almost divine' theoretical thinking) and Edserianism (our own John Edser's the-more-deeply-looked-into-the-more-dubious denouncements of DNA-centered scholarly pursuits, and some professors' perhaps somewhat narrow views or philosophical outlooks or opinions (intellectual views and opinions implicitly of/on our own and fellow organisms' origin in the necessarily slightly uneven interplay within the Evolutionary Pressure Totality) have in common? Answer: Both are based on kinds of thinking that: works, were arrived at, and are generated by "brain functionalities" that evolved, in a manner explained by AEVASIVE (and just a few auxilliary other concEPTS). JE:- Of course the view that everybody is being AEVASIVE except PF is simply not _self_ consistent with PF's AEVASIVE theory. PF has to prove he is not just suffering from paranoid self delusion by proving that he and his AEVASIVE theory is not just being AEVASIVE, also. Welcome to Epimenides Paradox the epistemological black hole out of which nothing emerges.... Best Wishes, John Edser Independent Researcher PO Box 266 Church Pt NSW 2105 Australia [email protected]
"John Edser" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > PF:- What does Darwinism (Charles's by now basically 'largely deemed almost divine' theoretical > thinking) and Edserianism (our own John Edser's the-more-deeply-looked-into-the-more-dubious > denouncements of DNA-centered scholarly pursuits, and some professors' perhaps somewhat narrow > views or philosophical outlooks or opinions (intellectual views and opinions implicitly of/on our > own and fellow organisms' origin in the necessarily slightly uneven interplay within the > Evolutionary Pressure Totality) have in > common? > > Answer: Both are based on kinds of thinking that: works, were arrived at, and are generated by > "brain functionalities" that evolved, in a manner explained by > AEVASIVE (and just a few auxilliary other concEPTS). > > JE:- Of course the view that everybody is being AEVASIVE except PF is simply not _self_ consistent > with PF's AEVASIVE theory. PF has to prove he is not just suffering from paranoid self delusion by > proving that he and his AEVASIVE theory is not just being AEVASIVE, also. > > Welcome to Epimenides Paradox the epistemological black hole out of which nothing emerges.... Where did you get the idea from that I think I am not AEVASIVE? My only self-confessed absolute position of opinion (which I can only apologize for, if it gets up your olfactories) is that I am the most ideologically EPT person that ever lived. %-}}} Consider this: Some of the things that this World deserves, are more perversely unrelenting unifying anthropobiological analyses; attempts at promoting the far and wide formation of science-aligned Philanthropically Oriented Opinions, and for these pursuits to be accompanied by - thereby made more fun and bearable by - (implicitly AEVASIVE) humour. I personally (at least *try* to) offer - over and over again - SEPTIC such (light-making, and with Science aligned) stuff. %-> Best Wishes P
> PF:- What does Darwinism (Charles's by now basically 'largely deemed almost > divine' theoretical thinking) and Edserianism (our own John Edser's the-more-deeply-looked-into-the-more- > dubious denouncements of DNA-centered scholarly pursuits, and some professors' > perhaps somewhat narrow views or philosophical outlooks or opinions > (intellectual views and opinions implicitly of/on our own and fellow organisms' > origin in the necessarily slightly uneven interplay within the Evolutionary > Pressure Totality) have in common? Answer: Both are based on kinds of thinking > that: works, were arrived at, and are generated by "brain functionalities" that > evolved, in a manner explained by AEVASIVE (and just a few auxilliary other > concEPTS). > JE:- Of course the view that everybody is being AEVASIVE except PF is simply > not _self_ consistent with PF's AEVASIVE theory. PF has to prove he is not just > suffering from paranoid self delusion by proving that he and his AEVASIVE > theory is not just being AEVASIVE, also. Welcome to Epimenides Paradox the > epistemological black hole out of which nothing emerges.... PF:- Where did you get the idea from that I think I am not AEVASIVE? JE:- Then you are just another Cretan that has been telling us for nearly 2000 years that all Cretans are lairs. Can we believe you or not? PF:- My only self-confessed absolute position of opinion (which I can only apologize for, if it gets up your olfactories) is that I am the most ideologically EPT person that ever lived. %-}}} Consider this: Some of the things that this World deserves, are more perversely unrelenting unifying anthropobiological analyses; attempts at promoting the far and wide formation of science-aligned Philanthropically Oriented Opinions, and for these pursuits to be accompanied by - thereby made more fun and bearable by - (implicitly AEVASIVE) humour. I personally (at least *try* to) offer - over and over again - SEPTIC such (light-making, and with Science aligned) stuff. %-> JE:- OK, I am sure we all agree that you are funny. Best Wishes, John Edser Independent Researcher PO Box 266 Church Pt NSW 2105 Australia [email protected]
"John Edser" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... .... > > PF:- Where did you get the idea from that I think I am not > AEVASIVE? > > JE:- Then you are just another Cretan that has been > telling us for nearly 2000 years that all Cretans are > lairs. Can we believe you or not? > Show me an example of were I wrote/inferred something to the effect of that I am "not AEVASIVE"! P
> PF:- Where did you get the idea from that I think I am not > AEVASIVE? > JE:- Then you are just another Cretan that has been > telling us for nearly 2000 years that all Cretans are > lairs. Can we believe you or not? PF:- Show me an example of were I wrote/inferred something to the effect of that I am "not AEVASIVE"! JE:- Can't you see that if you say "All Cretans are Liars (i.e. are AEVASIVE) and YOU are a Cretan (i.e. you are being AEVASIVE by just suggesting if) that just _zero_ content is contained within such nonsense? An AEVASIVE person cannot claim they know that they and everybody else is being AEVASIVE, only a TESTED to be NON AEVASIVE person can validly claim such a thing. THUS:- Either: YOU claim to be a TESTED NON AEVASIVE person allowing a "holier than thou" attitude, or you include yourself (as you have done) and just end up absolutely contradicting yourself, i.g. you and your AEVASIVE theory both enter Epimenides Paradox and-just-never-come-out. Regards, John Edser Independent Researcher PO Box 266 Church Pt NSW 2105 Australia [email protected]
"John Edser" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > > > > PF:- Where did you get the idea from that I think I am > > not AEVASIVE? > > > JE:- Then you are just another Cretan that has been > > telling us for nearly 2000 years that all Cretans are > > lairs. Can we believe you or not? > > PF:- Show me an example of were I wrote/inferred something > to the effect of that > I am "not AEVASIVE"! > > JE:- Can't you see that if you say "All Cretans are Liars > (i.e. are AEVASIVE) and YOU are a Cretan > (i.e. you are being AEVASIVE by just suggesting > it) that just _zero_ content is contained within such > nonsense? > > An AEVASIVE person cannot claim they know that they and > everybody else is being AEVASIVE, only a TESTED to be NON > AEVASIVE person can validly claim such a thing. > > THUS:- Either: YOU claim to be a TESTED NON AEVASIVE > person allowing a "holier than thou" attitude, or you > include yourself (as you have done) and just end up > absolutely contradicting yourself, > i.e. you and your AEVASIVE theory both enter Epimenides > Paradox and-just-never-come-out. EPT (~ the sum total of often embarrassing textual tracks left by me that show how I have perversely selectively Hibernated by explaining AEVASIVE) does conceptually crystalize the reasons for, and uncover the specific categories (easily exemplifiable and in general logically definable such) of the natural causes behind why always being (or becoming) 'visceromotorially' and emotionally reactive and cognitively "realistically pessimistic" (a pessimism/hopelessness based on the totality of available sensory clues - past as well as present) has at least up till now (in our phylogeny) BEEN MALADAPTIVE. The concept AEVASIVE refers to the evolutionary and functional principles that normally prevent a completely realistic (or philosophically over-the-top open-eyedness ;-) pessimism. AEVASIVE is AS PARTLY EVIDENCED by e.g. many decades of clinical NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL observations of the specialization of the dominant and subdominant hemispheres (their frontal cortices especially) at, in respect of the former, representing positive, optimistic, humorous, and labyrinthine lingual means of leading (shunting) and explaining away and putting "a lid" on potential largely non- AEVASIVE 'sad' psychoemotional and visceromotor reactions (or focuses of actention) of the latter. Beyond perfectly workable functions by which we habituate to repeated *insignificant* (or neither potentially sooner nor later distressing) stimuli, a consistently "non-AEVASIVE" overall motivation and omni-directional cognitive conscious awareness (including introverted insights that results from fluent functional integration of neurons at different phylogenetically evolved, and, ideally, fully ontogenetically developed, *levels of consciousness* - thereby forging what may be called a "feeling consciousness") HAS NEVER - in our phylogeny - BEEN and ADAPTIVE 'attitude' (so to speak). ---------- You could of course always argue that I should be more merciful to you (and others) and refrain for poiniting this aspect of our phylogeny out. You could rightly so, since it is as I just boldly wrote without shouting. I know that the existence of a percEPTively spotted and aptly concEPTualized view of the AEVASIVE aspect of human evolution and our genophenotype is utterly impossible according to Edserian dogma. But it is a knowledge I - and I hope you - can easily learn to live with. %-] On that invitation to an upbeat and not too discordant last note, I hereby end this retort! P
