limerickman said:It was a master class in rugby - 20th century rugby against 21st century rugby.
I have to say that while NZ were good, Ireland played well within themselves. A few of them did play to their potential, which is why I singled out Murphy for his coolness and the #8. The Irish #8 was pretty much operating alone when it came to attack, he had **** all backup yet he made ground and I yet don't think that he ever gave away the ball. Worth watching for the future, hopefully he'll have a pack that wants to take on the opposition around him next time.
limerickman said:McCaw, Woodcock, Williams, NZ No 6, McDonald, Howlett : all superb.
Howlett's tries reminded me of Rory Underwood, run ins (albeit very skillfull ones). The NZ. 13 was good, but I would rate the #12 above him.
limerickman said:England beat Australia : didn't see the game but a good result for Robinson and a bad one for Eddie Jones.
Apparently the front row "splintered" the Wobblies. Doesn't surprise me, Vickery and Sheridan have more in common with angry Rhinos than human beings. I was very pleased that they were selected, I nearly felt sorry for the Aussie front row.
The weak spot for England will be the back row, although I think Moody is capable of being very disruptive, he will have his work cut out against the likes of Weepu, Aaron Williams and Nonu. His sin-binning is somewhat worrying.
limerickman said:But I take my hat off to McCaw, superb.
I have to say that the ABs fielded a really beautifully balanced team today. Their back row were nothing too fancy, just good heads up play, power, techinique and 110% graft all the way.
The Fly-Half was very solid too. Never a wobble which is fantastic to see. O'Gara seems to becoming a liability as far as his temper goes, it's not the first time he's dished some afters. It's a pity that O Sullivan didn't give Humphries the whole 2nd half to play with, he seems to settle the Irish and get them moving forward.