steve46au said:There's a reason cyclist use cycling specific clothing...... it works (shhhh)
Exactly. We just started are 100+ degree time of year, here, so the cycling specific clothing becomes even more important.
steve46au said:There's a reason cyclist use cycling specific clothing...... it works (shhhh)
Slugster438 said:Yea but with that logic, you should be wearing a full motocross suit every time you ride a bicycle--and that means a chest protector, full face helmet, leather boots, knee pads, elbow pads, padded gloves and full leathers all underneath.
Do you wear all that stuff?
And if not, then how do you evaluate which items are necessary, and which aren't?
----
The most typical results of recumbent crashes is scrapes from the rider landing on their hips and legs and sliding feet-first. The main "complaint" is lacerations to the hands, especially if gloves aren't worn. Head injuries certainly happen, but they're generally not the spectacular skull fractures and broken clavicles people suffer from crashing upright bikes.
If I gotta hit something unexpectedly, I'd much rather do it feet-first, and a helmet isn't going to help things much. You can go head-first if you wanna. ;>)
~
I don't defend people's right to ride without a helmet any more than I defend their right to ride a motorcycle without one, or a car without a seatbelt. As a taxpayer, the medical bills from major head trauma will be borne partially by me (not sure for you Americans, but in Aus hospital admission is paid for by the taxpayer). Hard to see why you wouldn't wear a helmet when it doesn't affect your enjoyment of the ride at all, and helps reduce incidence of head injury.kdelong said:And you really should wear a helmet, but I will defend your right not to wear one if you don't want to.
Stu07: I can understand your concerns to a point since you would have to contribute to any hospital bills that are run up in Oz. We do not have nationalized healthcare here in the U.S., although I see it coming in the future. At this point in time, either the individual pays all of his medical bills or his health insurance picks up most of it. Either way, I tend to side with individual rights. I do not believe that the government has the right to legislate that someone should have to wear a helmet or a seatbelt. I do wear these just because it is the intelligent thing to do, but I do not beleive that it is my government's place to tell me that I have to. The best thing about it is that it improves the gene pool through natural selection.Stu07 said:I don't defend people's right to ride without a helmet any more than I defend their right to ride a motorcycle without one, or a car without a seatbelt. As a taxpayer, the medical bills from major head trauma will be borne partially by me (not sure for you Americans, but in Aus hospital admission is paid for by the taxpayer). Hard to see why you wouldn't wear a helmet when it doesn't affect your enjoyment of the ride at all, and helps reduce incidence of head injury.
I thought the most common recumbent injury was beard rash, where the recumbent rider's long and obligitory beard gets caught in the gears and ripped off the face.Slugster438 said:The most typical results of recumbent crashes is scrapes from the rider landing on their hips and legs and sliding feet-first. The main "complaint" is lacerations to the hands, especially if gloves aren't worn. Head injuries certainly happen, but they're generally not the spectacular skull fractures and broken clavicles people suffer from crashing upright bikes.
So what? The teams make money off of kit sales so it helps the teams when you buy their stuff. Helps their sponsors also. Plus some of the pro team jerseys looks a lot better than strange geometric designs and certainly better than that ghastly Primal Wear stuff.kdelong said:Thanks for all of the input. I learned a lot, namely that most of the people who responded to this thread who wear Team Wear do so mainly for comfort and convenience, and I can agree with that. I have never had a chafing problem (knock on wood) so that was not something that I was taking into consideration. I still think that there are some people out there who "if they can't be Lance Armstrong, at least they can dress like him".
Bro Deal said:So what? The teams make money off of kit sales so it helps the teams when you buy their stuff. Helps their sponsors also. Plus some of the pro team jerseys looks a lot better than strange geometric designs and certainly better than that ghastly Primal Wear stuff.
Certainly bibs are more comfortable than anything else you can wear. You should give them a try sometime.
Blademun said:I've been running cycling shoes and clipless pedals for 8 months now. As for cycling cloths, I recently got my first cycling short; a pair of mountain biker shorts.(I prefer looking casual, even on the road.)
Blademun said:After doing a few 6 hour rides in them, I dunno..I'm not really feeling the benefit. Well, granted, I have a saddle thats absolutely perfect (for me). I never much had a problem with soreness, though on rare occasions I did go numb. The shorts actually cause me discomfort, I feel like there is too much chamois and it feels like its digging into me by the fifth hour. Also walking feels atrocious, mostly because my sac is rolling from one side of the crotch of the chamois to the other as I walk(Excuse the graphic image, but there really is no better way to explain whats goin on.).
Blademun said:It may just be the fact they are mountain shorts and arn't meant for road riding. I can't wear road shorts though. Not only would I feel presumptious, I'd also never hear the end of it from my cycling friends. They are all mountain/bmx and well, to put it in their words, "Cycling tights are kinda gay". This coming from a 30 year old male, not a kid...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.