General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Alternative Medicine Worthless Against MCS

Started by Mark Thorson · · Last activity · 1 post · 358 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 April 2004
Last activity
19 April 2004
Original author
Mark Thorson
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
358
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1498-504.
    Perceived treatment efficacy for conventional and
    alternative therapies reported by persons with multiple
    chemical sensitivity. Gibson PR, Elms AN, Ruding LA. School
    of Psychology, James Madison University, MSC 7401,
    Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA.

    Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a condition in which
    persons experience negative health effects in multiple organ
    systems from exposure to low levels of common chemicals.
    Although symptoms experienced from particular chemicals vary
    across persons, they are generally stable within persons.
    The sensitivities often spread over time, first to related
    chemicals and then to other classes of chemicals. This study
    examined self-reported perceived treatment efficacy of 101
    treatments used by 917 persons with self-reported
    MCS. Treatments examined included environmental medicine
    techniques, holistic therapies, individual nutritional
    supplements, detoxification techniques, body therapies,
    Eastern-origin techniques, newer therapies,
    prescription items, and others. The three most highly
    rated treatments were creating a chemical-free living
    space, chemical avoidance, and prayer. Both creating a
    chemical-free living space and chemical avoidance were
    rated by 95% of respondents as helpful. Results for
    most therapies were mixed. Participants had consulted a
    mean of 12 health care providers and spent over one-
    third of their annual income on health care costs. We
    discuss this drain on personal resources and describe
    respondents' attitudes toward the possibility of
    healing from MCS.

    The full article can be accessed here in PDF:

    ehp.niehs.nih.gov5936.pdf

    Or here in HTML (not as good):

    ehp.niehs.nih.gov5936.html

    NOTE: in Table 2, the therapies in this study are listed,
    along with outcomes in people who tried them. Hulda
    Clark's parasite program was rated as VERY HARMFUL by
    18.7% of respondents. Contact reflex analysis was
    rated VERY HARMFUL by 18.6% of respondents. These are
    among the highest negative ratings for any
    alternative medicine therapies.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.