Alternative to mtbr?



Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bomba

Guest
Bikemagic.com is a British site that has a review section in much a similar style to mtbr. There are
a couple of differences though. Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
a.m-b. Secondly, they give out prizes each week for those who have given good reviews. In BM's
word's, "you'll not win with any old this is 'wickid/[email protected]' nonsense." There is some of that about,
but it's mainly reserved for the adult-bmx bits.

There aren't a huge amount of reviews at the mo', but it's looking quite good. Hopefully, they can
maintain the decent reviews and it will be a useful resource.

http://www.bikemagic.com/review/review.asp?1&sp=&v=1

--
a.m-b FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/ambfaq.htm

b.bmx FAQ: http://www.t-online.de/~jharris/bmx_faq.htm
 
C

Clydesdalemtb

Guest
bomba wrote:
> Bikemagic.com is a British site that has a review section in much a similar style to mtbr. There
> are a couple of differences though. Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that
> of a.m-b. Secondly, they give out prizes each week for those who have given good reviews.

we have a local board called bustedspoke.com which is quite similar.
 
S

Stephen Baker

Guest
Pete F says:

>What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?

They don't let Rimmer in there? ;-)
 
B

Bomba

Guest
P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:

> | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of a.m-b.
>
> What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?

Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally aren't testosterone-fueled,
illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call everybody 'dude'.
 
P

Pete Fagerlin

Guest
"bomba" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
| P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
|
| > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
a.m-b.
| >
| > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
|
| Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally aren't testosterone-fueled,
| illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call everybody 'dude'.

Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.
 
B

Bill Wheeler

Guest
On Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:33:45 +0100, bomba <[email protected]> wrote:

>In BM's word's, "you'll not win with any old this is 'wickid/[email protected]' nonsense." There is some of that
>about, but it's mainly reserved for the adult-bmx bits.

Wise guy aren't cha....adult-bmx....why I ought a!...

peeeeesssssssssssssss, Bill The mind serves properly as a window glass rather than as a reflector,
that is, the mind should give an immediate view instead of an interpretation of the world.
:-]
 
S

Spider

Guest
"Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> "bomba" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
> |
> | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
> a.m-b.
> | >
> | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
> |
> | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally aren't testosterone-fueled,
> | illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call everybody 'dude'.
>
> Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.

You forgot the all-important qualifier "to me" at the end of your sentence.

To those of us with functional brain cells it made plenty of sense.

Spider "if the shoe fits..."
 
P

Pete Fagerlin

Guest
"Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| "Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
| > "bomba" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| > news:[email protected]...
| > | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
| > |
| > | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
| > a.m-b.
| > | >
| > | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
| > |
| > | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally
aren't
| > | testosterone-fueled, illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call
everybody
| > | 'dude'.
| >
| > Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.
|
| You forgot the all-important qualifier "to me" at the end of your
sentence.
|
| To those of us with functional brain cells it made plenty of sense.
|
| Spider "if the shoe fits..."

Hmmm...I wonder how many folks you, or bomba, have met from MTBR?

It still doesn't make sense.

--
Pete Fagerlin

Save Fruita trails! http://www.petefagerlin.com/bookcliffs.htm
 
S

Spider

Guest
"Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> "Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> | "Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> | > "bomba" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> | > news:[email protected]...
> | > | P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > | Firstly, the website seems to have a target more akin to that of
> a.m-b.
> | > | >
> | > | > What is "a target more akin to that of amb"?
> | > |
> | > | Ok, badly phrased, but I meant the contributors to both generally
> aren't
> | > | testosterone-fueled, illiterate jump/shuttle monkeys who call
> everybody
> | > | 'dude'.
> | >
> | > Sorry. That still doesn't make sense.
> |
> | You forgot the all-important qualifier "to me" at the end of your
> sentence.
> |
> | To those of us with functional brain cells it made plenty of sense.
> |
> | Spider "if the shoe fits..."
>
> Hmmm...I wonder how many folks you, or bomba, have met from MTBR?

Oooo, an impressive non sequitur. Very nicely done.

> It still doesn't make sense.

To you, Pete, to you.

Spider
 
P

Pete Fagerlin

Guest
"Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message

<snip>

| > It still doesn't make sense.
|
| To you, Pete, to you.

The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed to know what MTBR posters
are like, doesn't read it.

Classic AMB.
 
B

Bomba

Guest
Pete Fagerlin wrote:

> | > It still doesn't make sense.
> |
> | To you, Pete, to you.
>
> The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed to know what MTBR posters
> are like, doesn't read it.

I've read it on occasions - there's good stuff, but there's a lot of **** stuff. I don't read it
regularly, so if I've made an erroneous generalisation and there are no longer large numbers of
teenagers with spelling and shift key problems, I'll retract my comments.

> Classic AMB.

Ah, without large generalisations and your pedantry, things just wouldn't be the same :~)
 
S

Spider

Guest
"Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> "Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> <snip>
>
> | > It still doesn't make sense.
> |
> | To you, Pete, to you.
>
> The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed to know what MTBR posters
> are like, doesn't read it.

No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.) But it's a nice diversionary
attempt on your part.

> Classic AMB.

Classic Fagerlin.

Spider
 
P

Pete Fagerlin

Guest
"Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| "Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
| > "Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| >
| > <snip>
| >
| > | > It still doesn't make sense.
| > |
| > | To you, Pete, to you.
| >
| > The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed
to
| > know what MTBR posters are like, doesn't read it.
|
| No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
| actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.)

Yeah, it "makes sense," to folks who admit they don't even read MTBR. Yeah, perfect sense.

But it's a nice diversionary attempt on
| your part.

Nope. No diversion. Just facts. Just commenting from experience, unlike others.

| > Classic AMB.
|
| Classic Fagerlin.

Yup. The truth, as opposed to silly generalizations based upon...no experience.

--
Pete Fagerlin

Save Fruita trails! http://www.petefagerlin.com/bookcliffs.htm
 
S

Spider

Guest
"Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> "Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> | "Pete Fagerlin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> | > "Spider" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> | >
> | > <snip>
> | >
> | > | > It still doesn't make sense.
> | > |
> | > | To you, Pete, to you.
> | >
> | > The funniest thing about this discussion is that the person who claimed
> to
> | > know what MTBR posters are like, doesn't read it.
> |
> | No, the funniest thing about this thread is you saying "it still doesn't make sense" when it
> | actually DOES make sense, and has from the beginning (except to you.)
>
> Yeah, it "makes sense," to folks who admit they don't even read MTBR. Yeah, perfect sense.

Clue: Define the difference between "I don't read it regularly," "I don't read it" and "I have read
it in the past, but don't bother any more."

Ding! We have a pedantic winner!

> But it's a nice diversionary attempt on
> | your part.
>
> Nope.

Uhh, yup.

> No diversion.

LOL!

> Just facts.

Yeah, "facts." Spin some more, please...

> Just commenting from experience, unlike others.

Ahhh, yes. The "superiority play." More classic Fagerlin.

> | > Classic AMB.
> |
> | Classic Fagerlin.
>
> Yup. The truth, as opposed to silly generalizations based upon...no experience.

Ooops, now who made an unsubstantiated generalization? LOL! "The truth" - you are too funny.

Spider
 
Status
Not open for further replies.