D
Dan Connelly
Guest
Frank Drackman wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> the 2nd rider is only identified as still being involved in cycling. as
>> far as i know livingston isn't.
>>
>
> He leads some tours, does that qualify for being involved?
>
>
The key is which rider(s) have something to lose by being ID'ed, but not TOO much to lose.
That rules out current racers, obviously. Vaughters is a director, which qualifies. I'm not sure
Livingston has much to lose by running a few tours, but maybe.
http://bicyclehabitat.com/page.cfm?PageID=477
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> the 2nd rider is only identified as still being involved in cycling. as
>> far as i know livingston isn't.
>>
>
> He leads some tours, does that qualify for being involved?
>
>
The key is which rider(s) have something to lose by being ID'ed, but not TOO much to lose.
That rules out current racers, obviously. Vaughters is a director, which qualifies. I'm not sure
Livingston has much to lose by running a few tours, but maybe.
http://bicyclehabitat.com/page.cfm?PageID=477